A commodity has a demand function modeled by p = 117 - 0.5x and a total cost function modeled by C = 40x + 31.75, where x is the number of units. (a) What price yields a maximum profit? $ ____ per unit (b) When the profit is maximized, what is the average cost per unit? (Round your answer to two decimal places.) $ ____ per unit

The derivative of the function is h'(z) = -e^(-z)

Given data ,

Let the function be represented as h ( z )

Now , the value of h ( z ) is

h(z) = e^(-2z/2)

To find the derivative of h(z) with respect to z, we can use the chain rule. The derivative of e^u, where u is a function of z, is given by e^u * du/dz.

In this case, u = -2z/2, so du/dz = -2/2 = -1. Therefore, we have:

h'(z) = e^(-2z/2) * (-1).

On further simplification , we get

h'(z) = -e^(-z)

Hence , the derivative of the function is h'(z) = -e^(-z)

To learn more about derivative of a function click :

https://brainly.com/question/29005833

#SPJ4

The fluid ounces of water that Joshua would drink would be = 64 ounces of water.

To calculate the quantity of water Joshua take per day is to convert the cup of water into ounce in measurement.

The total number of cups he take per day = 8 cups of water

But 1 cup of water = 8 fluid ounces

8 cups of water = 8×8

= 64 ounces

Learn more about Volume here:

https://brainly.com/question/27710307

#SPJ1

Complete question:

Joshua drinks 8 cups of water a day. The recommened daily amount is given in fluid ounces. How many fluid ounces of water does he drink each day?

Based on the given conditions, it is not justified to test a claim about a population mean (μ) using a normal distribution, as the original population is not normally distributed.

To determine whether it is justified to test a claim about a population mean (μ), we need to consider the sample size (n), the population standard deviation (σ), and the distribution of the original population.

Sample size (n): The given sample size is n = 49, which is considered large according to the Central Limit Theorem. Large sample sizes (typically n ≥ 30) tend to produce sample means that are normally distributed, regardless of the shape of the original population. However, this condition alone is not sufficient to justify testing a claim about a population mean using a normal distribution.

Population standard deviation (σ): The given population standard deviation is σ = 12.3, which is known. When the population standard deviation is known, it is appropriate to use a z-test to test a claim about a population mean, assuming other conditions are met. However, this condition alone is not sufficient to justify testing a claim about a population mean using a normal distribution.

Distribution of the original population: The given condition states that the original population is not normally distributed. This is an important factor to consider when testing a claim about a population mean. If the original population is not normally distributed, it may not be appropriate to use a normal distribution for hypothesis testing, as the assumptions of the test may not be met.

Therefore, based on the given conditions, it is not justified to test a claim about a population mean using a normal distribution, as the original population is not normally distributed. Alternative methods, such as non-parametric tests, should be considered for hypothesis testing in this case.

To learn more about population mean here:

brainly.com/question/19538277#

#SPJ11

We can use an F-test to determine if there is evidence of a difference in variation between the two populations. The null hypothesis is that the variances of the two populations are equal, and the alternative hypothesis is that they are not equal. We can calculate the F-test statistic as:

F = s1^2 / s2^2

where s1^2 and s2^2 are the sample variances for the two groups. We can then compare this to the F-distribution with (n1-1) and (n2-1) degrees of freedom.

Using the data given, we have:

n1 = 6

n2 = 8

s1^2 = 6.505

s2^2 = 5.811

So, our F-test statistic is:

F = s1^2 / s2^2 = 1.119

Using an F-table or calculator with (5,7) degrees of freedom, we find the critical value of F for a 0.10 significance level to be 3.11.

Since our calculated F-value (1.119) is less than the critical value (3.11), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to suggest a difference in the variation of the cracking torsion moments between the two types of T-beams. (1.119) is less than the critical value (3.11), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not enough evidence to suggest a difference in the variation of the cracking torsion moments between the two types of T-beams.

Learn more about null hypothesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

We prove: 2nYn - Z22 where Y = - In (X(n)-1/) θ-1).

To show that [tex]2nYn - Z^2[/tex] is equal to the given expression, we will first find the distribution of Y and Z.

Let's start with Y.

Since X(1), the minimum order statistic, is also from the same uniform distribution on (1,θ),

we can write:

P(X(1) > x) = P(X > x) = (θ - x) / (θ - 1)

where 1 < x < θ.

Thus, the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of X(n) can be written as:

[tex]F_X(n)(x)[/tex]= P(X(n) ≤ x) = [P(X ≤ [tex]x)]^n[/tex] =[tex][1 - (\theta - x)/(\theta - 1)]^n[/tex]

Taking the derivative of the CDF with respect to x, we get the probability density function (PDF) of X(n):

[tex]f_X(n)(x) = n(\theta - x)^{n-1} / (\theta - 1)^n[/tex]

Now, let's define Y as:

Y = -ln(X(n) - 1) / θ - 1

We can find the distribution of Y by using the probability transformation technique.

Let's start by finding the CDF of Y:

[tex]F_Y(y) =[/tex]P(Y ≤ y) [tex]= P(-ln(X(n) - 1) / \theta - 1[/tex] ≤ y)

Multiplying both sides by -θ - 1 and rearranging, we get:

P(X(n) ≤ [tex]e^(-\theta (y+1)) + 1) =[/tex] [tex]F_X(n)(e^{-\theta (y+1}) + 1[/tex]

Taking the derivative of both sides with respect to y, we get the PDF of Y:

[tex]f_Y(y) = n\theta e^{-\theta(y+1})(\theta - e^{-\theta(y+1}))^(n-1) / (\theta - 1)^n[/tex]

Now, let's move on to Z.

The maximum likelihood estimator of θ is X(n), so we can define Z as:

Z = (n / (n-1))(X(n) - X(1))

We can find the distribution of Z by using the order statistics method. The joint PDF of X(1) and X(n) is:

[tex]f_(X(1), X(n))(x(1), x(n)) = n(n-1)(x(n) - x(1))^{n-2}/ (\theta - 1)^n[/tex]

The distribution of Z can be found by finding the CDF and then taking the derivative with respect to z:

[tex]F_Z(z)[/tex] = P(Z ≤ z) = P((n / (n-1))(X(n) - X(1)) ≤ z)

Multiplying both sides by (n-1) / n and rearranging, we get:

P(X(n) ≤ (n-1)z/n + X(1)) = F_X(n)((n-1)z/n + X(1))

Taking the derivative of both sides with respect to z, we get the PDF of Z:

[tex]f_Z(z) = n(n-1)(n-2)z^{n-3} / (\theta - 1)^n[/tex]

Now that we have the distributions of Y and Z, let's calculate [tex]E[2nYn - Z^2]:[/tex]

[tex]E[2nYn - Z^2] = 2nE[Y] - E[Z^2][/tex]

We can find E[Y] by integrating y times the PDF of Y:

E[Y] = ∫(-∞,∞)[tex]yf_Y(y)dy[/tex]

We can find[tex]E[Z^2][/tex] by integrating[tex]z^2[/tex]  times the PDF.

For similar question on prove.

https://brainly.com/question/30273654

#SPJ11

The probability model is as follows:
Never: 0.0262
Rarely: 0.0679
Sometimes: 0.1156
Most of the time: 0.2633
Always: 0.5271

To construct a probability model for seatbelt use by a passenger, first calculate the total number of responses in the survey:

Total responses = 125 (Never) + 324 (Rarely) + 552 (Sometimes) + 1257 (Most of the time) + 2518 (Always) = 4776

Now, find the probability for each response by dividing the frequency of each response by the total number of responses:

P(Never) = 125 / 4776 = 0.0262
P(Rarely) = 324 / 4776 = 0.0679
P(Sometimes) = 552 / 4776 = 0.1156
P(Most of the time) = 1257 / 4776 = 0.2633
P(Always) = 2518 / 4776 = 0.5271


Considering that the probability of a college student never wearing a seatbelt when riding in a car driven by someone else is only 0.0262, or 2.62%, it can be considered unusual. This low probability indicates that the majority of college students wear seatbelts at least some of the time, making those who never wear them an exception to the general behavior.

Know more about probability model here:

https://brainly.com/question/31142424

#SPJ11

Answer:

-------------------------

Use the intersecting chords, intersecting secants or intersecting secant and tangent theorems.

=========================

When two chords of a circle intersect within the circle, the product of the segments of one chord is equal to the product of the segments of the other chord.

---------------

If two secant segments are drawn to a circle from an exterior point, then the product of the measures of one secant segment and its external secant segment is equal to the product of the measures of the other secant segment and its external secant segment.

---------------

If a tangent segment and a secant segment are drawn to a circle from an exterior point, then the square of the measure of the tangent segment is equal to the product of the measures of the secant segment and its external secant segment.

The statements with the properties of the parallelogram are

Given that

ABCD is a parallelogram

As a general rule of parallelogram, opposite sides are equal

So, we have

AB = CD and AC = BC

Also, opposite angles are congruent

So, we have

∠A ≅ ∠C and ∠B ≅ ∠D

Read more about parallelogram at

https://brainly.com/question/970600

#SPJ1

The point estimate of the population proportion that failed the test is:

14/400 = 0.035 = 3.5% ,  the margin of error is 0.030 , the 98% confidence interval for the population proportion is between 0.005 and 0.065. No, it is not reasonable to conclude that 6% of the employees cannot pass the company policy test

b. The margin of error can be calculated using the formula:

ME = z√((p-hat(1-p-hat))/n)

where z* is the z-value for the desired confidence level (98% in this case), p-hat is the point estimate of the population proportion, and n is the sample size.

Using a z-value of 2.33 (from a z-table for 98% confidence level), we get:

ME = 2.33sqrt((0.035(1-0.035))/400) = 0.030

Therefore, the margin of error is 0.030.

c. The 98% confidence interval can be calculated as:

CI = p-hat ± ME

where p-hat is the point estimate of the population proportion and ME is the margin of error calculated in part (b).

Substituting the values, we get:

CI = 0.035 ± 0.030

CI = (0.005, 0.065)

Therefore, the 98% confidence interval for the population proportion is between 0.005 and 0.065.

d. No, it is not reasonable to conclude that 6% of the employees cannot pass the company policy test because the point estimate and the confidence interval calculated in parts (a) and (c) do not include 6%. In fact, the upper limit of the confidence interval is only 6.5%, which is lower than 6%.

Learn more about population proportion,

https://brainly.com/question/15087042

#SPJ4

To find the volumes of the solids generated by revolving the region between the curves y = √(4x) and y = x^2/8 about the x-axis and y-axis, we can use the disk or washer method.

a) Volume about the x-axis:

The curves intersect at x = 0 and x = 16. We can set up the integral to find the volume as follows:

V = π∫[0,16] [(r(x))^2 - (R(x))^2] dx

where r(x) is the radius of the inner curve y = √(4x) and R(x) is the radius of the outer curve y = x^2/8.

r(x) = √(4x) and R(x) = x^2/8, so we have:

V = π∫[0,16] [(√(4x))^2 - (x^2/8)^2] dx

= π∫[0,16] [4x - (x^4/64)] dx

= π[2x^2 - (x^5/80)]|[0,16]

≈ 1853.7 cubic units (rounded to one decimal place)

b) Volume about the y-axis:

The curves intersect at x = 0 and x = 16. We can set up the integral to find the volume as follows:

V = π∫[0,4] [(r(y))^2 - (R(y))^2] dy

where r(y) is the radius of the inner curve x = √(y/4) and R(y) is the radius of the outer curve x = 2√y.

r(y) = √(y/4) and R(y) = 2√y, so we have:

V = π∫[0,4] [(√(y/4))^2 - (2√y)^2] dy

= π∫[0,4] [y/4 - 4y] dy

= π[-(15/4)y^2]|[0,4]

= 15π cubic units

Therefore, the volume of the solid generated by revolving the region between y = √(4x) and y = x^2/8 about the x-axis is approximately 1853.7 cubic units (rounded to one decimal place), and the volume of the solid generated by revolving the region about the y-axis is 15π cubic units.

Learn more about inner curve here:

https://brainly.com/question/15651189

#SPJ11

The example given is an example of empirical probability.

Empirical probability, also known as experimental probability, is based on observed data or past experiences. In this case, the homeowner has been noting the arrival time of the newspaper for seven days and has observed that it arrives before 5 pm on five out of those seven days.

Based on this observation, the homeowner concludes that the probability of the newspaper arriving before 5 pm tomorrow is about 71%. This conclusion is based on the homeowner's empirical observation of the newspaper's arrival times in the past, rather than a theoretical calculation or mathematical model.

Therefore, the example given is an example of empirical probability.

To learn more about empirical probability here:

brainly.com/question/1452877#

#SPJ11

The average production level over the region R is approximately 1519.31 units.

To find the average production level, we need to calculate the total

production level over the region R and divide it by the area of R.

The region R is defined by x ranging from 10 to 50 and y ranging from 20

to 40. So, we have:

R = {10 ≤ x ≤ 50, 20 ≤ y ≤ 40}

The total production level over R is given by:

Pavg = 1/A ∬R P(x,y) dA

where dA = dx dy is the area element and A is the area of the region R.

We can evaluate the integral by integrating first with respect to x and then with respect to y:

Pavg = [tex]1/A \int 20^{40} \int 10^{50} P(x,y) dx dy[/tex]

Pavg =[tex]1/A \int 20^{40} \int 10^50 500x^0.2y^0.8 dx dy[/tex]

Pavg =[tex]1/A (500/0.3) \int 20^{40} [x^0.3y^0.8]10^{50} dy[/tex]

Pavg =[tex](500/0.3A) \int 20^{40} [(50^0.3 - 10^0.3)y^0.8] dy[/tex]

Pavg =[tex](500/0.3A) [(50^0.3 - 10^0.3)/0.9] ∫20^{40} y^0.8 dy[/tex]

Pavg =[tex](500/0.3A) [(50^{0.3} - 10^{0.3})/0.9] [(40^{1.8 }- 20^{1.8})/1.8][/tex]

Pavg ≈ 1519.31

Therefore, the average production level over the region R is

approximately 1519.31 units.

for such more question on average

https://brainly.com/question/20118982

#SPJ11

Answer:

you would take 10 and divide that by 16 to get .63, so you take .63 and minus that from 100 and you get 37. so the officer had a 37% decrease.

Step-by-step explanation:

Supposing that W and are random variables, The correct answer is D. 72‾‾‾√.

We know that V(W) = 8, which means that the variance of the random variable W is 8. We also know that X = -3W + 2, which means that X is a linear combination of W.

To find the variance of X, we can use the following property:

Var(aW + b) = a^2 Var(W)

where a and b are constants.

Using this property, we can find the variance of X as follows:

Var(X) = Var(-3W + 2)

= 9 Var(W) (since a = -3)

= 9 * 8 (since Var(W) = 8)

= 72

So we have found that Var(X) = 72.

The standard deviation of X, denoted by (), is the square root of the variance of X. Therefore, we have:

() = sqrt(Var(X))

= [tex]\sqrt{72}[/tex]

= [tex]\sqrt{36 * 2}[/tex]

= [tex]\sqrt{36} *\sqrt{2}[/tex]

= [tex]6 * \sqrt{2}[/tex]

= 4.24 (rounded to two decimal places)

Learn more about variance and covariance of random variables:https://brainly.com/question/30255892

#SPJ11

The accumulated future value of the continuous income stream at rate Rt), for the given time period T = 21 years and interest rate k = 4%, compounded continuously, is $922,297.50.

To find the accumulated future value of the continuous income stream at rate Rt), we can use the formula:

R(U) = (Rt)/(e^(kT))

Where:

R(U) = the accumulated future value of the continuous income stream
Rt = the continuous income stream
k = the interest rate, compounded continuously
T = the given time period

Substituting the given values, we get:

R(U) = (400,000)/(e^(0.04*21))

R(U) = $922,297.50 (rounded to the nearest cent)

Know more about future value here:

https://brainly.com/question/14860893

#SPJ11

The indefinite integral of the function f(x) = 3x + 2 is (3x²/2) + 2x + C, where C is the constant of integration.

An indefinite integral is denoted by ∫ f(x)dx, where f(x) is the function that you want to integrate and dx represents the differential of the independent variable x.

Given the function f(x) = 3x + 2, we need to find its indefinite integral.

∫f(x)dx = ∫(3x + 2)dx

To integrate this function, we need to use the power rule of integration. The power rule of integration states that if f(x) = xn, then ∫f(x)dx = (xⁿ⁺¹)/(n+1) + C, where C is the constant of integration.

Let's apply this rule to integrate the function f(x) = 3x + 2:

∫(3x + 2)dx = (3x¹⁺¹)/(1+1) + 2x + C

= (3x²/2) + 2x + C

Now, we need to find the indefinite integral of the sum of two identical functions, which is given by:

∫f(x)dx + ∫f(x)dx = 2∫f(x)dx

Therefore,

∫f(x)dx + ∫f(x)dx = (3x²/2) + 2x + C + (3x²/2) + 2x + C

= 3x² + 4x + 2C

So, the indefinite integral of f(x) + f(x) is 3x² + 4x + 2C.

To know more about integral here

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

Find the indefinite integral  ∫f(x)dx + ∫ f(x)dx =

Where f(x) = 3x + 2

The collection and summarization of the socioeconomic and physical characteristics of the employees of a particular firm is an example of descriptive statistics.

This is an example of descriptive statistics. Descriptive statistics involves the collection, organization, and summarization of data to describe the characteristics of a population or sample. In this case, the data collected pertains to the employees of a particular firm. On the other hand, inferential statistics involves making inferences and drawing conclusions about a larger population based on data collected from a sample.

Descriptive statistics is the branch of statistics that deals with the collection, analysis, interpretation, and presentation of data.

Learn more about “descriptive statistics “ visit here;

https://brainly.com/question/29821285

#SPJ4

The solution is, 28 miles can he go.

Given that,

The Yellow Cab Taxi charges a flat rate of $3.50 for every cab ride, plus $0.95 per mile.

Tofi needs a ride from the airport.

He only has $30.10 cash.

let, x miles can he go.

so, for x miles, it will charge:

$3.50 + $0.95 x

now, we have,

He only has $30.10 cash.

so, the inequality will be:

$3.50 + $0.95 x ≤ $30.10

or, $0.95 x ≤ 26.60

or, x  ≤ 28

Hence, The solution is, 28 miles can he go.

To learn more on inequality click:

brainly.com/question/24853349

#SPJ1

The probability that Declan will arrive first and Danielle will arrive last is 1/30.

First, let's find the total number of ways the six friends can randomly arrive at the party. Since there are 6 friends, there are 6 (six factorial) ways for them to arrive, which can be calculated as follows:

6! = 6 × 5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 = 720 ways

Now, let's find the number of ways in which Declan can arrive first and Danielle last. In this case, 4 remaining friends (Jose, Tanisha, Abe, and Andrew) can arrive between Declan and Danielle. So, there are four (four factorial) ways for the remaining friends to arrive:

4! = 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 = 24 ways

To find the probability that Declan will arrive first and Danielle will arrive last, we need to divide the number of ways Declan can arrive first and Danielle last by the total number of ways they can all arrive:

Probability = (Number of ways Declan first and Danielle last) / (Total number of ways)
Probability = 24 / 720 = 1/30

So, the probability that Declan will arrive first and Danielle will arrive last is 1/30.

visit here to learn more about probability:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The sum of the finite power series is [tex]\frac{x^7-x^{11}}{1-x}[/tex]

Given is a finite series with 4 terms,

5x⁷ + 5x⁸ + 5x⁹ + 5x¹⁰

The sum of the finite power series is = qᵃ - qᵇ⁺¹ / 1-q

Here, q = x, a = 7, b = 10

So, the sum = x⁷ - x¹⁰⁺¹ / 1-x =  [tex]\frac{x^7-x^{11}}{1-x}[/tex]

Hence, the sum of the finite power series is [tex]\frac{x^7-x^{11}}{1-x}[/tex]

Learn more about finite power series click;

https://brainly.com/question/12685015

#SPJ4

False. In any vector space, the equation ax = ay does not necessarily imply that x = y.

In a vector space, scalar multiplication is defined such that multiplying a scalar (a constant) by a vector results in another vector. However, it is not always true that if two scalar multiples of vectors are equal, then the original vectors must be equal as well.

Consider the case where a = 0, which is a valid scalar in any vector space. If we multiply any vector x by 0, we get the zero vector, denoted as 0x = 0, regardless of the value of x. Similarly, multiplying any vector y by 0 gives us 0y = 0. In this case, even though 0x = 0y, it does not necessarily imply that x = y, since both x and y could be any vectors in the vector space.

Therefore, the statement "ax = ay implies that x = y" is false, as demonstrated by the example above where ax = ay but x ≠ y.

To learn more about vector space here:

brainly.com/question/13058822#

#SPJ11

To solve the system of equations 15 - 3x + y = -15 and 3 (which I assume is the value of the second equation), we can start by simplifying the first equation:

15 - 3x + y = -15
y - 3x = -30

Now we can substitute the value of 3 for the second equation into the simplified first equation:

y - 3x = -30
y - 9 = -30
y = -21

So we have solved for y, and now we can substitute this value back into either of the original equations to solve for x:

15 - 3x + y = -15
15 - 3x - 21 = -15
-3x = 21
x = -7

Therefore, the solution to the system is (x, y) = (-7, -21).

Since there is only one solution, we do not have infinitely many solutions, and we do not need to write a general form of the solution.

Learn more about equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/24169758

#SPJ11

The correct answer is option d. 928.02. This can be answered by the concept of sum of squares.

The sum of squares due to regression (SSR) is a statistical term that measures the total amount of variation in the dependent variable that can be explained by the regression model. It is also known as the explained sum of squares. SSR is an important component of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) used in regression analysis to assess the goodness of fit of the regression model.

In the given options, option d. 928.02 is the correct answer as it represents the sum of squares due to regression (SSR). Option a. 1434, option b. 505.98, and option c. 50.598 are not correct as they do not represent the sum of squares due to regression (SSR).

Therefore, the correct answer is d. 928.02.

To learn more about sum of squares here:

brainly.com/question/31484660#

#SPJ11

The correction factor for the adjacent side of a right triangle is the cosine of the given angle (θ)

To find the correction factor for the adjacent side of a right triangle, you need to use the concept of trigonometric ratios. In a right triangle, the correction factor for the adjacent side can be found using the cosine ratio.

Step 1: Identify the given angle (θ) and the hypotenuse length (H).
Step 2: Use the cosine ratio formula: Cos(θ) = Adjacent Side / Hypotenuse (H)
Step 3: Solve for the adjacent side: Adjacent Side = Cos(θ) * Hypotenuse (H)

The correction factor for the adjacent side of a right triangle is the cosine of the given angle (θ). By multiplying the cosine of the angle with the hypotenuse length, you can find the length of the adjacent side.

Learn more about Triangles: https://brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ11

As a result, the circle's radius is roughly 6.30 cm, and the cone's vertical angle is approximately 7.04 degrees.

The diameter is a straight line that runs through the circle's centre. The radius is half the diameter.It begins at a point on the circle and terminates at the circle's centre.

Let's start by calculating the diameter of the circle from which the sector was sliced. Because the sector's central angle is 320°, the remaining central angle is:

360° - 320° = 40°

That example, the sector is 40/360 = 1/9 of the entire circle. As a result, the diameter of the entire circle is:

C = (2π)r

where r denotes the circle's radius. Because the sector used to construct the cone is 7 cm long along its curved edge, its length is also equivalent to 1/9 of the circle's circumference:

7 = (1/9)(2π)r

By multiplying both sides by 9/2, we get:

r = (63/2π) cm

Let us now calculate the cone's slant height. The slant height is the distance between the cone's tip and the border of the circular base. Because the sector used to construct the cone subtends an angle of 320° at its centre, the circle's remaining central angle is:

360° - 320° = 40°

This indicates that the cone's base is a circular sector with a central angle of 40° and a radius of 7 cm. The length of this sector's curving edge is:

(40/360)(2π)(7) = (4/9)π cm

The cone's slant height is equal to this length, so:

l = (4/9)π cm

Finally, determine the cone's vertical angle. The vertical angle is the angle formed by the cone's base and tip. This angle may be calculated using the Pythagorean theorem:

tan(θ) = (l / r)

where is the cone's vertical angle. Substituting the values we discovered for l and r yields:

tan(θ) = [(4/9)π] / [(63/2π)]

When we simplify this expression, we get:

tan(θ) = 8/63

We may calculate the inverse tangent of both sides as follows:

θ = tan^-1(8/63)

Using a calculator, we discover:

θ ≈ 7.04°

As a result, the circle's radius is roughly 6.30 cm, and the cone's vertical angle is approximately 7.04 degrees.

To know more about diameter here-https://brainly.com/question/13015686

#SPJ1

We would expect to see approximately 4.2 defects in total if two containers are inspected.

If the number of visible defects on a product container follows a Poisson distribution with a mean of 2.1, then the probability of having x defects on a single container is given by:

P(X = x) = [tex]e^(-2.1) * (2.1)^x / x![/tex]

where e is the mathematical constant approximately equal to 2.71828.

To find the expected number of defects in two containers, we can use the linearity of expectation, which states that the expected value of a sum of random variables is equal to the sum of their expected values. Therefore, the expected number of defects in the two containers is:

E(X1 + X2) = E(X1) + E(X2)

Since the Poisson distribution is memoryless, the expected number of defects in one container is equal to the mean, which is 2.1. Therefore:

E(X1 + X2) = E(X1) + E(X2) = 2.1 + 2.1 = 4.2

So, we would expect to see approximately 4.2 defects in total if two containers are inspected.

Learn more about random variables

https://brainly.com/question/17238189

#SPJ4

Required correct statement is the sales of cars in April is misleading because the scale on the vertical axis begins at 244. This exaggerates the sales differences between the years. Someone might believe that the sales of cars increased dramatically between 2004 and 2006, but the difference is only 10 cars.

Here the graph is misleading because of the scales on both the horizontal and vertical axes. The starting point of 244 on both axes exaggerates the differences between the sales figures for each year. As a result, someone might believe that there was a dramatic increase or decrease in car sales between 2004 and 2006 when in reality, the difference was only a few cars. This shows the importance of using appropriate scales on graphs to accurately represent data.

Therefore,

The graph showing the sales of cars in April is misleading because the scale on the vertical axis begins at 244. This exaggerates the sales differences between the years. Someone might believe that the sales of cars increased dramatically between 2004 and 2006, but the difference is only 10 cars.

Learn more about the graph here,

https://brainly.com/question/28279103

#SPJ1

The probability that none of the given houses were burglarized is 22%, under the required condition that probability that a house in an urban area will be burglarized is 3%, and total number of houses is 30.

Let  us consider X to be the number of houses that were  burglarized.
Then probability of a house in attempts to being burglarized is p = 0.03.
And probability of a house not being burglarized is
q = 1 - p
= 0.97.
The total trials is n = 30.

Now the probability regarding none of the houses will be burglarized is

[tex]P(X = 0) = C(30,0) * (0.03)^0 * (0.97)^{30}[/tex]
= 0.2202

Hence, the probability  of none of the houses being  burglarized is 0.2202

Converting it into percentage

0.22 x 100
= 22%

To learn more about probability,
https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ4