$6500 is invested at 5.0% compounded continuously. How long will it take for the balance to reach $13000? Round your answer to two decimal places. Answer How to enter your answer (Opens in new window)

The probability of guessing between 3 and 7 correct responses on the test is approximately 87.43%.

To find the probability of guessing between 3 and 7 correct responses on a test consisting of 8 questions with 8 multiple choice options available for each question, we can use the binomial distribution formula.

The binomial distribution formula is:

P(X = k) = (n choose k) * [tex]p^k[/tex] * [tex](1 - p)^{(n - k)[/tex]

where:

X is the random variable representing the number of correct responses

k is the number of correct responses we want to find the probability for (between 3 and 7 in this case)

n is the total number of questions (8 in this case)

p is the probability of getting a correct answer by guessing (1/8 in this case)

We can calculate the probability of guessing exactly k correct responses using the formula above. Then, we can sum up the probabilities for k = 3 to k = 7 to get the total probability of guessing between 3 and 7 correct responses.

P(3 <= X <= 7) = P(X = 3) + P(X = 4) + P(X = 5) + P(X = 6) + P(X = 7)

Using the binomial distribution formula, we get:

P(X = k) = (n choose k) * [tex]p^k[/tex] * [tex](1 - p)^{(n - k)[/tex]

Plugging in the values, we get:

P(X = 3) = (8 choose 3) * (1/8)³ * (7/8)⁵ = 0.2218

P(X = 4) = (8 choose 4) * (1/8)⁴ * (7/8)⁴ = 0.2931

P(X = 5) = (8 choose 5) * (1/8)⁵ * (7/8)³ = 0.2345

P(X = 6) = (8 choose 6) * (1/8)⁶ * (7/8)² = 0.1025

P(X = 7) = (8 choose 7) * (1/8)⁷ * (7/8) = 0.0224

Therefore, the probability of guessing between 3 and 7 correct responses on the test is:

P(3 <= X <= 7) = 0.2218 + 0.2931 + 0.2345 + 0.1025 + 0.0224 = 0.8743

To learn more about probability click on,

https://brainly.com/question/29251004

#SPJ4

The amount of money required to fund the endowment is $200, rounded to the nearest dollar based on interest rate.

To solve this problem, we will use the present value annuity formula:

[tex]PV = mP/r * (1 - e^(-r*T))[/tex]

where PV is the present value of the annuity, m is the periodic payment ($5,000 in this case), P is the principal amount, r is the annual interest rate (0.04 or 4% in this case), and T is the number of years.

Since the income stream goes on forever, we can take the limit as T approaches infinity. When T approaches infinity, the term[tex]e^(-r*T)[/tex]approaches 0. So, the formula becomes:

PV = mP/r

We need to find the amount of money required to fund the endowment (P). We can rearrange the formula to solve for P:

P = PV * r / m

We are given the annual effective rate of interest (r) as 4.0% compounded continuously, and the award amount (m) as $5,000. Plugging these values into the formula:

P = PV * 0.04 / 5,000

Since PV is equal to the amount of money required to fund the endowment, we can simply solve for P:

P = (5,000 * 0.04) / 5,000

P = 0.04 * 5,000 / 5,000

P = 0.04 * 1

P = 0.04

Now, we need to find the present value (PV) using P:

PV = 0.04 * 5,000

PV = 200

So, the amount of money required to fund the endowment is $200, rounded to the nearest dollar.

Learn more about interest rate here:

https://brainly.com/question/17596799

#SPJ11

The derivative of the given function is x/(7√(x²+49)) -x²/(49(x²+49)√(x²/49+1)) + 2x.

To find the derivative of the given function, we can use the chain rule and the power rule of differentiation. Let's first find the derivative of the inside function, sinh⁻¹(x/7), which is (1/√(1+(x/7)²)) * (1/7). Using the chain rule, we have:

dy/dx = [1/√(1+(x/7)²)] * (1/7) * (1) + (x/7) * [1/√(1+(x/7)²)] * (-1/(7²)) + 2x

Simplifying this expression, we get:

dy/dx = (1/7√(1+(x/7)²)) - (x/(49√(1+(x/7)²))) + 2x

Now we can substitute the given values of y and simplify the expression further. Thus, the derivative of y is:

dy/dx = x/(7√(x²+49)) - x²/(49(x²+49)√(x²/49+1)) + 2x

To learn more about derivative click on,

https://brainly.com/question/29020856

#SPJ4

Paul jumps  63 inches further than the other person.

To find this, we need to find the difference between the two lengths,

We know that someone jumps 2 yards and 9 inches.

And Paul jumps 4 yards.

Let's convert the two lengths to inches, we know that:

1 yard = 36 inches

Then:

2 yards=  2*36 in = 72 inches.

4 yards = 4*36 in = 144 inches.

So we can rerwrite:

Someone jumps 72 in + 9 in = 81 inches.

Paul jumps 144 inches.

The difference is:

144 in - 81in = 63 in

That is the answer.

Learn more about differences at.

https://brainly.com/question/17695139

#SPJ1

The currently accepted age of the Solar System, based on dates for components of carbonaceous chondrites, is approximately 4.6 billion years old.

The currently accepted age of the Solar System based on dates for components of carbonaceous chondrites is approximately 4.6 billion years. This age is determined by measuring the isotopic ratios of certain elements in these meteorites, such as uranium and lead, which can be used to calculate the time since the formation of the Solar System. This age has been confirmed through multiple methods, including radiometric dating of rocks on Earth and the Moon, and is widely accepted by the scientific community.
The current accepted age of the Solar System, based on dates for components of carbonaceous chondrites, is approximately 4.6 billion years old.

learn more about Solar System,

https://brainly.com/question/12075871

#SPJ11

the bus travels approximately 4.8 km between the first stop (Fison Road) and the last stop (Coleridge Road). If we need to give the answer to 1 decimal place, we can round this to 4.8 km to 1 decimal place.

How to solve the question?

To work out the distance travelled by the bus between the stops, we need to first determine the order of the stops and the distance between them.

From the given information, we know that the bus travels from Fison Road to Ditton Walk to Napier Street to Emmanuel Street to Railway Station to Coleridge Road. We can use a map or online resource to find the distances between these stops.

Assuming that the bus travels along the most direct route between the stops, the distances between the stops are as follows:

Fison Road to Ditton Walk: approximately 0.6 km

Ditton Walk to Napier Street: approximately 0.9 km

Napier Street to Emmanuel Street: approximately 1.1 km

Emmanuel Street to Railway Station: approximately 0.8 km

Railway Station to Coleridge Road: approximately 1.4 km

To find the total distance travelled by the bus, we can add up the distances between each pair of stops.

Total distance = 0.6 km + 0.9 km + 1.1 km + 0.8 km + 1.4 km

= 4.8 km

Therefore, the bus travels approximately 4.8 km between the first stop (Fison Road) and the last stop (Coleridge Road). If we need to give the answer to 1 decimal place, we can round this to 4.8 km to 1 decimal place.

To know more about distance visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/26550516

#SPJ1

a single expression that represents the capacity of both gas tanks combined the combined capacity of both gas tanks is "15x2 + 0x + 0", which can be simplified to "15x2".

An expression is a mathematical phrase that combines numbers, variables, and operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

Capacity refers to the maximum amount that something can hold, such as the volume of a container or the number of people that can be accommodated in a room.

According to the given information:

To find the combined capacity of both gas tanks, we need to add the volumes of the two tanks. So we have:

Combined capacity = volume of larger tank + volume of smaller tank

= (8x^2 + 2x - 1) + (7x^2 - 2x + 1)

Simplifying this expression by combining like terms, we get:

Combined capacity = 15x^2

Therefore, the capacity of both gas tanks combined can be represented by the expression "15x^2". This is a single term polynomial expression that represents the total capacity of the two gas tanks in cubic inches.

To know more about expression and capacity visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18454078

#SPJ1

If the half life of "molybdenum-99" is 67 hours, then to decay to 25% of its original activity, it will take (c) 134 hours.

The "Half-life" is a term used in radioactive decay to describe the time it takes for half of the atoms in a sample of a radioactive substance to undergo decay. It is a characteristic property of each radioactive isotope, and it represents the time it takes for half of the initial amount of the radioactive substance to decay.

The half life is : [tex]t_{\frac{1}{2} }[/tex] = 67 hours,

To decay 25% of original-activity, means 1/4 th of "initial-amount",

Let,  100 gm molybdenum-99 compound is present, So, after 67 hours, the compound will reduce to 50 gm, and

Further the remaining "50 gm" of compound will decay to its half value in 67 hours,

So, in 2 half-cycles the compound will be reduced to (1/4)th of its "initial-amount",

So, The molybdenum will decay to its 25% in = 67 + 67 = 134 hours.

Therefore, the correct option is (c).

Learn more about Half Life here

https://brainly.com/question/15575933

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

How long will it take a sample of molybdenum-99 (half-life 67 hours) to decay to 25% of its original activity?

(a) 67 hours

(b) 201 hours

(c) 134 hours

(d) 4.0 hours

Our assumption must be false, and the runner must have been running at least 11 mi/hr at least twice during the race.

We have,

To understand why the runner must have been running at least 11 mi/hr twice during the 6.2-mile race, we need to use some basic mathematical reasoning and apply the formula:

Speed = Distance / Time

We know that the runner completed the entire 6.2-mile race in 32 minutes, which is equivalent to 0.533 hours (32/60).

Using the formula above, we can calculate the average speed of the runner during the entire race as:

Average speed = 6.2 / 0.533

Average speed = 11.63 mi/hr (rounded to two decimal places)

So we know that the average speed of the runner during the entire race was 11.63 mi/hr.

However, this doesn't necessarily mean that the runner was running at that speed the entire time.

It's possible that the runner ran slower at some points and faster at others, as long as the average speed over the entire race is 11.63 mi/hr.

Now, suppose for the sake of contradiction that the runner never ran at least 11 mi/hr during the race.

That means that the runner's maximum speed during the race was less than 11 mi/hr. Let's call this maximum speed "v".

Then, we can use the formula above to calculate the minimum amount of time it would take the runner to complete the entire race at this maximum speed:

Time = Distance / Speed

Time = 6.2 / v

Now, we know that the runner completed the entire race in 32 minutes or 0.533 hours.

So we can set up the following inequality:

0.533 > 6.2 / v

Multiplying both sides by v and rearranging, we get:

v > 6.2 / 0.533

v > 11.63 mi/hr

But this contradicts our assumption that the runner's maximum speed was less than 11 mi/hr!

Therefore,

Our assumption must be false, and the runner must have been running at least 11 mi/hr at least twice during the race.

Learn more about speed here:

https://brainly.com/question/7359669

#SPJ4

    5 (4 + √3)/13 is the solution linear equation.

What is  linear equation?

An algebraic equation with simply a constant and a first- order( direct) element, similar as y = mx b, where m is the pitch and b is the y- intercept, is known as a linear equation.

                         The below is sometimes appertained to as a" direct equation of two variables," where y and x are the variables. Equations whose variables have a power of one are called direct equations. One illustration with only one variable is where layoff b = 0, where a and b are real values and x is the variable.

5/4 - √3

Multiply by 4 + √3 in nominator and dinominator .

[tex]\frac{5}{4 - \sqrt{3} } * \frac{4 + \sqrt{3} }{4 + \sqrt{3} }[/tex]

=   5 (4 + √3)/(4)² - (√3)²

=  5 (4 + √3)/16 - 3

=   5 (4 + √3)/13

Learn more about Linear equation

brainly.com/question/11897796

#SPJ1

As a result, the simplified formulation with a rationalized denominator is as follows:

= [tex]\frac{20 + 5\sqrt{3} }{`13} \\[/tex]

deno

To rationalize the denominator, multiply both the numerator and the denominator by the denominator's conjugate, which is 4 + sqrt(3):

[tex]\frac{5}{(4-\sqrt{3} ) } * \frac{(4+\sqrt{3} )}{(4+\sqrt{3} )}[/tex]

Using the distributive property to simplify the numerator and denominator, we get:

= [tex]\frac{5(4+\sqrt{3} )}{(4-\sqrt{3} )(4+\sqrt{3} ) } }[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{20 + 5\sqrt{3} }{`16-3} \\[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{20 + 5\sqrt{3} }{`13} \\[/tex]

As a result, the simplified formulation with a rationalized denominator is as follows:

= [tex]\frac{20 + 5\sqrt{3} }{`13} \\[/tex]

Learn more about simplification here:

https://brainly.com/question/2804192

#SPJ1

The [tex]$x$[/tex]-coordinate of the other [tex]$x$[/tex]-intercept is [tex]$\boxed{3-2\sqrt{39}}$[/tex].

Since the vertex of the parabola is[tex]$(3,7)$[/tex], we know that the axis of symmetry is[tex]$x=3$[/tex]. Since [tex]$(-2,0)$[/tex] is one of the[tex]$x$[/tex]-intercepts, we can write the quadratic equation in factored form as:

[tex]$$y=a(x+2)\left(x-x_1\right)$$[/tex]

where [tex]$\$ x_{-} 1 \$$[/tex] is the [tex]$\$ \times \$$[/tex]-coordinate of the other [tex]$\$ \times \$$[/tex]-intercept.

We know that the vertex is on the axis of symmetry, so we can use this information to find the value of [tex]$\$ x_{-} 1 \$$[/tex]. Since the axis of symmetry is [tex]$\$ \mathrm{x}=3 \$$[/tex], the distance between the vertex at [tex]$\$(3,7) \$$[/tex] and the[tex]$\$ \times \$$[/tex]-intercept at [tex]$\$(-2,0) \$$[/tex] must be the same as the distance between the vertex and the other [tex]$\$ \times \$$[/tex]-intercept, which we don't know yet.

The distance between [tex]$\$(3,7) \$$[/tex] and [tex]$\$(-2,0) \$$[/tex] is:

[tex]$$\sqrt{(3-(-2))^2+(7-0)^2}=\sqrt{25+49}=2 \sqrt{39}$$[/tex]

So the distance between the vertex and the other [tex]$\$ \times \$$[/tex]-intercept is also [tex]$\$ 2$[/tex] |sqrt[tex]$\{39\} \$$[/tex]. This means that the[tex]$\$ \times \$$[/tex]-coordinate of the other [tex]$\$ \times \$$[/tex]-intercept must be [tex]$\$ 3+2 \mid$[/tex] sqrt [tex]$\{39\} \$$[/tex] or [tex]$\$ 3$[/tex] 21 sqrt [tex]$\{39\} \$$[/tex].

So the distance between the vertex and the other [tex]$x$[/tex]-intercept is also

[tex]$2\sqrt{39}$[/tex]. This means that the [tex]$x$[/tex]-coordinate of the other [tex]$x$[/tex]-intercept must be [tex]$3+2\sqrt{39}$[/tex] or [tex]$3-2\sqrt{39}$[/tex].

Therefore, the [tex]$x$[/tex]-coordinate of the other [tex]$x$[/tex]-intercept is [tex]$\boxed{3-2\sqrt{39}}$[/tex].

To learn more about information visit:

https://brainly.com/question/2716412

#SPJ11

Answer: 0.875

Step-by-step explanation: You simply divide the 7 by 8 to get the percentage

The number of shaded blocks on figure 35 is given as follows:

148 blocks. (option 2).

An arithmetic sequence is a sequence of values in which the difference between consecutive terms is constant and is called common difference d.

The nth term of an arithmetic sequence is given by the explicit formula presented as follows:

[tex]a_n = a_1 + (n - 1)d[/tex]

The first term of the sequence is the number of shaded blocks on Figure 1, which is of:

[tex]a_1 = 12[/tex]

For each new figure, the number of blocks is increased by 4, hence the common difference is given as follows:

d = 4.

Then the number of shaded blocks on Figure n is given as follows:

[tex]a_n = 12 + 4(n - 1)[/tex]

For Figure 35, the number of blocks is given as follows:

12 + 4 x 34 = 148 blocks.

More can be learned about arithmetic sequences at https://brainly.com/question/6561461

#SPJ1

The probability of at least one shared birthday in a group of 20 people is about 0.412 or 41.2%

The probability of at least two people sharing a birthday in a group of n people can be calculated using the following formula:

P(at least two people share a birthday) = 1 - P(no two people share a birthday)

For simplicity, let's assume that all birthdays are equally likely, and that there are 365 possible birthdays (ignoring leap years).

For the first person, any day can be their birthday, so the probability is 1.

For the second person, the probability that their birthday is different from the first person's birthday is 364/365.

For the third person, the probability that their birthday is different from the first two people's birthdays is 363/365.

And so on, until we reach the 20th person:

P(no two people share a birthday) = 1 * 364/365 * 363/365 * ... * 347/365

Using a calculator, we can calculate this probability to be approximately 0.588.

Therefore, the probability that at least two people share a birthday in a group of 20 people is:

P(at least two people share a birthday) = 1 - P(no two people share a birthday) = 1 - 0.588 = 0.412

So the probability of at least one shared birthday in a group of 20 people is about 0.412 or 41.2%

learn about probability here,

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The correct answer is: c. decrease.  As variability due to chance decreases, the value of F will decrease

The F statistic is a measure of the ratio of variability between groups to variability within groups in an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. It is calculated by taking the ratio of the mean square between groups (MSB) to the mean square within groups (MSW). A larger value of F indicates that the variability between groups is greater than the variability within groups, which suggests that there may be a significant effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable.

As variability due to chance decreases, it means that the variability within groups is decreasing. This could be due to a decrease in random errors or chance fluctuations in the data. When the variability within groups decreases, it makes the denominator (MSW) in the F statistic smaller, which in turn increases the value of F. Therefore, as variability due to chance decreases, the value of F will decrease, indicating that the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable is becoming more significant and reliable.

In conclusion, the correct answer is: c. decrease. Therefore, as variability due to chance decreases, the value of F will decrease

To learn more about variability here:

brainly.com/question/2544440#

#SPJ11

The cost of materials is 245.31 dollar

Given, Volume = 10 m³, Width = x, Length = 2x

Base area = 2x²

Cost of base = $15

Cost of sides = $9

Since the volume is 10 m²

Volume = base area × height

The height has to be 10/ 2x²

= 5 /x²

The cost of making such container

Cost of base = 2x²(15)

= $30x².

Cost of sides = [(2 × 2x × 5 /x²) +(2 × x × 5 /x²)](9)

= $270/x.

The overall cost = Cost of base + Cost of sides

f(x) = 30x² + 270/x.

= 30(x² + 9/x)

To get the minimum, let us find the first derivative of f(x) and equate it to zero.

df(x)/dx = 30(2x - 9/x²) = 0

2x - 9/x² = 0

2x³ = 9

x³ = 4.5

So, x = 1.651 (m)

f(x)= 30x² + 270/x

=30(1.651)² + 270/(1.651)

=81.77 + 163.53

= 245.31 dollars.

Therefore, the cost of materials is 245.31 dollars.

Learn more about derivatives, click;

https://brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ4

The complete ques is -

A rectangular storage container with an open top is to have a volume of 10 m3. The length of this base is twice the width. Material for the base costs $15 per square meter. Material for the sides costs $9 per square meter. Find the cost of materials for the cheapest such container. (Round your answer to the nearest cent.)

The composite functions of f(x) and g(x) are given as follows:

(option D).

The composite function of f(x) and g(x) is given by the function rule presented as follows:

(f ∘ g)(x) = f(g(x)).

For the composition of two functions, we have that the output of the inner function, which in this example is given by g(x), serves as the input of the outer function, which in this example is given by f(x).

The functions for this problem are given as follows:

Hence the composite function of f and g is given as follows:

(f ∘ g)(x) = f(-2x) = (-2x)² - 1 = 4x² - 1.

The composite function of g and f is given as follows:

(g ∘ f)(x) = f(x² - 1) = -2(x² - 1) = -2x² + 2.

More can be learned about composite functions at https://brainly.com/question/10687170

#SPJ1

Answer:

95%

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the given information, the confidence interval (4, 10) has been constructed using a sample size of 52 and a known population standard deviation of 17.638. To determine the confidence level used for this interval, we can compare the interval to the standard normal distribution (Z-distribution) for the corresponding critical values.

The formula for the confidence interval for a population mean with known standard deviation is given by:

Confidence interval = Sample mean ± (Z critical value * (Population standard deviation / sqrt(sample size)))

In this case, the given confidence interval is (4, 10), which represents the range of possible values for the population mean. The sample mean is not provided in the given information, so we cannot determine the exact confidence level used.

However, based on the provided answer choices, the closest match to the given confidence interval would be a 95% confidence level. This is because the confidence interval (4, 10) is quite wide, which corresponds to a higher level of confidence. A 95% confidence level is commonly used in many statistical analyses as it provides a high level of confidence in the estimated interval. Therefore, the most likely answer would be 95%.

The expression 18a3b2/2ab3 can be written in simplified exponential notation as 9a2b-1.

Expression in math is an arrangement of numbers, symbols, and operations used to represent an amount or a value. It can be a single number, a combination of numbers, or even an equation. Expressions can be used to calculate a value in an equation or to simplify an expression to find the answer to a problem. Expressions can also be used to represent relationships between variables and to represent functions.

The expression 18a3b2/2ab3 can be written in simplified exponential notation as 9a2b-1. To simplify the expression, first divide both the numerator and denominator by 2ab3, which results in 9a2b-1. This is the simplified exponential form of the expression.

The process of simplifying the expression involves breaking down the numerator and denominator into their prime factors. The numerator is 18a3b2 and can be written as 2*2*3*3*a3*b2. The denominator is 2ab3 and can be written as 2*a*b3. Next, the common factors of the numerator and denominator are identified and cancelled out. In this case, the common factor is 2. Once the common factor is cancelled out, the numerator becomes 3*3*a3*b2 and the denominator becomes a*b3. The final step involves combining the remaining factors in the numerator and denominator. The numerator can be written as 9a2b2 and the denominator can be written as a*b3. The simplified exponential form of the expression is 9a2b-1.

In conclusion, the expression 18a3b2/2ab3 can be written in simplified exponential notation as 9a2b-1. This form is obtained by breaking down the numerator and denominator into their prime factors, identifying and cancelling out the common factors and then combining the remaining factors.

To know more about expression click-
http://brainly.com/question/1859113
#SPJ1

Answer:

I think the expresion will be [tex]9a2b-1[/tex]

Let me know if this is wrong and I will try and fix it.

The range of the annual incomes is $18,000.

The arithmetic mean income is $129,600.

The population variance is $40,240, and the standard deviation is $6,344.

(a) The range is calculated by subtracting the lowest value from the highest value:
$140,000 - $122,000 = $18,000
Range: $18,000

(b) The arithmetic mean income is calculated by adding up all the incomes and dividing by the number of incomes:
($125,000 + $128,000 + $122,000 + $133,000 + $140,000) / 5 = $129,600
Arithmetic mean income: $129,600

(c) The population variance is calculated by taking the sum of the squared differences between each income and the mean income, and dividing by the number of incomes:
[($125,000 - $129,600)^2 + ($128,000 - $129,600)^2 + ($122,000 - $129,600)^2 + ($133,000 - $129,600)^2 + ($140,000 - $129,600)^2] / 5 = $40,240
Population variance: $40,240
The standard deviation is the square root of the population variance:  √$40,240 = $6,344
Standard deviation: $6,344

(a) The range of the annual incomes is $18,000.

(b) The arithmetic mean income is $129,600.

(c) The population variance is $40,240, and the standard deviation is $6,344.

To know more about standard deviation: brainly.com/question/13905583

#SPJ11

The point estimate for the population proportion of customers who spend more than $100 is 0.373

To estimate this proportion, the manager randomly selects 150 customers and determines that 56 of them have purchases totaling more than $100. This sample proportion, denoted by p, is calculated by dividing the number of customers who spent more than $100 by the total number of customers sampled:

p = 56/150

This gives a point estimate for the population proportion of customers who spend more than $100. To find the value of p to at least three decimals of accuracy, we can divide 56 by 150 using a calculator:

p = 0.373333...

This means that the manager estimates that 37.3% of all customers spend more than $100 on their purchases.

To know more about proportion here

https://brainly.com/question/30657439

#SPJ4

The minimum average cost per unit for the given cost function is x ≈ 116 (Round to the nearest whole number as needed.).

Cost function for the product,

C(x) = 0.002x³ + 8x + 6,244

Production level that produces the minimum average cost per unit  C(x),

First find the average cost per unit,

AC(x) = C(x)/x

Substituting the given cost function C(x), we get,

⇒ AC(x) = (0.002x³ + 8x + 6,244)/x

Simplifying this expression, we get,

⇒AC(x) = 0.002x² + 8 + 6,244/x

The value of x that minimizes AC(x) take the derivative of AC(x) with respect to x, set it equal to zero,

⇒ d(AC(x))/dx = 0.004x - 6,244/x²

⇒0.004x - 6,244/x² = 0

Multiplying both sides by x^2, we get,

⇒ 0.004x³ - 6,244 = 0

Solving for x, we get,

⇒ x = ∛6,244/0.004

⇒ x ≈ 116 (Round to the nearest whole number as needed.)

Therefore, the production level that will produce the minimum average cost per unit is approximately 116.

learn more about average cost here

brainly.com/question/9835337

#SPJ4

ignore this i accidentally clicked

To assess the fundamentally, we utilized the distributive property of integrand to isolate the fundamentally into three parts, one for each term within the integrand. We at that point connected the control run the show of integration to each part to discover its antiderivative.

For the primary term, -x²/2, we raised the control by 1 and partitioned by the modern control to induce -x³/6. We at that point assessed this antiderivative at the upper and lower limits of integration, 4 and 1, individually, and found the contrast between the two values to urge (-1/6) - (-64/6) = 63/6.

For the moment term, 3x, we raised the control by 1 and partitioned by the unused control to urge 3x²/2. We at that point assessed this antiderivative at the upper and lower limits of integration, 4 and 1, separately, and found the contrast between the two values to urge (3/2) - 24 = -21/2.

For the third term, -5/2, we coordinates a consistent and used the control run the show to induce -5x/2. We at that point assessed this antiderivative at the upper and lower limits of integration, 4 and 1, individually, and found the distinction between the two values to urge (5/2) - 10 = -5/2.

At long last, we included the comes about for each term to urge the arrangement to the indispensably, which is 31/3. 

To learn about integration visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ4

The given integral eˣ / 1+eˣ dx approaches infinity as x approaches infinity, and the integral diverges.

To determine whether the improper integral ∫ eˣ / (1+eˣ) dx converges or diverges, we need to evaluate its antiderivative and check for convergence.

Let u = 1+eˣ, then du/dx = eˣ, and dx = du/eˣ. Substituting these into the integral, we get:

∫ eˣ / (1+eˣ) dx = ∫ du/u = ln|1+eˣ| + C

As x approaches infinity, eˣ approaches infinity, and so 1+eˣ approaches infinity. Therefore, ln|1+eˣ| approaches infinity as x approaches infinity, and the integral diverges.

Similarly, as x approaches negative infinity, eˣ approaches zero, and so 1+eˣ approaches 1. Therefore, ln|1+eˣ| approaches 0 as x approaches negative infinity, and the integral converges.

Therefore, the improper integral converges for x → -∞ and diverges for x → ∞.

To learn more about integral click on,

https://brainly.com/question/31476224

#SPJ4

Using functions, we can find that the input for the function here for the value of x will be = 28.

The core concept of calculus in mathematics is a function. The relations are certain kinds of the functions. In mathematics, a function is a rule that produces a different result for every input x. Typically, these functions are denoted by letters like f, g, and h. The set of all potential values that can be passed into a function while it is specified is known as the domain. The entire set of values that the function's output is capable of producing is referred to as the "range" in this context. The range of potential values for a function's outputs is known as the co-domain.

Given in the question,

f (x) = x/4 - 5

Output, y = 2.

Now,

y = f (x)

2 = x/4 - 5

Adding 5 on both the sides:

7 = x/4

Cross multiplying:

x = 28.

To know more about functions, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28303908

#SPJ1

If the null hypothesis is rejected, Spectrum Cable can conclude that more advertising is needed to retain market share. If the null hypothesis is not rejected, Spectrum Cable may want to consider alternative strategies to retain customers.

What is statistics?

Statistics is a branch of mathematics that deals with the collection, analysis, interpretation, presentation, and organization of numerical data.

To conduct a hypothesis test to determine whether more advertising is needed, the following steps should be taken:

Define the null and alternative hypotheses:

Null hypothesis (H0): The true proportion of homes with broadband-delivered video is not greater than 0.30.

Alternative hypothesis (Ha): The true proportion of homes with broadband-delivered video is greater than 0.30.

Determine the level of significance (α) and the test statistic. Let's assume a significance level of 0.05 and use the z-test for proportions.

Collect a random sample of homes in the city and determine the proportion of homes with broadband-delivered video.

Calculate the test statistic z using the formula:

z = (p - p0) / √(p0(1-p0) / n)

where p is the sample proportion, p0 is the hypothesized proportion under the null hypothesis, and n is the sample size.

Determine the p-value associated with the test statistic using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator.

Compare the p-value to the significance level α. If the p-value is less than α, reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence to support the alternative hypothesis. If the p-value is greater than or equal to α, fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is insufficient evidence to support the alternative hypothesis.

Interpret the results and make a decision.

If the null hypothesis is rejected, Spectrum Cable can conclude that more advertising is needed to retain market share. If the null hypothesis is not rejected, Spectrum Cable may want to consider alternative strategies to retain customers.

To learn more about statistics from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/28053564

#SPJ1

Using the equation of a regression line, the best predicted value for y given x = 9 is 30.

A regression line, also known as a trendline, is a straight line that represents the relationship between two variables in a scatter plot. It is a mathematical model used to describe the linear relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables.

The best predicted value for y given x = 9 can be found by plugging x = 9 into the equation of the regression line and solving for y. Thus, the predicted value for y is:

y = 4(9) - 6
y = 36 - 6
y = 30

Therefore, the best predicted value for y given x = 9 is 30, assuming that the variables x and y have a significant correlation.

Learn more about regression line here: https://brainly.com/question/26755306

#SPJ11

The value of the integral is 1/2. Your answer is: A. 1/2

the integral ∫(0 to ∞) x/(1+x²)² dx. Let's evaluate the integral and see which option fits:

The integral in question is:
∫(0 to ∞) x/(1+x²)² dx

To solve this integral, we can use the substitution method:
Let u = 1 + x². Then, du = 2x dx.

Now, we change the limits of integration:
When x = 0, u = 1 + 0² = 1.
When x -> ∞, u -> ∞.

Now, we substitute x and dx in the integral and update the limits:
∫(1 to ∞) (1/2) du/u²

This is an improper integral, so we have to take the limit as b -> ∞:
lim(b -> ∞) ∫(1 to b) (1/2) du/u²

Now, we integrate with respect to u:
lim(b -> ∞) [-1/2 * 1/u] evaluated from 1 to b

Now, evaluate the limit:
lim(b -> ∞) [-1/2 * (1/b - 1)]

As b -> ∞, 1/b -> 0:
-1/2 * (-1) = 1/2

So, the value of the integral is 1/2. Your answer is:
A. 1/2

Learn more about definite integral.

brainly.com/question/29685762

#SPJ11