Factor the binomial
12q^2 + 15q

The mean brightness of a random sample of 16 light bulbs from a population of 100-watt light bulbs will have a normal distribution. This is because, according to the Central Limit Theorem, the distribution of sample means from a large sample size (n ≥ 30) drawn from a population with any distribution shape will approximate a normal distribution, regardless of the shape of the original population distribution.

1. The Central Limit Theorem states that the sampling distribution of the mean of a random sample drawn from any population with a finite mean (μ) and a finite standard deviation (σ) will be approximately normally distributed, as long as the sample size is sufficiently large (n ≥ 30). In this case, we have a sample size of 16 light bulbs, which may not be large enough to satisfy the Central Limit Theorem, but since the population is assumed to be normally distributed with known mean (μ = 1650 lumens) and standard deviation (σ = 65 lumens), we can still approximate the sampling distribution of the mean as normal.

2. The mean (μx) of the sampling distribution of the mean brightness of these 16 light bulbs will be the same as the mean of the population (μ = 1650 lumens), since the sample mean is an unbiased estimator of the population mean. The standard deviation (σx) of the sampling distribution of the mean can be calculated using the formula σx = σ / √n, where σ is the population standard deviation and n is the sample size. Plugging in the given values, we get σx = 65 lumens / √16 = 65 lumens / 4 = 16.25 lumens.

3. To find the probability that the mean brightness of the 16 light bulbs is between 1620 lumens and 1640 lumens, we need to calculate the z-scores for these values using the formula z = (x - μx) / σx, where x is the value we are interested in, μx is the mean of the sampling distribution of the mean, and σx is the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. Plugging in the given values, we get z1 = (1620 - 1650) / 16.25 ≈ -1.85 and z2 = (1640 - 1650) / 16.25 ≈ -0.61. Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can find the probabilities associated with these z-scores. Let's denote the probability that the mean brightness is between 1620 lumens and 1640 lumens as P(-1.85 < z < -0.61).

The 70th percentile of a normal distribution corresponds to the z-score that separates the lowest 70% of the distribution from the highest 30%. Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we can find the z-score that corresponds to the 70th percentile, denoted as zp70. Then we can use the formula x = μx + zp70 × σx to find the 70th percentile for the mean brightness of 16 light bulbs.

Therefore, The mean brightness of a random sample of 16 light bulbs from a population of 100-watt light bulbs will have a normal distribution due to the Central Limit Theorem, as long as the population is assumed to be normally distributed. The mean of the sampling distribution of the mean will be the same as the mean of the population, which is 1650 lumens.

To learn more about Central Limit Theorem here:

brainly.com/question/18403552#

#SPJ11

The probability that there are exactly two power failures on a particular day is roughly 0.0459 or 0.046 (adjusted to three decimal places).

Let X be the number of control disappointments on a specific day. Since the mean number of control disappointments per day is 0.210, the Poisson parameter lambda additionally rises to 0.210.

Hence, we need to discover the likelihood that X = 2, given lambda = 0.210.

Utilizing the Poisson likelihood mass work, we have:

P(X = 2) = [tex](e^(-lambda) * lambda^x) / x![/tex]

P(X = 2) = ([tex]e^[/tex](-0.210) * 0.210²) / 2!

P(X = 2) = 0.04586

Hence, the likelihood that there are precisely two control disappointments in a specific day is roughly 0.0459 or 0.046 adjusted to three decimal places. 

To know more about probability refer to this :

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ4

The minimum value of y is -1. This can be answered by the concept from equation of a circle.

To find the minimum value of y, we need to rewrite the given equation in terms of y. Completing the square, we have:

x² - 14x + y² - 48y = 0
(x² - 14x + 49) + (y² - 48y + 576) = 49 + 576
(x - 7)² + (y - 24)² = 625

This is the equation of a circle with center (7,24) and radius 25. The minimum value of y occurs at the bottom of the circle, which is the point (7,24-25).

Therefore, the minimum value of y is -1.

To learn more about equation of a circle here:

brainly.com/question/29288238#

#SPJ11

Ken can change the oil in his car 8 times using 8 gallons of motor oil for the racing season and 2 gallons left from last season, given that he uses 5 quarts of oil for each change.

We can start by converting the 8 gallons of motor oil to quarts, since we're given that Ken uses 5 quarts of oil each time he changes the oil.

1 gallon is equal to 4 quarts, so

8 gallons x 4 quarts/gallon = 32 quarts

Ken also has 2 gallons left from last season, which is equal to

2 gallons x 4 quarts/gallon = 8 quarts

So, Ken has a total of 32 + 8 = 40 quarts of motor oil.

To find out how many times Ken can change the oil, we need to divide the total amount of motor oil by the amount of oil used for each change

40 quarts ÷ 5 quarts/change = 8 changes

Therefore, Ken can change the oil in his car 8 times.

To know more about amount of oil used:

https://brainly.com/question/15298299

#SPJ4

It will cost $70.56 to pour a concrete slab for a patio with the given dimensions.

To calculate the cost of the concrete slab, first, we need to find the volume of the slab in cubic yards. The dimensions given are in feet and inches:

Length = 11 feet
Width = 11 feet
Height = 3 inches (converted to feet: 3/12 = 0.25 feet)

Volume = Length × Width × Height
Volume = 11 × 11 × 0.25 = 30.25 cubic feet

Now, we need to convert cubic feet to cubic yards (1 cubic yard = 27 cubic feet):

Volume = 30.25 cubic feet × (1 cubic yard / 27 cubic feet) = 1.12 cubic yards

Finally, multiply the volume by the cost per cubic yard to find the total cost:

Cost = Volume × Cost per cubic yard
Cost = 1.12 cubic yards × $63.00 per cubic yard = $70.56

So, it will cost $70.56 to pour a concrete slab for a patio with the given dimensions.

To learn more about dimensions here:

brainly.com/question/29767744#

#SPJ11

The antiderivative of f(x) = 9x²-6x+6 is F(x) = 3x³ - 3x² + 6x + C

To find the antiderivative of [tex]f(x) = 9x²-6x+6[/tex], we need to use the power rule of integration, which states that the antiderivative of x^n is [tex](x^(n+1))/(n+1)[/tex], where n is any real number except -1. Applying the power rule to each term of f(x), we get:

∫9x² dx - ∫6x dx + ∫6 dx

Using the power rule, we can integrate each term as follows:

= 9∫x² dx - 6∫x dx + 6∫1 dx

= [tex]9(x^(2+1))/(2+1) - 6(x^(1+1))/(1+1) + 6(x^(0+1))/(0+1) + C[/tex]

= 3x³ - 3x² + 6x + C

where C is the constant of integration.

Therefore, the antiderivative of f(x) = 9x²-6x+6 is F(x) = 3x³ - 3x² + 6x + C.

Learn more about integrate

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ4

The probability of both marbles being white is about 0.067, and the probability of exactly one marble being white is about 0.467.

The probability that both marbles are white can be found by multiplying the probability of drawing a white marble on the first pick (3/10) by the probability of drawing a white marble on the second pick given that the first marble drawn was white (2/9).

So, P(both marbles are white) = (3/10) * (2/9) = 1/15 or 0.067.

The probability that exactly one marble is white can be found by adding the probability of drawing a white marble on the first pick (3/10) and drawing a black marble on the second pick given that the first marble drawn was white (7/9 * 3/10) to the probability of drawing a black marble on the first pick (7/10) and drawing a white marble on the second pick given that the first marble drawn was black (3/9 * 7/10).

So, P(exactly one marble is white) = (3/10 * 7/9) + (7/10 * 3/9) = 21/90 + 21/90 = 42/90 or 0.467.

The probability that both marbles are white can be calculated as follows:
(3/10) * (2/9) = 1/15 or approximately 0.067 (since there are 3 white marbles out of 10 and then 2 out of the remaining 9).

The probability that exactly one marble is white can be calculated using two scenarios:
1) First marble is white, second is black: (3/10) * (7/9)
2) First marble is black, second is white: (7/10) * (3/9)

Adding these probabilities gives:
(3/10)*(7/9) + (7/10)*(3/9) = 21/45 or approximately 0.467 (rounded to three decimal places).

So, the probability of both marbles being white is about 0.067, and the probability of exactly one marble being white is about 0.467.

To learn more about probability, click here:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The signed numbers are ;

(a) +8000 (assuming the population increased)

(b) -650 (since the elevation is below sea level)

Signed numbers are numbers that can represent both positive and negative values. They are usually denoted by a positive or negative sign placed in front of the number.

In mathematics, signed numbers are used to represent values that can be positive or negative, such as temperatures above or below freezing, gains or losses in finance, or elevations above or below sea level. In these cases, positive numbers represent values that are above a certain reference point, while negative numbers represent values that are below that point.

For example, if a reference point is set at sea level, elevations above sea level are represented by positive numbers, while elevations below sea level are represented by negative numbers. Similarly, if the reference point is set at zero in finance, gains are represented by positive numbers, while losses are represented by negative numbers.

The signed numbers are ;

(a) +8000 (assuming the population increased)

(b) -650 (since the elevation is below sea level)

Learn more about signed numbers below.

https://brainly.com/question/16859468

#SPJ1

Consequently, the rectangle's area is10x⁴y⁴z⁴. 

The size of a surface is referred to as its area. Square units like square meters  (m²), square centimeters(cm²), square inches

Define the area.

The size of a surface is referred to as its area. Square units like square meters  (m²), square centimeters(cm²), square inches (in2), etc. are used to measure it.

The following formula determines the area of a rectangle:

Area is equal to length times breadth.

In this instance, the rectangle is  2x³yz in length and 5xy³z³. in width. Therefore, we may add these values to the formula as follows:

Area equals (2x³yz) x (5xy³z³)

If we condense this expression, we get:

Size (10x⁴y⁴z⁴).

Consequently, the rectangle's area is 10x⁴y⁴z⁴.

To know more about area visit:

brainly.com/question/27683633

#SPJ1

The ANOVA test, indicating that at least one group is significantly different from another.

Number and name factors: One factor: Noise level

Dependent variable: Number of errors on the exam survey

5 Steps for hypothesis testing:

Step 1: State the null and alternative hypotheses

Null hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the number of errors for the different noise level groups.

Alternative hypothesis: There is a significant difference in the number of errors for the different noise level groups.

Step 2: Determine the level of significance

α = 0.05

Step 3: Calculate the F statistic

We first calculate the total sum of squares (SST), the sum of squares between groups (SSB), and the sum of squares within groups (SSW):

SST = ΣΣ(xij - X..)²

= (9-8.39)² + (7-8.39)² + ... + (12-9.5)² + (12-9.5)²

= 63.78

SSB = [(ΣXj²)/n] - [(ΣXj)²/N]

= [(81+79+80)/18] - [(240/18)²]

= 3.11

SSW = SST - SSB

= 63.78 - 3.11

= 60.67

Degrees of freedom between groups (dfB) = k - 1 = 3 - 1 = 2

Degrees of freedom within groups (dfW) = N - k = 18 - 3 = 15

Mean square between groups (MSB) = SSB/dfB = 3.11/2 = 1.55

Mean square within groups (MSW) = SSW/dfW = 60.67/15 = 4.05

F statistic = MSB/MSW = 1.55/4.05 = 0.38

Step 4: Determine the critical value

Using a significance level of α = 0.05 and degrees of freedom dfB = 2 and dfW = 15, we find the critical value from an F distribution table to be 3.68.

Step 5: Make a decision and interpret the results

Since the calculated F statistic (0.38) is less than the critical value (3.68), we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, we conclude that there is no significant difference in the number of errors for the different noise level groups.

ANOVA table:

Source | Df | SS | MS | F

Between | 2 | 3.11 | 1.55 | 0.38

Within | 15 | 60.67| 4.05 |

Total | 17 | 63.78| |

Effect size (eta squared):

η² = SSB/SST = 3.11/63.78 = 0.049

We would use the Tukey's HSD post hoc test to determine if any of the comparisons are significant because it is used when we reject the null hypothesis in the ANOVA test, indicating that at least one group is significantly different from another.

To learn more about hypothesis visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29519577

#SPJ11

When checking conditions for calculating a confidence interval for a proportion, you should use the observed number of successes and failures. (option c).

In general, if the sample size is large enough (typically, at least 30), then the observed number of successes and failures can be used to calculate a confidence interval for the proportion. This is because, in large samples, the observed sample proportion is likely to be close to the true population proportion.

However, if the sample size is small (less than 30), or if the observed number of successes or failures is very small, then the expected number of successes and failures may be used instead.

This is because, in small samples, the observed sample proportion may not be a reliable estimate of the true population proportion, and the standard error of the sample proportion may not be accurately estimated using the observed number of successes and failures.

Hence the correct option is (c).

To know more about confidence interval here

https://brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ4

The cumulative incidence of lung cancer is equal to

Your answer: b. 0.09

In this study, 5 people were followed for the occurrence of lung cancer. 1 person developed lung cancer after 7 years. To calculate the cumulative incidence, we divide the number of people who developed the outcome (lung cancer) by the total number of people who were at risk.

Since 2 people were lost to follow-up and 1 person died from a different cause, only 3 people were at risk for the entire study period (1 person who had lung cancer, 1 person who remained healthy for 10 years, and 1 person who died after 8 years from a different cause).

Cumulative incidence = (Number of people who developed lung cancer) / (Total number of people at risk)
Cumulative incidence = 1/3 = 0.3333

However, we need to consider the person who was lost to follow-up after 2 years and the one who was lost after 5 years. Assuming the worst-case scenario, we consider these individuals were at risk for the entire study period as well. This would make the total number of people at risk 5.

Cumulative incidence = 1/5 = 0.20

Considering the given options, the closest answer is b. 0.09.

learn more about cumulative incidence,

https://brainly.com/question/31493651

#SPJ11

[tex]\textit{midsegment of a trapezoid}\\\\ m=\cfrac{a+b}{2} ~~ \begin{cases} a,b=\stackrel{parallel~sides}{bases~\hfill }\\[-0.5em] \hrulefill\\ a=19.5\\ b=27 \end{cases}\implies m=\cfrac{19.5+27}{2}\implies m=23.25[/tex]

The equation of the tangent line to the curve y = 6x In(3x) at x = 1/3 is y = 6x - 1/2In(1/3) - 2.

To find the equation of the tangent line to the curve at a given point, we need to find the slope of the tangent line at that point. In this case, we need to find the slope of the curve y = 6x In(3x) at x = 1/3.

To do this, we can use the derivative of the function y = 6x In(3x), which is given by:

y' = 6(1 + In(3x))

At x = 1/3, the slope of the tangent line is given by:

y' = 6(1 + In(1)) = 6

So the slope of the tangent line at x = 1/3 is 6. Now we can use the point-slope form of the equation of a line to find the equation of the tangent line:

y - y₁ = m(x - x₁)

where m is the slope of the tangent line, and (x₁, y₁) is the point on the curve where we want to find the tangent line.

Substituting the values we have, we get:

y - (1/2)In(1/3) = 6(x - 1/3)

Simplifying this equation, we get:

y = 6x - 1/2In(1/3) - 2

To learn more about equation click on,

https://brainly.com/question/30968285

#SPJ4

Independent variables is physical attraction and dependent is romantic attraction. Extraneous is gender, operational is self-report survey, hypothesis is personality trait, design for gathering data, validity for equal distribution and procedure through social media.

Research question: What factors influence romantic attraction between individuals?

Independent variables: Physical attraction, personality traits, interests/hobbies, communication skills, and presence of common values

Dependent variable: The level of romantic attraction between the individuals

Potential extraneous variables: Gender, age, sexual orientation, relationship status, and cultural background. These variables will be controlled by ensuring an equal distribution of participants based on these characteristics.

Operational definitions: Physical attraction will be measured using a rating scale from 1 to 10, personality traits will be assessed using a personality questionnaire, interests/hobbies will be identified through a self-report survey, communication skills will be evaluated through a mock conversation between participants, and common values will be assessed through a values assessment tool.

Hypothesis: We hypothesize that physical attraction, personality traits, interests/hobbies, communication skills, and the presence of common values will all play a significant role in determining the level of romantic attraction between individuals.

Design: Our design will be cross-sectional, as we will be collecting data at one point in time. This design will allow us to quickly gather data on a large number of participants and identify factors that influence romantic attraction.

Internal validity: To ensure internal validity, we will randomly assign participants to groups and use standardized measures to assess key variables. We will also control for extraneous variables by ensuring equal distribution of participants based on relevant characteristics.

External validity: To address external validity, we will recruit a diverse sample of participants from different backgrounds and locations to ensure the results can be generalized to a broader population.

Procedures: Participants will be recruited through social media and other online platforms. They will be asked to complete a series of questionnaires and participate in a mock conversation with another participant. We will analyze the data using statistical methods to identify significant factors associated with romantic attraction.

Learn more about variables here:

https://brainly.com/question/30848625

#SPJ11

Answer:

k = -1.

Step-by-step explanation:

√4k-11+15=2

√4k = 11-15+2

√4k = -2

Squaring both sides

4k^2 = 4

k^2 = 1

k = +/- 1

Only k = -1 fits the original eqation

For an experiment of 80 times rolling a die with twos that come up is tallied, the standard deviation for the random variable X, the number of two's is equals to the 3.36.

We have, a die is rolled 80 times. Let X be a random variable for the number of two's that come up is tallied. Assume, this experiment is repeated many times. We have to determine the standard deviations for X. Here, number of trials, n = 80

Probability of success, p = 1/6 = 0.17

Probability of failure, q = 1 - p = 0.83

then the formula for mean and standard deviations are the following, mean = n×p

and standard deviations, std =

[tex]\sqrt{npq}[/tex]

[tex]= \sqrt{ 80×0.83 × 0.17}[/tex]

[tex]= \sqrt{ 11.288}[/tex]

= 3.36

Hence, required value is equals to 3.36.

For more information about standard deviations, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30612641

#SPJ4

The value of given functions f₁ (t), f₂ (t), f₃ (t) and f₄ (t) are linearly independent.

Given that;

All the functions are,

f₁ (t) = 2t - 3

f₂ (t) = t² + 1

f₃ (t) = 2t² - t

f₄ (t) = t² + t + 1

Now, We can setting up a matrix with the coefficients of each function as the rows:

2 0 0 0

-3 1 0 1

0 2 -1 1

0 1 1 1

And, Now let's do some row operations to put the matrix in row echelon form:

2 0 0 0

0 1 0 1

0 0 -1 0

0 0 0 1

Hence, We have a pivot in every column, so the functions are linearly independent.

And, There is no non-trivial linear combination of them that equals the zero function.

Therefore, we can conclude that f1(t), f2(t), f3(t) and f4(t) are linearly independent.

Learn more about the function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ1

A half life is the amount of time it takes for half of a radioactive substance to decay.

Yes, that is correct. The half-life of a radioactive element is the amount of time it takes for half of the initial amount of the element to decay. Therefore, the larger the initial amount of the element, the longer the half-life will be. This is because there are more atoms that need to decay in order for the half-life to occur. Conversely, if the initial amount of the element is small, the half-life will be shorter because there are fewer atoms that need to decay.

learn more about "half-life":- https://brainly.com/question/1160651

#SPJ11

When the radius of the crowd is 2 ft, the area taken up by the crowd is increasing at a rate of 12π ft²/sec.

To find out how fast the area taken up by the crowd is increasing when the radius is 2 ft, we'll need to use these terms: radius, rate, and area.
The radius of the crowd (r) is increasing at a rate of 3 ft/sec (dr/dt = 3 ft/sec)
We need to find the rate of change of the area (dA/dt) when the radius is 2 ft.
Write the formula for the area of a circle.
Area (A) = π ×[tex]r^2[/tex]
Differentiate the area formula with respect to time (t).
dA/dt = d(π × [tex]r^2[/tex]) / dt
Apply the chain rule.
dA/dt = π × (2 × r) × (dr/dt)
Plug in the given values (r = 2 ft, dr/dt = 3 ft/sec).
dA/dt = π × (2 × 2 ft) × (3 ft/sec)
Calculate dA/dt.
dA/dt = 12π ft²/sec.

For similar question on radius.

https://brainly.com/question/29170128

#SPJ11

In order for there to be 10 visits, she needs to make 10.

What is system of linear equations?

The intersections or meetings of the lines or planes that represent the linear equations are known as the solutions of linear equations. The set of values for the variables in every feasible solution is known as a solution set for a system of linear equations.

points that piper earned 13.5x + 60

she cannot get free tickets until she has at least 195 points.

so   13.5x + 60 ≥ 195

13.5x ≥ 195 - 60

13.5x ≥ 135 x ≥ 10

So, In order for there to be 10 visits, she needs to make 10.

Learn more about the system of linear equations, by the following link.

https://brainly.com/question/25858757

#SPJ1

On solving the provided query we have As a result, Jerry will be required  expressions to pay the following sum for the month of June: $6150 (monthly premium plus $6,000 for the accident's cost)

It is possible to multiply, divide, add, or subtract in mathematics. The following is how an expression is put together: Number, expression, and mathematical operator The components of a mathematical expression (such as addition, subtraction, multiplication or division, etc.) include numbers, variables, and functions. It is possible to contrast expressions and phrases. An expression, often known as an algebraic expression, is any mathematical statement that contains variables, numbers, and an arithmetic operation between them. For instance, the word m in the given equation is separated from the terms 4m and 5 by the arithmetic symbol +, as does the variable m in the expression 4m + 5.

a) Jerry will be responsible for paying his $1500 deductible out of pocket. Up to the $10,000 coverage limit, the insurance policy will then pay for the remaining expenses.

Jerry will thus be responsible for paying the following sum towards the accident's bill:

Deductible of $1500 plus the amount above the deductible that is still within the $10,000 coverage limit equals $6000.

So Jerry will be responsible for paying the accident's bill of $6000.

b) In addition to the bill from the accident, Jerry will also be responsible for paying his usual $150 monthly payment.

As a result, Jerry will be required to pay the following sum for the month of June:

$6150 (monthly premium plus $6,000 for the accident's cost)

To know more about expressions visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ1

Answer: pretty sure its c

Step-by-step explanation: i might be wrong

The tangent line approximation near x = 0 gives [tex]e^{2.1}[/tex] ≈ -1.1.

However, this result is not correct since[tex]e^{-2.1}[/tex] is a positive number and the tangent line approximation gives a negative number.

Therefore, there must be an error in the calculations.

To find the tangent line approximation for 5 + x near x = 2, we need to find the derivative of the function 5 + x and evaluate it at x = 2:

f(x) = 5 + x

f'(x) = 1

So the slope of the tangent line at x = 2 is f'(2) = 1.

We also need a point on the tangent line to determine the equation of the line.

Since the point of tangency is (2, 7), we can use this point.

Using point-slope form of a line, we have:

y - 7 = 1(x - 2)

Simplifying this expression, we get:

y = x + 5

Therefore, the tangent line approximation for 5 + x near x = 2 is y = x + 5.

To find the value of [tex]e^{-2.1}[/tex], we use the tangent line approximation near x = 0.

Since the tangent line approximation near x = 0 is y = x + 5, we have:

[tex]f(x) = e^x[/tex]

[tex]f'(x) = e^x[/tex]

So the slope of the tangent line at x = 0 is f'(0) = 1.

Using point-slope form of a line, we have:

[tex]y - (e^0) = 1(x - 0)[/tex]

Simplifying this expression, we get:

y = x + 1

Therefore, the tangent line approximation for [tex]e^x[/tex] near x = 0 is y = x + 1.

To find the value of [tex]e^{-2.1}[/tex] using this tangent line approximation, we plug in x = -2.1:

y = (-2.1) + 1 = -1.1.

For similar question on tangent.

https://brainly.com/question/30052756

#SPJ11

The completed terms are (3 x 10¹)+(2 × 10¹⁹) + (2 × 10¹⁹) = 3 x 10¹ + 4 x 10¹⁹ = 4 x 10¹⁹, as the 10¹⁹ terms add up to 7 x 10²⁰.

To complete the terms you have to first performing the multiplication within each set of parentheses, which gave me (3 x 10¹⁹) + (4 x 10¹⁹). Then, I added these two terms together to get a final answer of 7 x 10²⁰.

In mathematics, a term is defined as the values of an algebraic expression on which mathematical operations occur. Let's look at an example of a word. This algebraic statement has terms 8x and 9.

Learn more about terms:
https://brainly.com/question/19774850
#SPJ4

The vertices of polygon A′B′C′D′ are A′(−3, 4.5), B′(−1.5, 1.5), C′(3, −1.5), D′(3, 3).

Scale factor is a numerical value used to measure the difference between two objects, such as two shapes or two measurements. It is used to determine the amount of enlargement or reduction that needs to be done in order to make one object match the other. It is often used in mathematics and engineering to compare different measurements or objects. Scale factor can also be used to describe the relative size of an object compared to another object.

The vertices of polygon A′B′C′D′ after dilating polygon ABCD using a scale factor of three fourths are A′(−3, 4.5), B′(−1.5, 1.5), C′(3, −1.5), D′(3, 3). This can be found by multiplying each vertex of ABCD by the scale factor of three fourths. For example, for vertex A, (−4, 6) is multiplied by three fourths, resulting in (−3, 4.5). Therefore, the vertices of polygon A′B′C′D′ are A′(−3, 4.5), B′(−1.5, 1.5), C′(3, −1.5), D′(3, 3).

To know more about scale factor click-
https://brainly.com/question/2826496
#SPJ1

Mika was glad that he had not chosen a larger sample size because a sample greater than n=30 would have caused the confidence interval to become wider and less precise.

Mika concluded that it was okay to use the sample proportion p=0.3667 to construct a confidence interval. In this case, Mika is correct because the sample size n=30 is large enough to satisfy the conditions for constructing a confidence interval for a population proportion.

Mika also concluded that the proportion of households in the whole state that would claim to own a dog or cat would be in the range of 36.67% +/- 5%, which is equivalent to 31.67% to 41.67%. This is also a correct interpretation of the confidence interval. The range of values provides an estimate of the likely range of values for the true proportion of households in the state that own a dog or cat.

This is also correct because as the sample size increases, the margin of error decreases, and the confidence interval becomes narrower.

However, once the sample size is large enough, increasing the sample size further does not significantly improve the precision of the confidence interval.

To know more about confidence interval here

https://brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ4

The population proportions are different from the hypothesized values.

To test the hypotheses, we can use the chi-square goodness-of-fit test.

The null hypothesis (H0) is that the population proportions are pA = 0.40, pB = 0.40, and pC = 0.20. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that the population proportions are not pA = 0.40, pB = 0.40, and pC = 0.20.

We can calculate the expected frequencies for each category under the null hypothesis as follows:

Expected frequency for category A = 0.40 x 200 = 80

Expected frequency for category B = 0.40 x 200 = 80

Expected frequency for category C = 0.20 x 200 = 40

We can then calculate the chi-square statistic as:

χ2 = ∑(O-E)2 / E

where O is the observed frequency and E is the expected frequency.

Using the values from the sample, we get:

χ2 = [(160-80)2/80] + [(20-80)2/80] + [(20-40)2/40]

= 120 + 900 + 100

= 1120

The degrees of freedom for this test is df = k - 1 = 3 - 1 = 2, where k is the number of categories.

Using a chi-square distribution table with df = 2 and a significance level of α = 0.01, we find the critical value to be 9.210.

Since the calculated chi-square statistic (1120) is greater than the critical value (9.210), we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the population proportions are not pA = 0.40, pB = 0.40, and pC = 0.20.

Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the population proportions are different from the hypothesized values.

learn more about the 2 goodness of fit test (hypothesized) here,

https://brainly.com/question/16910222

#SPJ11

the probability that 5 or fewer games finish in less than 15 minutes is 0.167.

Using the binomial distribution, we have:

n = 20 (number of games)

p = 0.45 (probability of finishing under 15 min)

q = 1 - p = 0.55 (probability of finishing over 15 min)

We want to find P(X ≤ 5), where X is the number of games that finish in under 15 min. Using the cumulative binomial distribution table, we find:

P(X ≤ 5) = 0.167

Therefore, the probability that 5 or fewer games finish in less than 15 minutes is 0.167.

Using the binomial distribution, we have:

n = 5 (number of days)

p = 0.7 (probability of arriving on time)

q = 1 - p = 0.3 (probability of arriving late)

We want to find P(X < 4), where X is the number of days the train arrives on time. Using the cumulative binomial distribution table, we find:

P(X < 4) = 0.744

Therefore, the probability that the train arrives on time fewer than 4 times in the next 5 days is 0.744.

Using the binomial distribution, we have:

n = 10 (number of coin tosses)

p = 0.5 (probability of getting heads)

q = 1 - p = 0.5 (probability of getting tails)

We want to find P(X > 7), where X is the number of times we get heads. Using the cumulative binomial distribution table, we find:

P(X > 7) = 0.171

Therefore, the probability of getting more than 7 heads from 10 tosses is 0.171

learn about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The additional time it took Luke to get to school than Sarah is 13 minutes

From the question, we are to calculate how much longer it took Luke to get to school than Sarah

From the given information,

'Luke left his house at 7:12 am and arrived at school today at 8:00am'

The time it took Luke to get to school is 8:00 am - 7:12 am = 48 minutes

Also,

"Sarah left her house 7:05 a and arrived at school at 7:40 am"

The time it took Sarah to get to school is 7:40 am - 7:05 am = 35 minutes

To determine how much longer it took Luke to get to school than Sarah, we will subtract the time it took Sarah to get to school from the time it took Luke to get to school

That is,

48 minutes - 35 minutes

= 13 minutes

Hence,

It took Luke 13 minutes longer

Learn more on Calculating time here: https://brainly.com/question/24571540

#SPJ1