Expressing the regression equation in terms of the x variable instead of the y variable will cause the y intercept and ____ to change.

The first four nonzero terms in the series expansion about x = 0 are:

y = -21/(100r² + 100r) x⁻¹ - 21/(100(r+1)(r+2)) x + ...

Now, First, we need to calculate the indicial roots of the given equation. We do this by substituting [tex]y = x^r[/tex] into the equation and solving for r as;

⇒ [tex]100 x^{r + 1} * 20 x^{r} + 21 = 0[/tex]

Simplifying and dividing by [tex]x^{2r + 1}[/tex], we get:

100r² + 100r + 21 = 0

Solving the quadratic equation, we find that the roots are;

r =  -0.21 and -1.

And, We take the larger root, -1, as our indicial root.

Next, we use the method of Fresenius to find the first four terms in the series expansion about x = 0.

We assume that the solution has the form:

y = [tex]x^{r}[/tex] (a₀ + a₁x + a₂x² + a₃x³ + ...)

Substituting this into the original equation and simplifying, we get:

a₀ = -21/(100r² + 100r)

a₁ = 0

a₂ = -21/(100(r+1)(r+2))

a₃ = 0

Therefore, the first four nonzero terms in the series expansion about x = 0 are:

y = -21/(100r² + 100r) x⁻¹ - 21/(100(r+1)(r+2)) x + ...

Learn more about the mathematical expression visit:

brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ4

the likelihood of the arbitrary(random) number generator producing a 6 is 1/10 or 0.1. 

A uniform distribution may be a likelihood distribution in which all conceivable results are similarly likely.

Within the case of an arbitrary number generator that creates numbers irregular numbers between and 9 comprehensive taking after a uniform distribution, each number has the same likelihood of being produced, which is 1/10 (or 0.1).

This implies that the likelihood of producing any particular number, such as 6, is additionally 1/10 (or 0.1).

The concept of a uniform distribution is imperative in insights and likelihood hypothesis since it permits us to demonstrate circumstances where we have no reason to accept that any specific result is more likely than any other result.

For illustration, in case we were rolling a reasonable six-sided pass on, we would anticipate each number to be similarly likely to come up.

In rundown, the uniform distribution could be a simple but imperative concept in the likelihood hypothesis, and it is regularly utilized to demonstrate circumstances where all results are similarly likely.

Within the case of an arbitrary number generator that creates numbers arbitrary numbers between and 9 comprehensive taking after a uniform distribution, each number has the same likelihood of being produced, which is 1/10 (or 0.1). 

To know more about uniform distribution refer to this :

https://brainly.com/question/22209943

#SPJ4

The asymptote of the following function f(x) = x/ (x-1)(x+2) is; A: At x = negative 2, limit of f (x) as x approaches negative 2 minus = negative infinity and limit of f (x) as x approaches negative 2 plus = infinity.

A vertical asymptote of a graph is a vertical line x = a where the graph tends toward positive or negative infinity as the inputs approach a.

For example is a value of x for which the denominator of the function is 0, and the function approaches infinity for these values of x.

We are given the function;

f(x) = x/ (x-1)(x+2)

Vertical asymptote:

Point in which the denominator is 0, so:

(x + 2) = 0

x = -2

Thus, we conclude that x = -2 is the vertical asymptote

Read more about Vertical Asymptote at;

brainly.com/question/4138300

#SPJ4

The standard form of the arithmetic sequence -18, -10, -2, 6, ... is: an = 8n - 26.

To write the arithmetic sequence -18, -10, -2, 6, ... in standard form, we first need to identify the common difference between the terms. To do this, we can subtract each term from the one that comes after it:

-10 - (-18) = 8
-2 - (-10) = 8
6 - (-2) = 8

Since each difference is 8, we know that this is an arithmetic sequence with a common difference of 8.

To write the sequence in standard form, we use the formula:

an = a1 + (n-1)d

where an is the nth term in the sequence, a1 is the first term, n is the term number, and d is the common difference.

In this case, a1 = -18 and d = 8.

So, to find the nth term, we use:

an = -18 + (n-1)8

Expanding the brackets gives:

an = -18 + 8n - 8

Simplifying:

an = 8n - 26

Know more about arithmetic sequence here:

https://brainly.com/question/15412619

#SPJ11

The derivative of the function f(x) = 1 / [2(3x + 4)²] with respect to x is df/dx = -6 / (3x + 4)³.

To find the derivative of the function f(x) = 1 / [2(3x + 4)²] with respect to x, we will follow these steps:

Step 1: Identify the function
f(x) = 1 / [2(3x + 4)²]

Step 2: Rewrite the function using a negative exponent
f(x) = (3x + 4)⁽⁻²⁾

Step 3: Apply the chain rule for the derivative

The chain rule states that the derivative of a composite function is the derivative of the outer function times the derivative of the inner function. In this case, our outer function is u⁽⁻²⁾, and our inner function is u = 3x + 4.

Step 4: Find the derivative of the outer function
Using the power rule, we get d(u⁽⁻²⁾)/du = -2u⁽⁻³⁾

Step 5: Find the derivative of the inner function
d(3x + 4)/dx = 3

Step 6: Apply the chain rule
Now, multiply the derivatives from Steps 4 and 5:
df/dx = (-2u⁽⁻³⁾)(3)
df/dx = -6(3x + 4)⁽⁻³⁾

Step 7: Rewrite the derivative with a positive exponent
df/dx = -6 / (3x + 4)³

So, the derivative of the function f(x) = 1 / [2(3x + 4)²] with respect to x is df/dx = -6 / (3x + 4)³.

To know more about Derivative refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ11

Yes, the distributor has a right to complain to the water bottling company because a 1-gallon bottle containing exactly 1-gallon of water lies outside the 95% confidence interval.

The 95% confidence interval is a statistical measure that provides a range of values within which a true population parameter is likely to fall with 95% confidence. If a 1-gallon bottle containing exactly 1-gallon of water lies outside this confidence interval, it means that the actual quantity of water in the bottle is either significantly higher or significantly lower than the expected amount. This indicates a potential issue with the accuracy or consistency of the water bottling process.

The fact that the measured quantity of water falls outside the 95% confidence interval suggests that there may be inconsistencies or errors in the water bottling process, resulting in variations in the amount of water being filled into the bottles. This can be a valid reason for the distributor to complain to the water bottling company, as it indicates a lack of quality control and adherence to standards in the production process.

Therefore, based on the results indicating that a 1-gallon bottle containing exactly 1-gallon of water lies outside the 95% confidence interval, the distributor has a right to complain to the water bottling company about the potential inconsistency in the quantity of water in the bottles.

To learn more about confidence interval here:

brainly.com/question/24131141#

#SPJ11

When the sample size is too small, it may be necessary to use alternative statistical tests or to collect a larger sample to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the results obtained.

The success-failure condition is a requirement for using certain statistical tests, such as the z-test and chi-square test. This condition requires that the sample size is large enough such that both the number of successes and the number of failures in the sample are at least 10.

The reason for this requirement is that statistical tests rely on the assumption of a normal distribution, which is not accurate when the sample size is too small. When the sample size is small, the distribution of the data may be skewed or have a high level of variability, which can lead to inaccurate or unreliable results.

When the success-failure condition is not met, it may be necessary to use alternative statistical tests or to collect a larger sample.

To know more about sample size here

https://brainly.com/question/30885988

#SPJ4

Answer:

First option

Third option

Step-by-step explanation:

First simplify the given expression:

6 - x + 2x - 7 + 2x

6 + x - 7 + 2x

-1 + 3x or 3x - 1

Then find the other expressions that are equivalent to that

In a 4x3x2x2 factorial experiment, you have 4 independent variables and potentially 4 main effect hypotheses.

The 4 independent variables are represented by the four numbers in the experimental design

(i.e., 4 levels of variable A, 3 levels of variable B, 2 levels of variable C, and 2 levels of variable D).

The potentially 4 main effect hypotheses are one for each independent variable, which states that there is a significant effect of that independent variable on the outcome variable.

A factorial experiment includes multiple factors simultaneously, each consisting of two or more

levels. Many factors simultaneously influence what is studied in a factorial experiment, and

experimenters consider the main effects and interactions between factors.

To know more about Factorial experiment:

https://brainly.com/question/18402941

#SPJ11

45+45+120+120=590 the answer in 590

For problem 19: The value of the integral is (5π/2).

For problem 22: The value of the integral is  [(e²)/2 - 1/2]

For problem 19, it is difficult to integrate in the given order of integration because the limits of integration for y depend on the value of x. To change the order of integration, we can integrate with respect to y first and then with respect to x. So the new iterated integral becomes:

∫ from 0 to 2π ∫ from 0 to ln(7/2) eˣ dy dx

Evaluating this integral, we get:

∫ from 0 to 2π (e^(ln(7/2)) - e⁰) dx

= ∫ from 0 to 2π (7/2 - 1) dx

= (7/2 - 1) * (2π - 0)

= 7π/2 - π

= (5π/2)

Therefore, the value of the iterated integral is (5π/2).

For problem 22, it is difficult to integrate in the given order of integration because the limits of integration for y depend on the value of x. To change the order of integration, we can integrate with respect to y first and then with respect to x. So the new iterated integral becomes:

∫ from 1 to e ∫ from ln y to 1 1 + ln y dy dx

Evaluating this integral, we get:

∫ from 1 to e (∫ from ln y to 1 1 + ln y dy) dx

= ∫ from 1 to e (y(ln y - 1) + y) dx

= ∫ from 1 to e (xy - x + x) dx

= ∫ from 1 to e (xy) dx

= [(e²)/2 - 1/2]

Therefore, the value of the iterated integral is [(e²)/2 - 1/2].

To know more about limits of integration click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31479284#

#SPJ11

If alpha is set lower than .05, significant findings can be reported with 95% confidence.

This means that if a statistical test produces a p-value which is less than .05, then in that case we can conclude that there is a significant difference between two groups or a significant relationship between two variables, with 95% confidence. This also means that there is a 5% chance that the significant result occurred by chance and is not actually a true effect.

It is important to note that statistical significance does not necessarily imply practical significance or importance, and that other factors should also be considered when interpreting research findings.

To learn more about p-value visit : https://brainly.com/question/13786078

#SPJ11

Based on the mentioned informations and provided values, the probability that the student answers at least 4 questions correctly is calculated to be 0.9511.

To solve this problem, we can use the binomial distribution. Let X be the number of questions the student answers correctly, then X is a binomial random variable with n = 19 and p = 1/3, since each question has 3 answer choices and the student is guessing randomly.

We want to find the probability that the student answers at least 4 questions correctly, which is the same as finding P(X >= 4). We can use the complement rule to calculate this probability:

P(X >= 4) = 1 - P(X < 4)

Now, we can use the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the binomial distribution to calculate P(X < 4):

P(X < 4) = Σ P(X = k), k = 0 to 3

where P(X = k) is the probability of getting exactly k questions correct. This probability can be calculated using the binomial probability mass function:

P(X = k) = (n choose k) x p[tex].^{k}[/tex] x (1 - p)[tex].^{n-k}[/tex]

where (n choose k) is the binomial coefficient, which represents the number of ways to choose k items from a set of n distinct items. In our case, (n choose k) = 19 choose k.

Using this formula, we can calculate P(X < 4) as follows:

P(X < 4) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) + P(X = 2) + P(X = 3)

= (19 choose 0) x (1/3)⁰ x (2/3)¹⁹

+ (19 choose 1) x (1/3)¹ x (2/3)¹⁸

+ (19 choose 2) x (1/3)² x (2/3)¹⁷

+ (19 choose 3) x (1/3)³ x (2/3)¹⁶

= 0.0489 (rounded to 4 decimal places)

Therefore, the probability that the student answers at least 4 questions correctly is:

P(X >= 4) = 1 - P(X < 4)

= 1 - 0.0489

= 0.9511 (rounded to 4 decimal places)

Learn more about Probability :

https://brainly.com/question/18882393

#SPJ4

Test is left tailed So critical region is   t < - 3.106.

What does the term "critical value" mean?

A criticial value is the test statistic's value that establishes a confidence interval's upper and lower boundaries or the level of statistical significance for a given test.

Z: To determine crucial value. Knowing whether a test is upper-tailed, lower-tailed, or two-tailed is necessary to determine critical value. For instance, the critical value is 1.645 if Za = 0.05 and an upper tailed test is used. It is -1.645 for a test with fewer tails.

Here we have given that  n = 12 and alpha = 0.005

We have to find critical region for left tailed t test,

So degress of freedom   = df = n- 1 = 12-1  =   11

So for df = 11 and left tailed test alpha = 0.005

Using t table, (Check attachement)

So critical value  = 3.106, Test is left tailed So critical region is   t < - 3.106

To know more about critical value check the below link:

https://brainly.com/question/14040224

#SPJ1

f(x) = 4x^2 -7

f(2) = 4*2^2 -7

= 16-7

=9

Using Bayes' Rule, we can find the probability of having the disease given a positive test: P(positive test) = P(positive test | D) * P(D) + P(positive test | not D) * P(not D)
P(D | positive test) = (0.99 * 0.01) / 0.0198 = 0.5

Using Bayes' theorem, we can calculate the probability of disease D given a positive test result, denoted as P(D|positive test). Bayes' theorem states:

P(D|positive test) = (P(positive test|D) * P(D)) / (P(positive test|D) * P(D) + P(positive test|not D) * P(not D))

Plugging in the given values:
P(D|positive test) = (0.99 * 0.01) / (0.99 * 0.01 + 0.01 * (1 - 0.01))

P(D|positive test) = (0.0099) / (0.0099 + 0.01 * 0.99)

P(D|positive test) = 0.0099 / (0.0099 + 0.0099)

P(D|positive test) = 0.0099 / 0.0198

P(D|positive test) = 0.5000

So, the probability of disease D given a positive test result is 0.5000.

Visit here to learn more about Probability:

brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The Addition Rule says that P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) when:

b. The events must be disjoint.

According to the Addition Rule, P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) is true when the events must be disjoint.
Disjoint events, also known as mutually exclusive events, are events that cannot occur simultaneously.

In other words, if one event occurs, the other event cannot occur at the same time.

Since there's no overlap between these events, we can simply add their individual probabilities to find the probability of either event A or event B occurring.

Option b. The events must be disjoint is correct.

For similar question on Addition.

https://brainly.com/question/29170774

#SPJ11

It is important to note that this statement is about the process of constructing intervals, not about any particular interval we might construct.

To construct a 95% two-sided confidence interval on the death rate from lung cancer, we need to know the sample proportion, sample size, and the level of confidence. Given the problem statement, we have:

Sample proportion (P) = 360/900 = 0.4

Sample size (n) = 900

Level of confidence = 95%

We can use the formula for the confidence interval for a population proportion as follows:

Confidence interval = P ± zα/2 * √(P(1-P)/n)

where P is the sample proportion, n is the sample size, zα/2 is the z-value from the standard normal distribution with a level of significance of α/2 (α/2 = 0.025 for a 95% confidence interval).

To find the z-value, we can use a z-table or a calculator. Using a calculator, we find the z-value for α/2 = 0.025 to be 1.96.

Substituting the values into the formula, we get:

Confidence interval = P ± zα/2 * √(P(1-P)/n)

Confidence interval = 0.4 ± 1.96 * √(0.4(1-0.4)/900)

Confidence interval = 0.4 ± 0.034

Therefore, the 95% two-sided confidence interval on the death rate from lung cancer is (0.366, 0.434).

This means that we are 95% confident that the true death rate from lung cancer falls within this interval. It is important to note that this statement is about the process of constructing intervals, not about any particular interval we might construct.

To learn more about sample proportion visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29912751

#SPJ11

The answer is 0. It is not DNE or [infinity] or -[infinity] because as x approaches infinity, the denominator (5x+5) grows much faster than the numerator (ln(3x+4)).

To evaluate the limit, you can apply L'Hôpital's Rule when the limit approaches the form 0/0 or ∞/∞ as x→∞. In this case, the limit is in the form ∞/∞, so you can apply L'Hôpital's Rule:

lim (x→∞) ln(3x + 4)/(5x + 5)

Taking the derivative of the numerator and denominator with respect to x:

d/dx(ln(3x + 4)) = (3)/(3x + 4)
d/dx(5x + 5) = 5

Now, the limit becomes:

lim (x→∞) (3)/(3x + 4) / 5

Simplify the expression by dividing by 5:

lim (x→∞) (3/5)/(3x + 4)

As x→∞, the denominator (3x + 4) becomes very large, and the entire fraction approaches 0. Therefore, the limit exists, and the answer is:

Limit = 0

Know more about limit here:

https://brainly.com/question/8533149

#SPJ11

The probability of a Type I error is equal to the significance level, which is given as a=0.05 so the probability of a Type I error is 0.05.

The probability of a Type I error is the probability of rejecting a null hypothesis when it is actually true. In other words, it is the probability of concluding that there is a significant effect or difference when in reality there is none.

This probability is denoted by alpha (α) and is usually set at a predetermined level, such as 0.05 or 0.01. In this question, the sample size is 120, and the probability of a Type II error (B) is given as 0.68. To find the probability of a Type I error, we need to subtract the probability of a Type II error from 1 and divide the result by 2. Therefore, the probability of a Type I error is (1 - 0.68) / 2 = 0.16.

Learn more about the probability at

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ4

The number of bins of bottles collected by Shelby = 38

Let us assume that x represents the bins of glass bottles collected by Pam and y represents the bins of glass bottles collected by Shelby.

Here, x = 7 1/2

We write this improper fration as proper fraction.

7 1/2 = 15/2

Shelby collected 5 1/8 times as many bins as Pam.

First we write 5 1/8 improper fration as proper fraction.

5 1/8 = 41/8

From above statement we get an expression,

y = ( 5 1/8) × x

y = (41/8) × x

y = 41/8 × 15/2

y = 38.43

y ≈ 38

Therefore, Shelby collected approximately 38 bins of bottles.

Learn more about an expression here:

https://brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ1

The length of the square is increasing at the rate of 1/10 m/s when 25 square meters is the area of the square .

What is the area of square?

Area of a square is side × side.

We know that A = x² where x is side of the square.

Taking the derivative of both sides with respect to time t,

dA/dt = 2x(dx/dt) where dx/dt is the rate of increasing of the length of the square.

It is given that dA/dt = 1 m/s when A = 25 m².

Putting these values into the above equation,

1 = 2x(dx/dt) When A = 25, x = √(25) = 5.

Putting this value into the equation above,

1 = 2(5)(dx/dt)

Simplifying this equation,

dx/dt = 1/10 m/s

Therefore, the length of the square is increasing at the rate of 1/10 m/s when 25 square meters is the area of the square .

Learn more about area of a square here,

https://brainly.com/question/25092270

#SPJ1

A. An example of a power series with a radius of convergence of 0 is Σ n=0 (n!)xⁿ. This series converges only at its center (x=0) but nowhere else.

B. The radius of convergence of the power series Σ n=0 (Cn + Dn) xⁿ is 2. The radii of convergence of the individual power series do not directly determine the radius of convergence of their sum.

C. No, it is not possible for the interval of convergence of a power series to be (0,∞). A power series converges within a specific interval, called the interval of convergence, which is always symmetric about its center. The interval of convergence will always have finite bounds, so it cannot be (0,∞).

To know more about power series click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29896893#

#SPJ11

The limit as x approaches infinity for f(x) is 1/4.

To find the limit of f(x) as x approaches infinity, we need to examine the behavior of the function as x becomes very large.

First, we can divide the numerator and denominator of f(x) by [tex]x^3[/tex] to simplify the expression:

f(x) = [tex](1 - 2/x + 3/x^2 + 4/x^3) / (4 - 3/x + 2/x^2 - 1/x^3)[/tex]

As x becomes very large, all of the terms with powers of x in the denominator become very small, so we can ignore them. This gives us:

f(x) ≈ (1 + 0 + 0 + 0) / (4 + 0 + 0 + 0) = 1/4

Therefore, as x approaches infinity, the limit of f(x) is 1/4.

Learn more about infinity

https://brainly.com/question/17714945

#SPJ4

A random variable has a normal distribution with a standard deviation (0) = 3.8. If the probability is 0.9713 that the random variable will take on a value less than 85.6, then 0.0352 is the probability that it will take on a value between 76 and 79.

To solve this problem, we need to use the properties of the normal distribution and standard deviation.
First, we can use a standard normal distribution table (also known as a z-table) to find the corresponding z-score for the probability of 0.9713. This z-score is approximately 2.07.
Next, we need to find the z-scores for the values 76 and 79. To do this, we use the formula z = (x - μ) / σ, where x is the value we're interested in, μ is the mean (which we don't know but can assume to be close to 85.6), and σ is the standard deviation of 3.8.
For x = 76, we have z = (76 - 85.6) / 3.8 = -2.53. For x = 79, we have z = (79 - 85.6) / 3.8 = -1.74.
Now, we can use the z-table again to find the probabilities associated with these z-scores. The probability of getting a z-score less than -2.53 is approximately 0.0057, and the probability of getting a z-score less than -1.74 is approximately 0.0409.
Finally, we can find the probability of the random variable taking on a value between 76 and 79 by subtracting the probability of getting a z-score less than -2.53 from the probability of getting a z-score less than -1.74. This gives us:
P(76 < X < 79) = P(Z < -1.74) - P(Z < -2.53)
≈ 0.0409 - 0.0057
≈ 0.0352
Therefore, the probability that the random variable will take on a value between 76 and 79 is approximately 0.0352.

To learn more about probability, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The decision on where to build the new plant(s) will depend on a variety of factors, including the anticipated increase in demand, the cost of building and operating each plant, and the potential for future growth in each location. Martin-Beck will need to carefully evaluate all of these factors before making a decision on where to invest its resources.

the Martin-Beck Company operates a plant in St. Louis with an annual capacity of 30,000 units.

Based on the information provided, the Martin-Beck Company operates a plant in St. Louis with an annual capacity of 30,000 units. They also ship their product to regional distribution centers in Boston, Atlanta, and Houston. In order to meet an anticipated increase in demand, Martin-Beck plans to increase capacity by constructing a new plant in one or more of the following cities: Detroit, Toledo, Denver, or Kansas City.

The estimated annual fixed cost and the annual capacity for the four proposed plants are as follows:

- Detroit: Annual fixed cost of $500,000 and an annual capacity of 15,000 units
- Toledo: Annual fixed cost of $600,000 and an annual capacity of 20,000 units
- Denver: Annual fixed cost of $700,000 and an annual capacity of 25,000 units
- Kansas City: Annual fixed cost of $800,000 and an annual capacity of 30,000 units

The decision on where to build the new plant(s) will depend on a variety of factors, including the anticipated increase in demand, the cost of building and operating each plant, and the potential for future growth in each location. Martin-Beck will need to carefully evaluate all of these factors before making a decision on where to invest its resources.

learn more about : Annual fixed cost

https://brainly.com/question/13993790

#SPJ11

(a) The area of the disk at a given y is A(y) = πR^2 = π(5sin(y))^2.
V = ∫[0, π] A(y) dy = ∫[0, π] π(5sin(y))^2 dy
V = π ∫[0, π] 25sin^2(y) dy
(b) Therefore, R(y) = 5 sin(y) - 4. and Substituting this into the formula for V, we get:
V = π ∫[0,π] (5 sin(y) - 4)^2 dy
V ≈ 4.1184 (rounded to four decimal places)

Let's first set up the integral for the volume of the solid obtained by rotating the region bounded by the curve x = 5sin(y), 0 ≤ y ≤ π, x = 0 about the axis y = 4.

(a) To find the volume V, we will use the disk method. We need to calculate the radius of the disk at each value of y in the given interval. The radius is the distance between the curve x = 5sin(y) and the axis of rotation y = 4. Since the curve is on the right side of the axis of rotation, we have:

Radius (R) = x = 5sin(y)

The area of the disk at a given y is A(y) = πR^2 = π(5sin(y))^2.

Now, we integrate the area function A(y) with respect to y over the interval [0, π] to find the volume V:

V = ∫[0, π] A(y) dy = ∫[0, π] π(5sin(y))^2 dy

V = π ∫[0, π] 25sin^2(y) dy

(b) To evaluate the integral to four decimal places, you can use a calculator with an integration function. Enter the integral:

π ∫[0, π] 25sin^2(y) dy

Your calculator should return a value for V, which is the volume of the solid. Remember to round the result to four decimal places.

Learn more about the Area:

brainly.com/question/27683633

#SPJ11

Answer:

The answer is 35

Step-by-step explanation:

Its correct, the answer is given to you.

The equation of the oblique asymptote of the average cost function C(x) is calculated to be y = 0.02x + 95.

The average cost function is given by:

AC(x) = C(x)/x

Substituting C(x) = 14,000 + 95x + 0.02x^2, we get:

AC(x) = (14,000 + 95x + 0.02x^2)/x

Dividing the numerator by x, we get:

AC(x) = 14,000/x + 95 + 0.02x

As x approaches infinity, the 14,000/x term becomes negligible compared to the other terms, so the oblique asymptote of AC(x) is y = 0.02x + 95.

Therefore, the equation of the oblique asymptote of the average cost function C(x) is y = 0.02x + 95.

To learn more about the average cost function; click here:

https://brainly.com/question/24661197

#SPJ11