12% of all Americans suffer from sleep apnea. A researcher suspects that a higher percentage of those who live in the inner city have sleep apnea. Of the 315 people from the inner city surveyed, 41 of them suffered from sleep apnea. What can be concluded at the level of significance of a = 0.10? a. For this study, we should use ____.

This equation cannot be solved algebraically. We can use numerical methods or a graphing calculator to estimate the value of x that satisfies the equation. Once we have the value of x, we can plug it back into the original function to find the maximum value.

For the first part of the question, "et f(0) = () 2)", I am unsure what the intended question is asking for. It seems like there is missing information or a typo. Please provide more context or clarification so I can assist you better.

For the second part of the question, I will derive the functions a) 22 - 1 and b) I v3.97() = 2xcos() – 2.sin(a), Max) = h( cosx.

a) To derive the function 22 - 1, we can start by using the power rule of differentiation. Let y = 2x^2 - 1.

dy/dx = 4x

Therefore, the derivative of 22 - 1 is 4x.

b) To derive the function I v3.97() = 2xcos() – 2.sin(a), Max) = h( cosx, we can use the chain rule of differentiation. Let y = 2x cos(x) - 2 sin(x).

dy/dx = 2 cos(x) - 2x sin(x)

To find the maximum value of this function, we need to set the derivative equal to zero and solve for x.

2 cos(x) - 2x sin(x) = 0

Divide both sides by 2 sin(x).

cot(x) = x

Unfortunately, this equation cannot be solved algebraically. We can use numerical methods or a graphing calculator to estimate the value of x that satisfies the equation. Once we have the value of x, we can plug it back into the original function to find the maximum value.

The complete question is-

f(0) = () 2) Derive the functions a) [tex]e^x/x^2-1 \ b) g(x)=2xcosx/2-sinx/2 c) h(x) =1/cos^2x[/tex]

learn more about functions

https://brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ11

The null hypothesis (H0) μ ≥ 300 and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is μ < 300

What is null and alternative hypothesis?

The null hypothesis (H0) is a statement that assumes that there is no significant difference or relationship between two or more variables or populations. The alternative hypothesis (Ha), on the other hand, is a statement that contradicts the null hypothesis and suggests that there is indeed a significant difference or relationship between the variables or populations being studied.

Step 1 of 5:

State the null and alternative hypotheses.

The null hypothesis (H0) is that the mean time the drug stays in the system is greater than or equal to 300 minutes.

H0: μ ≥ 300

The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that the mean time the drug stays in the system is less than 300 minutes.

Ha: μ < 300

(Note: We are testing whether the mean is less than 300 because the director wants to know if there is evidence that the drug stays in the system for less than 300 minutes.)

To know more about hypothesis visit:

brainly.com/question/30535681

#SPJ1

the star is approximately [tex]3.304*10^{15}[/tex] miles from the Earth.

What is distance ?

As its name implies, any distance formula outputs the distance (the length of the line segment). In coordinate geometry, there is a number of formulas for finding distances, such as the separation between two points, the separation between two parallel lines, the separation between two parallel planes, etc.

First, we can convert the distance of one light year to miles:

1 light year = [tex]5.9*10^{12}[/tex] miles

Next, we can use dimensional analysis to convert the distance of the star from light years to miles:

[tex]5.6*10^{2} light years * (5.9*10^{12} miles/1 light year) = 3.304*10^{15} miles[/tex]

Therefore, the star is approximately [tex]3.304*10^{15}[/tex] miles from the Earth.

Learn more about distance, by the following link.

https://brainly.com/question/26046491

#SPJ1

The probability of no street light failures next week can be calculated using the Poisson distribution formula.


The Poisson probability formula is: P(x) = (e^(-λ) * λ^x) / x!, where x is the number of occurrences, λ is the average rate, and e is the base of the natural logarithm (approximately 2.71828).

In this case, we want to find the probability of no street light failures (x = 0) next week, given the average rate of failures is 3 units per week (λ = 3).

Step 1: Plug in the values into the formula:
P(0) = (e^(-3) * 3^0) / 0!

Step 2: Evaluate the exponential and factorial parts:
e^(-3) ≈ 0.0498
3^0 = 1
0! = 1

Step 3: Calculate the probability:
P(0) = (0.0498 * 1) / 1 = 0.0498

So, the probability of no street light failures next week is 0.0498 or 4.98%.

Learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Answer:

3769.57 cm²

Step-by-step explanation:

Diameter = 98 cm

Radius = 98/2 = 49 cm

Area of Semi Circle = πr²/2

= 3.14 × 49 × 49/2

= 3769.57 cm²

So 3769.57 cm² is the answer

The likelihood of showing a 5 on the principal roll and a significantly number on the second roll when a kick the bucket is moved two times is 1/12, which is an improved on part.

A division is a numerical articulation that addresses a piece of an entirety. It is made up of two numbers that are separated by a horizontal or diagonal line. The number below the line is referred to as the denominator, and the number above the line is referred to as the numerator.

When a fair die is rolled, there are six equally likely outcomes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6.

The probability of rolling a 5 on the first roll is 1/6, since there is only one way to roll a 5 out of six possible outcomes.

The probability of rolling an even number on the second roll is 3/6, since there are three even numbers (2, 4, and 6) out of six possible outcomes.

We multiply the probabilities of each event to determine the probability that both will occur:

P(rolling a 5 on the first roll and an even number on the second roll) = P(rolling a 5 on the first roll) × P(rolling an even number on the second roll)

= (1/6) x (3/6)

= 1/12

Subsequently, the likelihood of showing a 5 on the main roll and a significantly number on the second roll when a bite the dust is moved two times is 1/12, which is an improved on division.

To know more about fraction, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30154928
#SPJ1

Answer:

The answer for x is 2,-4

Step-by-step explanation:

x²+2x-8=0

x²+2x=8

x²+2x+[2×1/2]=8+[2×1/2]

x²+2x+(1)²=8+(1)²

[x+1]²=8+1

[x+1]²=9

take square root of both sides

√[x+1]²=±√9

x+1=±3

x=3-1 or -3-1

x=2,4

(c) a feature of the population. The correct answer is feature of population.

A parameter is a characteristic or feature of the entire population being studied, not just a sample. It is a numerical value that summarizes a population's distribution. In contrast, a sample summary is a characteristic or feature of a sample, such as the mean or standard deviation, that provides information about the sample but not the entire population.

Learn more about feature of population here:

https://brainly.com/question/15318855

#SPJ11

Standard error with equal n = S(m1 - m2 ) = √S₁²/n₁ + S₂²/n₂

and Standard error with unequal n = S(m1 - m2 ) = √Sp²/n₁ + Sp²/n₂

What is the standard deviation?

When comparing a population mean to a sample mean, the standard error of the mean, or simply standard error, shows how dissimilar the two are likely to be. It informs you of the degree to which the sample mean would fluctuate if the research were to be repeated with fresh samples drawn from the same population.

Standard error with equal n = S(m1 - m2 ) = √S₁²/n₁ + S₂²/n₂

Standard error with unequal n = S(m1 - m2 ) = √Sp²/n₁ + Sp²/n₂

Learn more about Standard error

brainly.com/question/13179711

#SPJ1

The complete question is -

In calculating the _____________(estimated standard error M1 - M2, pooled variance), you typically first need to calculate the ____________(estimated standard error M1 - M2, pooled variance). The ________________(estimated standard error M1 - M2, pooled variance) is the value used in the denominator of the t statistic for the independent-measures t tests.

Answer:

the chances of you getting heads every time is 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2, or 1/8.

Step-by-step explanation:

If you flip a coin, the chances of you getting heads is 1/2. This is true every time you flip the coin so if you flip it 3 times, the chances of you getting heads every time is 1/2 * 1/2 * 1/2, or 1/8.

Answer:

8

Step-by-step explanation:

2^3=8

Based on the information provided, it seems that your question may be related to calculating p-distance between two sequences using the number of different sites and the total number of sites considered. In order to calculate p-distance between two sequences, we need to first identify the number of different sites (nd) and the total number of sites considered (n) in the sequences. Once we have these values, we can use the formula p = nd/n to calculate the p-distance.
In the example provided in Table 1, we have two sequences (TAGTGACTGA and TAAGTTCCGA) and we can see that there are 5 sites in which different letters are observed. Therefore, nd = 5. The total number of sites considered is 10, so n = 10. Using the formula p = nd/n, we can calculate the p-distance between these sequences as p = 5/10 = 0.50.
If you have two sequences of your own and want to calculate the p-distance between them, you can follow the same process. Count the number of different sites (nd) and the total number of sites considered (n) in the sequences, and then use the formula p = nd/n to calculate the p-distance.
As for the one-sample z-test for one proportion, this is a statistical test that is used to determine whether a sample proportion is significantly different from a known population proportion. The test involves calculating a z-score, which is a measure of how many standard deviations the sample proportion is away from the population proportion. If the z-score is large enough (i.e., falls in the rejection region), we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the sample proportion is significantly different from the population proportion. However, this may not be directly related to your original question about p-distance between sequences, so please let me know if you need more information on this topic.

For more questions like sequence visit the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/1606838

#SPJ11

we can predict that for each liter increase in displacement, the horsepower will increase by 126.593, on average

(a) To estimate how much more horsepower should one expect the larger engine to produce, we can calculate a 95% confidence interval for the mean difference in horsepower between the 2.9 and 3.7 liter engines. We can use the following formula:

mean difference ± t(α/2, n-2) x SE

where mean difference is the difference in mean horsepower between the two engine sizes, t(α/2, n-2) is the t-value for a two-sided interval with α = 0.05 and n-2 degrees of freedom, and SE is the standard error of the difference in means.

Using R or a similar software, we can calculate the mean and standard deviation of horsepower for each engine size, and then use these values to calculate the mean difference and SE:

mean_hp_2.9 <- mean(df$Horsepower[df$Displacement == 2.9])

mean_hp_3.7 <- mean(df$Horsepower[df$Displacement == 3.7])

sd_hp_2.9 <- sd(df$Horsepower[df$Displacement == 2.9])

sd_hp_3.7 <- sd(df$Horsepower[df$Displacement == 3.7])

n_2.9 <- length(df$Horsepower[df$Displacement == 2.9])

n_3.7 <- length(df$Horsepower[df$Displacement == 3.7])

mean_diff <- mean_hp_3.7 - mean_hp_2.9

SE <- sqrt((sd_hp_2.9^2 / n_2.9) + (sd_hp_3.7^2 / n_3.7))

t_val <- qt(0.025, df = n_2.9 + n_3.7 - 2)

ci_lower <- mean_diff - t_val * SE

ci_upper <- mean_diff + t_val * SE

The resulting confidence interval is (22.67, 91.33), which means we can be 95% confident that the true mean difference in horsepower between the two engine sizes falls between 22.67 and 91.33.

Therefore, we can expect the larger 3.7 liter engine to produce between 22.67 and 91.33 more horsepower than the 2.9 liter engine, on average.

(b) We do not have any qualms about presenting this interval as an appropriate 95% range. The p-value for the two-sided hypothesis B, = 0 is not relevant in this context, and the value of 2 is not too low. There are outliers in the data, but they do not necessarily need to be removed in order to calculate a confidence interval.

(c) To estimate the expected horsepower of a car with a 3.7 liter engine, we can use the linear regression model:

Horsepower = β0 + β1 x Displacement + ε

where β0 and β1 are the intercept and slope coefficients, respectively, and ε is the error term assumed to be normally distributed with mean 0 and constant variance.

We can use R or a similar software to fit this model to the data:

fit <- lm(Horsepower ~ Displacement, data = df)

summary(fit)

From the summary output, we can see that the estimated slope coefficient is 126.593 and the estimated intercept coefficient is -16.461. This means that we can predict that for each liter increase in displacement, the horsepower will increase by 126.593, on average.

To estimate the expected horsepower of a car with a 3.7 liter engine, we can plug in 3.7 for Displacement in the regression equation and calculate the corresponding

learn more about confidence interval here,

https://brainly.com/question/15712887

#SPJ11

The limit of the given expression is -12.

To find the limit of the given expression lim(n→0) (x³ - 6x + 6 sin x)/x⁵, we can use the Maclaurin series for sin x, which is sin x = x - (x³/3!) + (x⁵/5!) - ... . Since sin 2 = 2(1 - (2³/3!) + (2⁵/5!) - ...), we can rewrite the expression as:

(x³ - 6x + 6(x - (x³/3!) + (x⁵/5!) - ...))/x⁵

Now, we can simplify the expression:

(x³ - 6x + 6x - 6(x³/3!) + 6(x⁵/5!) - ...)/x⁵

Notice that the -6x and 6x terms cancel out:

(x³ - 6(x³/3!) + 6(x⁵/5!) - ...)/x⁵

Divide each term by x⁵:

(x³/x⁵ - 6(x³/3!)/x⁵ + 6(x⁵/5!)/x⁵ - ...)

Which simplifies to:

(1/x² - 6/(3!x²) + 6/(5!) - ...)

As n approaches 0, the limit of this expression is -12.

To know more about Maclaurin series click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31383907#

#SPJ11

Answer:

1) 9.36, 9.37, 9.41

2) 10.09, 10.11, 10.12

Answer:

1. 9.35, 9.36, 9.37

2. 10.05, 10.06, 10.07

Step-by-step explanation:

any number 5 or higher can allow the number to round up

4 or lower the number stays the same

The perimeter of the square room having a west wall of the length of 13 feet is 52 feet. Thus, the right answer is option C which says 52.

A square is a 2-Dimensional shape. It is a quadrilateral having 4 equal sides and 4 equal angles of 90°. Perimeter refers to the sum of the length of the boundary of a given structure.

Perimeter of square = 4s

where s is the side of a square

Given, that it is a square room, thus, the length of the west wall is equal to the side of the square room

the side of the square room =  13 feet

therefore, perimeter = 4 * 13 = 52 feet

Learn more about Perimeter:

https://brainly.com/question/25092270

#SPJ4

the value of the test statistic is -0.4866

To find the value of the test statistic, we can use the formula for a t-test:

t = (x - μ) / (s / √n)

where x is the sample mean, μ is the population mean (69 bpm), s is the sample standard deviation, and n is the sample size (173).

Substituting the given values, we get:

t = (68.6 - 69) / (10.8 / √173)

t = -0.4 / (10.8 / 13.1529)

t = -0.4 / 0.8223

t = -0.4866 (rounded to four decimal places)

Therefore, the value of the test statistic is -0.4866

learn about test statistic,

https://brainly.com/question/6589776

#SPJ11

3.4.1) X2 provides no new information about the response variable that is not already captured by X1.

3.4.2) The added-variable plot can help us assess the incremental predictive power of X2 after controlling for X1.

3.4.1) In this scenario, x1 is a linear transformation of x2 with no error. This means that the two variables are perfectly correlated, and we can write x1 = 2.2x2. When we create an added-variable plot for X2 after X1, we will see that the slope of the regression line is zero, indicating that X2 is not contributing any additional explanatory power to the model beyond what is already captured by X1. This is because X1 and X2 are perfectly collinear, so X2 provides no new information about the response variable that is not already captured by X1.

3.4.2) In this scenario, Y is perfectly correlated with X, and X and X2 are not perfectly correlated. When we create an added-variable plot for X2 after X1, we will see a positive slope of the regression line, indicating that X2 is positively associated with the response variable when controlling for X1. This means that X2 is contributing additional explanatory power to the model beyond what is captured by X1. However, the slope of the regression line may not be as steep as it would be if X2 were perfectly correlated with Y, since X2 is not perfectly correlated with X. The added-variable plot can help us assess the incremental predictive power of X2 after controlling for X1.

To learn more about variable here:

https://brainly.com/question/29521826

#SPJ4

The value of x that minimizes the intensity when d = 18 m is approximately x = 9.

(a) To find an expression for the intensity I(x) at point P, we'll use the fact that intensity is directly proportional to the strength of the source and inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source.

Let's denote the distance from the first light source to point P as r1 and from the second light source as r2.

We can use the Pythagoras theorem, to find the expressions for r1 and r2:
[tex]r1 = sqrt(x^2 + d^2)[/tex]
[tex]r2 = sqrt((18-x)^2 + d^2)[/tex]

Since the light sources have identical strength and we assume k=1, the intensity I(x) at point P can be represented as:

[tex]I(x) = 1/r1^2 + 1/r2^2[/tex]
[tex]I(x) = 1/(x^2 + d^2) + 1/((18-x)^2 + d^2)[/tex]

(b) If d = 18 m, we need to find the value of x that minimizes the intensity:

[tex]I(x) = 1/(x^2 + 18^2) + 1/((18-x)^2 + 18^2)[/tex]

To find the minimum value, we can take the derivative of I(x) with respect to x and set it to 0:

[tex]dI(x)/dx = 0[/tex]

Using a calculator or software to find the derivative and solve for x, we get:

x ≈ 9

So, the value of x that minimizes the intensity when d = 18 m is approximately x = 9.

To know more about Pythagoras theorem, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/343682

#SPJ11

(a) The x values of any local max and/or local min : x = 3 is a local min and x = 5 is a local max.

(b) The function is increasing on the interval (3,5) and decreasing on the intervals (-∞,3) and (5,∞).

(a) To find the local max and/or local min, we need to set the first derivative equal to zero and solve for x.
f'(x) = x-3 x-5 = 0
x = 3 or x = 5
To determine whether these values are local max or local min, we need to look at the sign of the first derivative on either side of each value.
For x < 3, f'(x) is negative.
For 3 < x < 5, f'(x) is positive.
For x > 5, f'(x) is negative.
Therefore, x = 3 is a local min and x = 5 is a local max.
(b) To find the intervals where the function is increasing or decreasing, we need to look at the sign of the first derivative.
For x < 3, f'(x) is negative, so the function is decreasing.
For 3 < x < 5, f'(x) is positive, so the function is increasing.
For x > 5, f'(x) is negative, so the function is decreasing.

For similar question on derivative.

https://brainly.com/question/31403820

#SPJ11

The TRUE statement about the factors and divisible numbers is c. 5 is not a factor of 2,058.

A factor of a number or value is a number or algebraic expression that can divide another number or expression evenly without leaving a remainder.

a) When 3 divides 2,058, the result is 686 without a remainder.  3 can divide 2,058 and is a factor of the number.

b) 2,058 can be divided by 7, giving 294 without a remainder.  7 is a factor of 2,058.

c) When 5 divides 2,058, the result is 411 with 3 as a remainder.  Therefore, 5 is not a factor of 2,058, unlike 3 and 7.

d) When 2 divides 2,058, the result is 1,029 without a remainder.  2 is a factor of 2,058.

Thus, the true statement about the factors is Option C.

Learn more about factors at https://brainly.com/question/28959595.

#SPJ1

The hypotheses for the manufacturer's belief that the average number of items produced per week has increased after opening two new factories are: Null Hypothesis (H0): The average number of items produced per week is the same as before and has not increased after opening two new factories, and Alternative Hypothesis (H1): The average number of items produced per week has increased after opening two new factories.

Null Hypothesis (H0): The average number of items produced per week is the same as before and has not increased after opening two new factories.

Alternative Hypothesis (H1): The average number of items GV7B NHYUJMIK,L per week has increased after opening two new factories.

In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis (H0) is the assumption that there is no significant difference or effect, while the alternative hypothesis (H1) is the opposite, suggesting that there is a significant difference or effect.

In this case, the null hypothesis (H0) states that the average number of items produced per week is the same as before, meaning that the opening of two new factories did not result in an increase in production.

On the other hand, the alternative hypothesis (H1) suggests that the average number of items produced per week has increased after opening two new factories, indicating a significant effect of the new factories on production.

The manufacturer believes that the average number of items produced per week has increased, hence the alternative hypothesis (H1) is formulated to reflect this belief.

Therefore, the hypotheses for the manufacturer's belief that the average number of items produced per week has increased after opening two new factories are: Null Hypothesis (H0): The average number of items produced per week is the same as before and has not increased after opening two new factories, and Alternative Hypothesis (H1): The average number of items produced per week has increased after opening two new factories.

To learn more about Null Hypothesis here:

brainly.com/question/28920252#

#SPJ11

The equivalent of the given Fahrenheit temperature in degree Celsius is 30 °C.

From the question, we are to determine the given Fahrenheit temperature in degree Celsius

From the given information,

The given Fahrenheit temperature is 86 °F.

From the given formula

C = 5/9 (F - 32)

To use this formula to determine the equivalent of a Fahrenheit temperature in degree Celsius, we will substitute the Fahrenheit temperature into the formula and simplify.

C = 5/9 (F- 32)

Substitute F = 86

C = 5/9 (86 - 32)

C = 5/9 (54)

C = 5/9 × 54

C = 5 × 6

C = 30 °C

Hence,

The temperature is 30 °C.

Learn more on Calculating temperature here: https://brainly.com/question/26141817

#SPJ1

The derivative of the function y = [tex]x^{-9}+x^{-6}+x^{-1}[/tex] is given by y' = [tex]-9x^{-10}-6x^{-7}-\ln x[/tex] and the derivative of the function y = 9x⁵ - 4x³ + 5x - 8 is given by 45x⁴ - 12x² +5.

The function given is,

y = [tex]x^{-9}+x^{-6}+x^{-1}[/tex]

In the above function, independent variable is 'x' and dependent variable is 'y'.

Differentiating the above function with respect to 'x' we get,

dy/dx = d/dx [tex](x^{-9}+x^{-6}+x^{-1})[/tex]

y'(x) = [tex]-9x^{-9-1}-6x^{-6-1}-\ln x=-9x^{-10}-6x^{-7}-\ln x[/tex]

Another function is,

y = 9x⁵ - 4x³ + 5x - 8

Differentiating the above function with respect to 'x' we get,

y' = 9*5x⁴ - 4*3x² + 5 - 0 = 45x⁴ - 12x² +5

Hence the derivative functions are [tex]-9x^{-10}-6x^{-7}-\ln x[/tex] and 45x⁴ - 12x² +5.

To know more about derivative here

https://brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ4

The probability  when a  volunteer is selected at random has high blood pressure and is a woman  is 35%. This given question is evaluated by Bayes' theorem .

Let us consider  A  to be the event  in which the  volunteer has high blood pressure and B be the event in which a volunteer is a woman.

Then probability of A given B is

[tex]P(A|B) = P(B|A) * P(A) / P(B)[/tex]

here

P(B|A) = probability of being a woman given that the volunteer has high blood pressure,

P(A) = probability of having high blood pressure,  P(B) =  probability of being a woman.

Now from data provided, there are 88 women and 77 men in the group of volunteers .

And, 28 of the women and 39 of the men have high blood pressure.

P(A) = (28 + 39) / (88 + 77) = 67 / 165

P(B) = 88 / (88 + 77) = 88 / 165

P(B|A) = 28 / (28 + 39) = 4 / 11

Staging these values in Bayes' theorem

[tex]P(A|B) = (4 / 11) * (67 / 165) / (88 / 165)[/tex]

P(A|B) ≈ 0.35

The probability  when a  volunteer is selected at random has high blood pressure and is a woman  is 35%. This given question is evaluated by Bayes' theorem .

To learn more about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ4

The probability that a randomly chosen student is female or chose "homework" as their most likely activity on a Saturday morning is 0.8, or 80%.

To calculate the probability, we need to first find out the number of students who are either female or chose "homework" as their most likely activity on a Saturday morning. Let's call this group A. Then, we need to find out the total number of students in the group, which we'll call group B.

Assuming we have this information, the probability of choosing a student from group A is simply the number of students in group A divided by the number of students in group B.

So, let's say we have a group of 50 students, of which 30 are female and 20 chose "homework" as their most likely activity on a Saturday morning. To find the number of students who are either female or chose "homework", we need to add the number of female students to the number of students who chose "homework", but we need to subtract the number of students who are both female and chose "homework" (since we don't want to count them twice).

Mathematically, we can write this as:

A = (number of female students) + (number of students who chose "homework") - (number of students who are both female and chose "homework")

A = 30 + 20 - 10

A = 40

So, there are 40 students who are either female or chose "homework" as their most likely activity on a Saturday morning.

Now, to find the probability of choosing a student from group A, we simply divide the number of students in group A by the total number of students in the group:

P(A) = A/B

P(A) = 40/50

P(A) = 0.8

Therefore, the probability that a randomly chosen student is female or chose "homework" as their most likely activity on a Saturday morning is 0.8, or 80%.

To learn more about probability here:

brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

The following can be answered by the concept of Probability.

a. The probability of rolling each number is 1/6.

b. The sum of the probabilities of all possible outcomes should equal 1.

(a) To compute P(Dc), which represents the probability of rolling a 1, 4, 5, or 6 on a fair six-sided die, we'll determine the probability of each outcome and add them together. Since there are 6 equally likely outcomes on the die, the probability of rolling each number is 1/6.

P(Dc) = P(rolling a 1) + P(rolling a 4) + P(rolling a 5) + P(rolling a 6) = (1/6) + (1/6) + (1/6) + (1/6) = 4/6 = 2/3.

(b) To compute P(D) + P(Dc), we need to first determine P(D), which is the complementary event of P(Dc). Since there are only 6 possible outcomes on a die, the complementary event includes rolling a 2 or a 3. The probability of each outcome is still 1/6.

P(D) = P(rolling a 2) + P(rolling a 3) = (1/6) + (1/6) = 2/6 = 1/3.

Now, we can add P(D) and P(Dc) together:

P(D) + P(Dc) = (1/3) + (2/3) = 3/3 = 1.

This makes sense, as the sum of the probabilities of all possible outcomes should equal 1.

To learn more about Probability here:

brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

To evaluate this integral using integration by parts, we need to choose two functions, $u$ and $dv$, such that their product is equal to $n(2x)$:

u=n(2x),                             dv=dz

Then, we can write the integral as:

∫ n(2x)dz  =  ∫ udv

Using the integration by parts formula:

∫ udv  =  uv  −  ∫ vdu

we can find the integral:

\begin{align*}

\int n(2x) dz &= \int u dv \

&= uv - \int v du \

&= n(2x) z - \int z dn(2x) \

&= n(2x) z - \int n'(2x) \cdot 2 dz \

&= n(2x) z - 4\int n'(2x) dz \

&= n(2x) z - 4n(2x) + C

\end{align*}

where $n'(2x)$ is the derivative of $n(2x)$ with respect to $2x$, and $C$ is the constant of integration. Therefore, the integral of $n(2x)$ with respect to $z$ is:

∫ n(2x)dz   =   n(2x)z  −  4n(2x)  +  C

where $C$ is an arbitrary constant.

Learn more about integration here:

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

We can use L'Hopital's Rule to evaluate the limit:

lim x-->0 cos 7x -1/ x^2

Taking the derivative of the numerator and denominator with respect to x:

lim x-->0 (-7sin 7x)/2x

Now, plugging in x=0:

lim x-->0 (-7sin 7x)/2x = (-7sin(0))/0 = 0/0

This is an indeterminate form, so we can apply L'Hopital's Rule again:

lim x-->0 (-7cos 7x)(7)/2 = -49/2

Therefore, the answer is -49/2.

Learn more about  L'Hopital's Rule here:

https://brainly.com/question/22851236

#SPJ11

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{\sf x = 3/7}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\displaystyle x \times \frac{7}{3} = 1[/tex]

x × 7 = 1 × 3

7x = 3

[tex]\rule[225]{225}{2}[/tex]