what is the role 'chair public enquiries and commisions'
The role of the Chair of Public Enquiries and Commissions is to lead the investigation into an issue of public concern.
This could include anything from an inquiry into a tragedy or a review of public policy. The Chair will typically be an independent, impartial person with expertise in the relevant field. They will be responsible for setting the terms of the inquiry, developing the remit, appointing staff and selecting witnesses.
They will also manage the progress of the inquiry, including overseeing hearings, interviews and evidence gathering. The Chair is ultimately responsible for producing a report with conclusions and recommendations. This report will be used to inform decisions and actions to address the issue of public concern. The role of the Chair is therefore vital in ensuring that the inquiry is thorough, fair and transparent.
Know more about public policy here
https://brainly.com/question/30137681#
#SPJ11
A landlord, Greg, enters a lease with a tenant, Charlie, for 2 months, beginning on January 1st, 2019 and ending on February 28th, 2019. On February 27th, Charlie dies, leaving the apartment to his son Manny. What rents can Greg receive?
Based on the given case, A landlord, Greg, enters a lease with a tenant, Greg receives a full term of 2 months paid for rent.
A lease is an arrangement to utilize a piece of property for the duration of the terms that are specified. Due to the fact that this is an annual tenancy, neither Charlie nor the lease is terminated by death.
The term "tenant" refers to a person who purchases land or other property from a landowner on a lease or through rent. In the given case, Charlie is a tenant.
After Charlie passes away, Manny receives the lease; all he has to do is make sure the entire two-month term was paid.
Read more about the lease agreement, here:
brainly.com/question/24460932
#SPJ4
Late one night a deputy sheriff catches Bill and Rudy stealing Javier's cattle. When apprehended, the two had successfully loaded six calves into a trailer. The fair market value of the calves is $200 each. The most serious offense Bill and Rudy may be charged with is:
Bill and Rudy could be charged with the crime of grand larceny or grand theft, which is the unlawful taking of property that is valued above a certain amount, typically set by state law.
The value of the six calves at $200 each gives a total value of $1,200, which exceeds the threshold for grand larceny in most states.
The specific charge and degree of the offense will depend on the laws of the state where the crime occurred and the circumstances of the theft. However, based on the information given, it appears that Bill and Rudy could be charged with a felony offense of grand larceny or grand theft.
It should be noted that additional charges, such as burglary or criminal trespass, may also be applicable depending on the circumstances of how Bill and Rudy gained access to Javier's property and committed the theft.
To know more about grand larceny here:
https://brainly.com/question/3711210
#SPJ4
What are the alias for the dataframe method '.sort()'?
The .sort() method in a Pandas DataFrame is used to sort the values in a particular axis based on the specified conditions.
There are several aliases for the .sort() method that are commonly used to sort DataFrames. Some of the most commonly used aliases include:
.sort_index(): sorts the DataFrame based on the row or column labels.
.sort_values(): sorts the DataFrame based on the values in one or more columns.
.sort_index(axis=1): sorts the DataFrame based on the column labels.
.sort_values(by='column_name'): sorts the DataFrame based on the values in a specific column.
These aliases provide flexibility in how DataFrames can be sorted and allow users to sort based on specific requirements.
Learn more about .sort() here
https://brainly.com/question/23955076
#SPJ4
Defenses to intentional torts are:a. useless to defendants in negligence tortsb. not available to defendants in negligence torts c. also available to defendants in negligence tortsd. rarely available to defendants in negligence torts e. none of the other choices
Defenses to intentional torts are also available to defendants in negligence torts. The correct answer is (c). Defenses to intentional torts can also be used as defenses in negligence torts.
These defenses include consent, self-defense, defense of others, defense of property, and necessity. Consent is when the plaintiff gave permission for the defendant's actions. Self-defense is when the defendant acted to protect themselves from harm.
Defense of others is when the defendant acted to protect someone else from harm. Defense of property is when the defendant acted to protect their property. Necessity is when the defendant acted in a way that was necessary to prevent harm from occurring.
These defenses can be used in both intentional torts and negligence torts, as they apply to situations where the defendant had a valid reason for their actions.
To know more about intentional torts refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29871339#
#SPJ11
In Daubert, a court deciding whether to admit expert scientific testimony must first determine whether the expert is proposing to testify to
The expert is proposing to testify to scientific knowledge that is based on valid reasoning or methodology, and whether that testimony can be applied to the facts of the case.
In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court held that a court deciding whether to admit expert scientific testimony must first determine whether the expert is proposing to testify to scientific knowledge that is based on valid reasoning or methodology and whether that testimony can be applied to the facts of the case.
This standard is known as the Daubert standard. It requires that the expert's testimony be based on scientific methodology that has been tested and subject to peer review and that the testimony is relevant and reliable in relation to the facts of the case. The purpose of the Daubert standard is to ensure that scientific evidence presented in court is based on sound science and is relevant and reliable to the case at hand.
Learn more about Daubert v. Merrell here: https://brainly.com/question/29629263
#SPJ4
The tort of emotional distress protects from conduct that goes beyond the bounds of decency, but not from:a. petty insults b. bad languagec. annoying behaviord. all the other specific choices
The tort of emotional distress is a legal concept that protects individuals from severe emotional harm caused by the conduct of others.
This tort provides legal recourse for individuals who have suffered emotional distress due to conduct that goes beyond the bounds of decency. However, it does not protect individuals from petty insults, bad language, or annoying behavior.
The tort of emotional distress requires that the conduct in question is extreme and outrageous, which means that it must be beyond the realm of what is acceptable in society. This means that mere annoyances or trivial matters will not be sufficient to establish a claim for emotional distress.
To establish a claim for emotional distress, the conduct must be so severe and outrageous that it causes a reasonable person to suffer severe emotional distress.
To know more about emotional distress visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14925194
#SPJ11
O gives property to A, B, C as joint tenancy. C gives interest to D. Then B dies intestate with H as sole heir. D files for partition. If a physical partition is impossible, how should the property be apportioned?
If a physical partition of the property is impossible, the court may order a sale of the property and distribute the proceeds equally among the co-owners.
Property refers to any physical or virtual item that is owned or controlled by an individual or entity and can be legally classified as either real property or personal property. The property can be subject to various laws and regulations governing ownership, transfer, and use.
In legal terms, property can be further defined as a bundle of rights, including the right to possess, use, sell, rent, or transfer the property, as well as the right to exclude others from doing the same.
Learn more about property here:
https://brainly.com/question/13050595
#SPJ4
Under Texas law, a home invasion is normally prosecuted as a:
Under Texas law, a home invasion is typically prosecuted as a burglary. Burglary is a felony offence in Texas, and it involves unauthorized entry into a building with the intent to commit a theft, assault, or another felony.
The correct answer is Burglary.
Burglary is typically prosecuted as a felony, and the severity of the offence and the potential penalties will depend on various factors. If the building in question is a residence, such as a home or an apartment, the offence is known as residential burglary, considered a more severe crime than other forms of burglary.
In addition, a conviction for burglary can result in imprisonment, fines, and other legal consequences. The same penalties for a burglary conviction will depend on various factors, including the severity of the offence, the defendant's prior criminal history, and other mitigating or aggravating factors.
To learn more about felony, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30175834
#SPJ4
You look at a box of cereal in the grocery store and, to your surprise, see your photo on it. You may probably sue for the tort of:a. assaultb. malicious prosecutionc. invasion of privacyd. defamatione. none of the other choices
If your image was put on a cereal box without your permission, we might have a strong case for invasion of privacy.
A multitude of wrongdoings, such as using someone else's name or likeness for profit, are included in the tort known as invasion of privacy. A person's right to privacy may be violated by unauthorized use of their picture or likeness for commercial gain, which may give rise to a lawsuit for damages.
However, whether you have a good case for invasion of privacy in this situation would rely on a number of things, including the specifics of how your photograph was used, the context where it was used, and if you have previously
Hence, the correct option is C.
Learn more about invasion of privacy, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2732893
#SPJ4
Reckless or outrageous conduct that creates severe mental torment may be the tort of:a. battery b. libelc. slanderd. invasion of privacy e. emotional distress
Emotional distress(option e), also known as mental anguish, is a type of tort that involves intentional or reckless conduct that causes severe emotional or mental distress to the victim. This can include behavior such as stalking, harassment, or extreme bullying.
The conduct must be so extreme and outrageous that it goes beyond what is acceptable in society and causes severe mental torment to the victim. Battery, libel, slander, and invasion of privacy are all different types of torts that involve harm to a person's physical or reputational interests, rather than their mental or emotional well-being.
Battery is the intentional harmful or offensive contact with another person, while libel and slander involve false statements made about a person that harm their reputation. Invasion of privacy involves the unauthorized use or disclosure of a person's private information or affairs.
Overall, emotional distress is a serious issue that can have long-lasting effects on a person's mental health and well-being. Victims of emotional distress may be able to seek compensation through a civil lawsuit against the individual or entity responsible for their suffering.
To know more about Emotional distress visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13948475
#SPJ11
why does it make judges not effective because they are more likely to rule in favour of the government
Judges who are appointed by the government can be less effective as they may be less likely to rule in favour of the citizen or the public interest.
This is because they may be seen to be biased in favour of the government, and the government may expect them to rule in their favour. Furthermore, the judges may be more prone to loyalty to the government that appointed them, rather than to the law.
This can lead to the judges being less impartial and more likely to ignore legal precedent or the law. In addition, the influence of the government on the judiciary can lead to a lack of judicial independence, meaning that the judiciary cannot act objectively and impartially. This can result in the public feeling less confidence in the judicial system, which can lead to a lack of respect for the law.
Know more about legal precedent here
https://brainly.com/question/29618654#
#SPJ11
T/F A person may not testify as an expert unless he has prior experience working with the particular item, matter, or product involved in the litigation.
A person is ineligible to testify as an expert unless he has past expertise handling the specific thing, subject, or product at issue in the lawsuit. This statement is false.
While prior experience with the particular item, matter, or product involved in the litigation may be a relevant factor in determining whether a person can testify as an expert, it is not an absolute requirement.
The Federal Rules of Evidence, as well as many state rules, provide guidelines for the admissibility of expert testimony. Under these rules, a person may qualify as an expert witness if he or she has "knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education" that will assist the trier of fact in understanding the evidence or determining a fact at issue.
The specific requirements for expert testimony may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the case. For example, in some cases, the court may require that the expert have a certain level of education or certification in a particular field. However, prior experience with the specific item or matter at issue is not necessarily a prerequisite for qualifying as an expert witness.
To learn more about lawsuit
https://brainly.com/question/30392587
#SPJ4
U-turns are prohibited1) on On-way streets.2) where you do not have an unobstructed view of the roadway for at least 200 feet in both directions3) in front of fire stations
U-turns are prohibited on one-way streets, where there is an obstructed view of the roadway for at least 200 feet in both directions and in front of fire stations to ensure safety and efficient traffic flow. Therefore, all the options are correct.
Firstly, U-turns are not allowed on one-way streets. Performing a U-turn on a one-way street would cause you to go against the direction of traffic, increasing the risk of collisions and disrupting the flow of traffic.
Secondly, U-turns are prohibited where you do not have an unobstructed view of the roadway for at least 200 feet in both directions. This rule is in place because it is crucial to see oncoming traffic before making a U-turn. If your view is obstructed, you may not see approaching vehicles, pedestrians, or cyclists, leading to a potential accident.
Lastly, U-turns are not permitted in front of fire stations. Fire stations require unobstructed access to the road for emergency vehicles to quickly respond to calls. Performing a U-turn in front of a fire station could impede emergency vehicles from exiting the station, causing delays in response time and potentially putting lives at risk.
In summary, U-turns are prohibited on one-way streets, where there is an obstructed view of the roadway for at least 200 feet in both directions, and in front of fire stations to ensure safety and efficient traffic flow.
To know more about one-way streets refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30323547#
#SPJ11
Part complete
What is the primary reason that China changed its one-child policy to a two-child policy?
A) Shrinking workforce
B) Decreasing troops for the military
C) Increasing disease rates
D) Failing economy
The primary reason that China changed its one-child policy to a two-child policy is A) shrinking workforce.
China's aging population and declining birth rate have led to a shortage of workers in the labor force. This has resulted in economic challenges and the need to increase the number of young workers. By allowing families to have two children, the government hopes to encourage more births and boost the country's workforce.
Additionally, the one-child policy had unintended consequences, such as gender imbalances and forced abortions, which the government sought to address with the policy change. Overall, the shift to a two-child policy reflects China's need to balance economic and social factors while addressing demographic challenges.
For more such questions on workforce , click on:
https://brainly.com/question/31545325
#SPJ11
O conveys Whiteacre "to A for life, remainder to the heirs of B" B is alive at grant but dies soon after. C is B's heir. What's C get when A dies?
Conveys Whiteacre "to A for life, remainder to the heirs of B" B is alive at grant but dies soon after. C is B's heir. B has no interest whatsoever at the time of conveyance, but A has a possessory life estate.
A, the life tenant, is still living, hence C will obtain an ownership remainder in fee simple upon B's passing. O's reverting will end once the remainder of C vests. A's vested remainder will turn into a possession fee simple absolute upon A's passing.
A has a possessory life estate and B has no interest at all at the time of conveyance. Due to the lack of descendants for live individuals, C will inherit only as B's heir obvious. O keeps a reversion, therefore for C to be considered B's successor, B must live C.
Learn more about a life estate, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29649911
#SPJ4
Do not react, Do not make eye contact, Contact the local authorities if you need help
Recommended actions to take if you feel threatened or unsafe, include not reacting, avoiding eye contact, and contacting local authorities for assistance. These steps can help maintain your safety and manage the situation effectively.
First, it's essential not to react or engage with the person causing you to feel threatened. This action can help prevent escalation and maintain your safety. Instead, remain calm and composed, which can also help you think more clearly about your next steps.
Second, avoiding making eye contact is another important strategy. Direct eye contact might be perceived as a challenge or an invitation for confrontation by the aggressor. By avoiding eye contact, you can lessen the chances of provoking them further.
Third, if possible, move away from the situation and find a safer location. This action might include going to a public place or joining a group of people nearby. The presence of others can deter an aggressor from continuing their behavior.
Fourth, as soon as it is safe to do so, contact the local authorities for assistance. This step is crucial, as they have the training and resources to help manage the situation and ensure your safety. Be prepared to provide details about the incident, the location, and any identifying information about the person causing the threat.
In summary, when feeling threatened or unsafe, do not react or engage with the person, avoid making eye contact, seek a safer location, and contact local authorities for assistance. These steps can help maintain your safety and manage the situation effectively.
To know more about local authorities refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30295809#
#SPJ11
Complete Question:
What are some recommended actions to take if you feel threatened or unsafe, such as do not react, avoiding making eye contact, and contacting the local authorities if you require assistance?
77) Under the five critical factors "Thrives in a culture where people feel comfortable and empowered by having many degrees of freedom" is related to which factor?A) PersonnelB) DynamismC) SizeD) Culture
The factor “Thrives in a culture where people feel comfortable and empowered by having many degrees of freedom” is closely related to the factor of Culture. Culture can be defined as a shared set of beliefs, values, and norms that guide the behavior of individuals and organizations.
A culture with many degrees of freedom allows individuals to feel empowered and comfortable in their work environment. This, in turn, allows them to be more creative and productive, as they are not constrained by too many rules and regulations.
An organization with a culture that fosters many degrees of freedom also enables the organization to adapt to changing customer needs and demands. This flexibility can help the organization stay competitive and ahead of its competitors.
Furthermore, a culture that values creativity and innovation can help attract and retain talented employees, which can ultimately lead to higher customer satisfaction and better business outcomes.
Know more about organization here
https://brainly.com/question/13278945#
#SPJ11
For rent payments of $500 a month, L leases Greenacre "to T for the duration of the war."
(a) What estate does T have?
(b) What difference does it make?
For rent payments of $500 a month, L leases Greenacre "to T for the duration of the war. The effect that will create is that the court held the leasehold as a tenancy at will. The difference it makes is death terminates a tenancy but other leasehold estates can be terminated by either party.
Given rent payments of $500 a month, L leases Greenacre "to T for the duration of the war. The effect will be if there is no end date, the leasehold is not a term of years, and since there is no rolling lease, the leasehold is not a periodic tenancy. Therefore the court held the leasehold as a tenancy at will.
Death does terminate a tenancy at will, but not the other leasehold estates and no notice is required for a tenancy at will because it is terminable by either party.
Learn more about rents, here:
https://brainly.com/question/26268428
#SPJ4
If you were counsel for O in Examples 36 and 37, how would you carry out O 's desires exactly, using two pieces of paper rather than one? Would a lawyer be liable for malpractice if the lawyer failed to use two pieces of paper?
In the given case, if a lawyer failed to follow O's instructions to use two pieces of paper and this resulted in a mistake or error that caused harm to O or his beneficiaries, the lawyer may be liable for malpractice.
A lawyer is a professional who is licensed to practice law and provide legal advice and representation to clients in various legal matters. They are trained in the law and are authorized to represent individuals, businesses and other agencies.
Lawyers are also expected to uphold ethical standards and adhere to codes of conduct and professional responsibility in their practice and not getting involved in malpractices.
Learn more about lawyer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28940974
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. The decision of an association tribunal is binding on both the association member and the consumer.
TRUE, The decision of an association tribunal is binding on both the association member and the consumer. This means that once a decision has been made, it must be adhered to and cannot be appealed unless there are specific grounds for doing so.
The purpose of an association tribunal is to provide an independent and impartial forum for resolving disputes between members of an association and their consumers. The decisions made by these tribunals are legally binding and enforceable by law, so it is important for all parties involved to take them seriously.
Failure to comply with the decision of an association tribunal can result in penalties and legal consequences, so it is important to seek legal advice and follow the correct procedures when involved in a dispute.
To know more about legal advice visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28532941
#SPJ11
T/F A lay witness may testify that it was bitter cold outside.
A lay witness may testify that it was bitterly cold outside. True
A lay witness may testify to their own personal observations and perceptions, such as the temperature outside. A lay witness is someone who is not considered an expert in a particular field and is offering their testimony based on their personal knowledge or experience.
However, it is important to note that a lay witness's testimony must be relevant and helpful to the case at hand. In some cases, testimony about the weather or other observations may not be relevant to the legal issue being decided and could be excluded as irrelevant or prejudicial.
Overall, the admissibility of a lay witness's testimony will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the case and the rules of evidence in the jurisdiction where the case is being heard.
Learn more about lay witness
https://brainly.com/question/31604054
#SPJ4
Which law gives everybody equal rights and opportunities without discrimination?
The law that gives everybody equal rights and opportunities without discrimination is known as the Equality Act.
The Equality Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of nine protected characteristics: age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex.
This law ensures that everyone has the right to equal treatment in areas such as employment, education, housing, and healthcare.
The Equality Act also requires organizations to make reasonable adjustments for individuals with disabilities and to eliminate any barriers that may prevent them from accessing services or employment.
This law is crucial in promoting a fair and inclusive society, where everyone has the opportunity to reach their full potential regardless of their background or circumstances.
The Equality Act is a powerful tool for ensuring that everyone is treated with dignity and respect, and that discrimination is not tolerated in any form.
To know more about Equality Act refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/9859216#
#SPJ11
Negligence is:a. an act that results in harm to another to whom the person owes a duty of careb. an omission that results in harm to another to whom the person owes a duty of care c. a willful omission of material information that leads to injuryd. choices a and be. choices a, b and c
Negligence is the failure to take reasonable care to avoid causing harm or injury to another person, resulting in harm or injury to that person. Negligence can be an act or an omission. The correct answer is (e) choices a, b, and c.
Negligence can be an act that results in harm to another to whom the person owes a duty of care, such as driving recklessly and causing an accident. It can also be an omission that results in harm to another to whom the person owes a duty of care, such as failing to repair a broken staircase and causing someone to fall. Finally, negligence can be a willful omission of material information that leads to injury, such as a doctor failing to disclose a patient's allergies before prescribing medication.
Learn more about Negligence
https://brainly.com/question/12177947
# SPJ4
A tort is:a. a breach of a duty owed to another that causes harm b. a public lawc. designed to criminally punish wrongdoers d. a wrong defined by Congresse. a legal wrong defined by state legislatures
A tort is a legal wrong defined by state legislatures. It refers to a breach of a duty owed to another that causes harm and is a civil, not criminal matter.
The key element of a tort is that it involves a breach of duty owed to another, which causes harm or damages. Examples of torts include negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, and product liability. Torts differ from criminal law in that they are not punishable by imprisonment, but rather through monetary damages awarded to the injured party.
Torts can be defined by either state legislatures or through common law, which is based on the legal precedents set by previous court cases. Overall, the concept of tort law aims to hold individuals and entities accountable for their actions and provide a means for those who have suffered harm to seek compensation.
Learn more about state legislatures
https://brainly.com/question/3749822
#SPJ4
Discuss and provide examples of the four main aims of development and education in correctional centres.
To promote equal treatment for all; to guarantee a secure stay and humane treatment for prisoners, their families, and anyone else who comes into contact with them.
Correctional Centers:To educate prisoners about socially acceptable norms and inspire them to change; and to offer them opportunities for self-improvement. It consists of both supervision and instruction delivered to deter future criminal behaviour.
Occasionally the sentence includes the correctional programme. It is required of young offenders. The primary goal of the correctional caseworker is to help criminals adopt the ideals of the community by altering their attitudes and behaviour. As a result, the goal of the social worker is to assist the offender rather than punish him.
To know more about correctional visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31491865
#SPJ1
What is the population in Canada likely to experience soon?
A) exponential population growth
B) government institution of a population control policy
C) more senior citizens
D) more single males
E) resource depletion and decreased quality of life
The population in Canada is likely to experience more senior citizens in the near future.
This is because the country is experiencing an aging population due to a decrease in birth rates and increased life expectancy. The proportion of senior citizens is expected to increase significantly, which could have implications for healthcare, retirement benefits, and social welfare programs.
However, Canada has a well-established healthcare system and retirement benefits, which can help mitigate the impact of an aging population. On the other hand, resource depletion and decreased quality of life may also be a concern if proper measures are not taken to manage population growth and resource use.
For more such questions on senior citizens, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/29846298
#SPJ11
during which step of the dfeh complaint process does the dfeh explore options to resolve a complaint after a violation of the law has been found?
Conciliation. The DFEH will attempt to address your complaint during conciliation by coming to a consensual settlement agreement with the employer. (This is exactly what happens once the EEOC determines Reasonable Cause in the EEOC complaint process.)
The CRD receives more complaints about workplace discrimination and harassment than any other issue, despite the California Labor Commissioner's Office hearing most disputes involving pay and hour claims. The FEHA forbids harassing a potential employee, employee, applicant, unpaid intern or volunteer, or contractor because of a protected class. All workplaces, even those with fewer than five employees, are prohibited from engaging in harassment.
To learn more about Conciliation, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/28139060
#SPJ4
O conveys Blackacre "to the School Board, but if it ceases to use Blackacre for school purposes, O has a right to re-enter."
O conveys Blackacre "to the School Board, but if it ceases to use Blackacre for school purposes, O has a right to re-enter." The School Board has a fee simple subject to condition subsequent; O has a right of entry exempt from the Rule Against Perpetuities.
The rule against perpetuities is a legal rule in the common law that prevents people from using legal instruments to exert control over the ownership of private property for a time long beyond the lives of people living at the time the instrument was written. Specifically, the rule forbids a person from creating future interests in property that would vest beyond 21 years after the lifetimes of those living at the time of creation of the interest, often expressed as a life in being plus twenty-one years.
Thus, the School Board has a fee simple subject to condition subsequent; O has a right of entry exempt from the Rule Against Perpetuities.
Learn more about peretuities, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30478467
#SPJ4
O conveys Blackacre "to the School Board so long as it is used for a school, then to A and her heirs."
Q: Is the interest valid?
O conveys Blackacre to the School Board so long as it is used for a school then to A and her heirs. This violates the Rule Against Perpetuities.
O conveys Blackacre to the School Board so long as it is used for a school executes interest violates the Rule Against Perpetuities. It will not necessarily vest within A's Teome or within 21 years after A's death it may vest and become possessory centuries from now. When an interest vicates the Rule Against Perpetuities it is struck out and the remaining valid interests stand. Take a pencil and line out the void gift, then to A and her hers.
This leaves a fee simple determinable in the School Board Since 0 has not given away as entire test, O has a possibility of reverter.
Learn more about perpetuity, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30478467
#SPJ4
