Find the antiderivative: f(x) = 8x⁹ - 3x⁶ + 12x³

We cannot conclude that the true standard deviation is greater than the value reported by the National Institutes of Health.

To answer this question, we need to conduct a hypothesis test. The null hypothesis is that the true standard deviation of the half-life of oxycodone is equal to 1.43 hours (σ = 1.43). The alternative hypothesis is that the true standard deviation is greater than 1.43 hours (σ > 1.43). We will use a one-tailed test with a significance level of 0.05.

To perform the test, we need to calculate the test statistic, which is given by:

t = (s / sqrt(n-1)) / (σ0 / sqrt(n))

where s is the sample standard deviation (1.5 hours), n is the sample size (25), and σ0 is the hypothesized value of the standard deviation (1.43 hours).

Plugging in the values, we get:

t = (1.5 / sqrt(24)) / (1.43 / sqrt(25)) = 1.49

Using a t-distribution table with 24 degrees of freedom and a significance level of 0.05, we find the critical value to be 1.711. Since our calculated t-value (1.49) is less than the critical value (1.711), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Know more about standard deviation here:

https://brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

Part A) Line plot is given in picture.

Part B) Mika walked for 16 days and covered a total distance of 2 miles.

Part A) The line plot of Mika's daily miles walked can be shown in picture.

Each x represents 1/8 mile. For example, the first five x's represent 5/8 mile.

Part B) To find how many days Mika walked, we count the number of x's on the line plot, which is 16. So, she walked for 16 days.

To find her total distance, we need to add up the distances represented by the x's on the line plot. Since each x represents 1/8 mile, we can count the number of x's and divide by 8 to get the total distance in miles.

There are a total of 16 x's, so Mika walked 16/8 = 2 miles in total.

To learn more about Line plot here:

https://brainly.com/question/29573088

#SPJ1

The calculated t-value is between -2.009 and 2.009, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to support the claim that μ ≠ 3.5.

To test the claim that μ ≠ 3.5, we need to perform a hypothesis test.

The null hypothesis (H0) is that μ = 3.5, and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that μ ≠ 3.5.

We have a sample size of n = 51, and a level of significance of α = 0.05.

We can use a t-test for the mean with unknown population standard deviation since we do not know the population standard deviation.

The test statistic is calculated as:

t = (x - μ) / (s / √(n))

Where x is the sample mean, μ is the hypothesized population mean, s is the sample standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

If the calculated t-value is greater than the critical t-value for a two-tailed test with α = 0.05 and degrees of freedom = n - 1, we reject the null hypothesis.

The critical t-value for a two-tailed test with α = 0.05 and degrees of freedom = 50 (n - 1) is ± 2.009.

Therefore, if the calculated t-value is less than -2.009 or greater than 2.009, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence to support the claim that μ ≠ 3.5.

If the calculated t-value is between -2.009 and 2.009, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to support the claim that μ ≠ 3.5.

To learn more about null hypothesis here:

brainly.com/question/28920252#

#SPJ11

Answer:

3/4c

Step-by-step explanation:

"The product of 3/4 and c" is represented by the phrase 3/4c.

Mathematical expressions are sentences that have a minimum of two numbers or variables, at least one arithmetic operation, and the term.

The phrase "the product of 3/4 and c" is presented here.

We now need to come up with a good expression for this.

The following are offered as a result of our analysis of the provided statement.

3/4 is a reference to a number, or a constant.

C stands for the variable.

The mathematical procedure between a number and a variable is referred to as the product.

Hence, it can be written as per the accepted manner of expression.

=> 3/4 x c

=> 3/4 c

The 98% confidence interval for the population mean (μ) is approximately (2.711, 3.009).

1: Identify the given data

Sample size (n) = 150 students

Sample mean (x) = 2.86

Population standard deviation (σ) = 0.78

Confidence level = 98%

2: Find the critical z-value (z*) for a 98% confidence level

Using a z-table or calculator, you'll find that the critical z-value for a 98% confidence level is 2.33 (approximately).

3: Calculate the standard error (SE)

SE = σ / √n

SE = 0.78 / √150 ≈ 0.064

4: Calculate the margin of error (ME)

ME = z* × SE

ME = 2.33 × 0.064 ≈ 0.149

5: Construct the confidence interval

Lower limit = x - ME = 2.86 - 0.149 ≈ 2.711

Upper limit = x + ME = 2.86 + 0.149 ≈ 3.009

The 98% confidence interval is approximately (2.711, 3.009).

Learn more about Confidence interval:

https://brainly.com/question/17097944

#SPJ11

If the customer estimates the time using a 99% confidence interval, The correct answer is 2.8679.

To find the margin of error, we need to use the formula:

Margin of error = z* (standard deviation / square root of sample size)

First, we need to find the z-score for a 99% confidence interval. Using a z-score table or calculator, we find that the z-score is 2.576.

Next, we plug in the values we have:

Margin of error = 2.576 * (5.603 / sqrt(29)) = 2.8679

Therefore, the margin of error is approximately 2.8679.
To calculate the margin of error for a 99% confidence interval, we'll use the following formula:

Margin of Error = Z-score * (Standard Deviation / √Sample Size)

In this case, the sample size is 29, the average delivery time is 23.34, and the standard deviation is 5.603. For a 99% confidence interval, the Z-score is approximately 2.576.

Margin of Error = 2.576 * (5.603 / √29)

Margin of Error ≈ 2.576 * (5.603 / 5.385)

Margin of Error ≈ 2.8679

Know more about margin of error here:

https://brainly.com/question/29101642

#SPJ11

Answer:

1/36

Step-by-step explanation:

There are a total of 36 possible combinations. Of those 36 combinations, only 1 would result in rolling two 2's.

Therefore, the probability would be 1 [outcome]/36 [total outcomes], which cannot be simplified any further.

816 cannot be part of Larry's pattern, since it is not obtained by subtracting 12 from the previous term. Therefore, the answer is B.

In Larry's number pattern, each term is obtained by subtracting 12 from the previous term. We can check whether each of the given answer choices can be part of Larry's pattern by performing this subtraction:

900 - 12 = 888

888 - 12 = 876

876 - 12 = 864

756 - 12 = 744

816 - 12 = 804

736 - 12 = 724

624 - 12 = 612

Therefore, 816 could not be a part of Larry's pattern

Learn more about identifying patterns:-

https://brainly.com/question/28580633

#SPJ4

If the numbers belong to a population, in symbols a deviation is x - μ. For sample data, in symbols, a deviation is x - x¯. True

The standard deviation is a gauge of how evenly distributed a set of numbers is. Since total variance is general average of squared deviations from the mean, it is the square root of the variance. Further, The deviation is a statistic that expresses how distant a single data point is from a mean, such as the population mean (denoted by u ) or sample mean (denoted by x ).

For a population, x - represents the difference between a data point's departure from the population mean. When using sample data, the difference between a data point (x) and the sample mean (x) is calculated as follows: x - x, where x is the average of the sample data.

Complete Question:

If the numbers belong to a population, in symbols a deviation is x - μ. For sample data, in symbols, a deviation is x - x¯. True/False

Read more about deviation on:

https://brainly.com/question/24298037

#SPJ4

A Pearson's product-moment correlation can result in a coefficient ranging from -1 to 1, with 0 indicating no correlation and positive or negative values indicating the direction and strength of the correlation.

A coefficient close to 1 or -1 indicates a strong correlation, while a coefficient close to 0 indicates a weak correlation. It is important to note that correlation does not imply causation and that the results should be interpreted with caution. Additionally, the validity of the results depends on the quality of the data and the content loaded into the analysis.

Know more about Pearson's product-moment correlation here:

https://brainly.com/question/28126889

#SPJ11

the probability corresponding to this z-score in a standard normal distribution table, we find that the probability of the mean score of these 50 students being 21 or higher is 0.0319 or about 3.2%.

The first part of the question asks for the probability that a single student is randomly chosen from all those taking the test scores 21 or higher. To solve this, we need to find the z-score corresponding to a score of 21 or higher, using the formula:

z = (x - µ) / σ

where x is the score, µ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation. Substituting the given values, we get:

z = (21 - 18.6) / 5.9 = 0.41

Looking up the probability corresponding to this z-score in a standard normal distribution table, we find that the probability of a student scoring 21 or higher is 0.3393 or about 34%.

Next, we are asked to find the mean and standard deviation of the sample mean score of 50 students. Since the sample size is sufficiently large (n ≥ 30), we can use the Central Limit Theorem to approximate the sample mean as normally distributed, with mean equal to the population mean (µ = 18.6) and a standard deviation equal to the population standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size (σ / √n = 5.9 / √50 = 0.835). Therefore, the mean of the sample mean score ¯x is also 18.6, and the standard deviation is 0.835.

Finally, we need to find the probability that the mean score of these 50 students is 21 or higher. We can again use the formula for the z-score:

z = (x - µ) / (σ / √n)

Substituting the given values, we get:

z = (21 - 18.6) / (5.9 / √50) = 1.86

Looking up the probability corresponding to this z-score in a standard normal distribution table, we find that the probability of the mean score of these 50 students being 21 or higher is 0.0319 or about 3.2%.

learn more about probability

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The statement that "If  function f '(x) > 0 for 3 < x < 5, then f is increasing on (3, 5)" is determined to be True.

If the derivative of a function f is positive on an interval, it means that the slope of the function is positive on that interval. This, in turn, means that the function is increasing on that interval. Therefore, if f '(x) > 0 for 3 < x < 5, then f is increasing on (3, 5).

The statement is based on the fact that the derivative of a function represents its instantaneous rate of change or slope. When the derivative is positive, the function is increasing, meaning that its output values are getting larger as its input values increase.

Thus, if f '(x) > 0 for 3 < x < 5, it implies that the slope of f is positive on the interval (3, 5), and therefore, f is increasing on that interval.

Learn more about Function :

https://brainly.com/question/30597384

#SPJ4

The graph of the functions f(x) and g(x) shows that f(x) is a straight line that increases as x increases, while g(x) is a parabola that increases as x increases. Therefore, all of the statements given are true.

An asymptote is a straight line or curve that approaches a given curve arbitrarily closely but never meets or crosses it.

The correct answers are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8.

The graph of the functions f(x) and g(x) shows that f(x) is a straight line that increases as x increases, while g(x) is a parabola that increases as x increases.

From the table and graph, it is clear that both functions go to positive and negative infinity as x approaches positive and negative infinity, respectively, so there is no maximum or minimum value for either function.

Additionally, both functions have a horizontal asymptote at y=0 and y=1 for x values greater than zero but not going to positive infinity.

This means that the minimum for g(x) is almost at 0 and the minimum for f(x) is almost at 1. Therefore, all of the statements given are true.

For more questions related to asymptote

https://brainly.com/question/30197395

#SPJ1

(i) To show that both X and n/n-1 S^2 are unbiased estimators of λ, we need to show that E(X) = λ and E(n/n-1 S^2) = λ.

For X, we know that the expected value of a Poisson distribution with parameter λ is λ, so:

E(X) = λ

Therefore, X is an unbiased estimator of λ.

For n/n-1 S^2, we can use the fact that the variance of a Poisson distribution with parameter λ is also λ:

Var(X) = λ

And the sample variance S^2 is an unbiased estimator of the population variance:

E(S^2) = Var(X) = λ

Using the formula for the sample variance, we have:

S^2 = (1/n-1) * ∑(Xi - Xbar)^2

Where Xbar is the sample mean.

Taking the expected value of this expression, we have:

E(S^2) = (1/n-1) * E(∑(Xi - Xbar)^2)

We can expand the sum as follows:

∑(Xi - Xbar)^2 = ∑(Xi^2 - 2XiXbar + Xbar^2)

Using the fact that E(Xi) = λ and E(Xbar) = λ, we can simplify this expression:

E(S^2) = (1/n-1) * E(∑(Xi^2) - 2nλ^2 + nλ^2)

The first term can be expressed as follows:

∑(Xi^2) = nλ + nλ^2

Using this expression and simplifying, we have:

E(S^2) = λ

Therefore, n/n-1 S^2 is also an unbiased estimator of λ.

(ii) The Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) gives a lower bound on the variance of any unbiased estimator of a parameter. For the Poisson distribution, the CRLB with respect to λ is:

CRLB(λ) = 1 / n * λ

(iii) To determine which estimator should be preferred, we can compare their variances. The variance of X is also λ, since it is a Poisson distribution with parameter λ.

The variance of n/n-1 S^2 is:

Var(n/n-1 S^2) = Var(S^2) / (n-1)^2

Using the formula for the variance of the sample variance, we have:

Var(S^2) = 2λ^2 / (n-1)

Substituting this into the expression for the variance of n/n-1 S^2, we have:

Var(n/n-1 S^2) = 2λ^2 / (n-1)^3

Comparing the variances, we can see that:

Var(n/n-1 S^2) < Var(X)

Therefore, n/n-1 S^2 should be preferred as an estimator of λ, since it has a lower variance than X.

Learn more about Poisson Distribution here: brainly.in/question/18892285

#SPJ11

In 2009, the naming rights for the 122 teams in the four major US professional sports leagues (NFL, NBA, MLB, and NHL) earned those franchises approximately $3.6 billion.

In 2009, the naming rights deals for the 122 teams across the NFL, NBA, MLB, and NHL generated approximately $3.6 billion for those franchises. These deals allow companies to attach their name to a stadium or arena, which can provide valuable exposure and brand recognition.

The amount earned from these deals can vary widely based on factors such as the popularity of the team and the location of the stadium or arena. Despite fluctuations in the economy and the sports industry, naming rights deals have remained a significant source of revenue for professional sports franchises.

To learn more about franchises; click here:

https://brainly.com/question/3687222

#SPJ11

Answer: Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine whether three lengths can form a triangle, we need to check if the sum of the two smaller lengths is greater than the largest length.

Let's order the given lengths from smallest to largest:

14yd, 19yd, 31yd

Now, we can check if the sum of the two smaller lengths (14yd and 19yd) is greater than the largest length (31yd):

14yd + 19yd = 33yd

Since 33yd is greater than 31yd, we know that the three lengths can form a triangle.

Therefore, the answer is yes, 31yd, 14yd, and 19yd can form a triangle.

Answer:

12x-6y+2

Step-by-step explanation:

-2 (-6x) -2 (3y) -2 x -1

12x - 6y - 2 x -1

12x-6y+2

The order of the PDEs, their linearity, and homogeneity are:

(a) Order: 2, Linear, Homogeneous
(b) Order: 1, Non-linear, Inhomogeneous
(c) Order: 3, Linear, Homogeneous


(a) yuxx + xuyy = 0
This PDE has second-order partial derivatives (uxx and uyy). It is linear because the highest power of u or its derivatives is 1. It is homogeneous because there are no terms without u or its derivatives.

(b) (x + y)u + eˣ + xyday = 0
This PDE has a first-order partial derivative (day). It is non-linear because the term xyday contains a product of u and a dependent variable (y). It is inhomogeneous because of the eˣ term, which does not contain u or its derivatives.

(c) Uyu + ux = Uxyz + xyz
This PDE has third-order partial derivatives (Uxyz). It is linear because the highest power of u or its derivatives is 1. It is homogeneous because there are no terms without u or its derivatives.

To know more about partial derivatives click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31397807#

#SPJ11

The dimensions of the base are [tex]25 \sqrt{2} by 100/ \sqrt{2}[/tex], and the height of the box is [tex]5 \sqrt{2}[/tex]

Let's start by defining the variables we need:

L: length of the base

W: width of the base

H: height of the box

From the problem statement, we know that:

L = 4W (the length of the base is 4 times larger than the width)

V = LWH = 25 (the volume of the box is 25 cubic feet)

We want to minimize the cost of construction, which is composed of two

parts: the cost of the base and the cost of the four sides.

Let's write expressions for these costs:

Cost of the base: 5LW

Cost of the four sides: 4WH + 2LH

The total cost is then:

C = 5LW + 3(4WH + 2LH)

Substituting L = 4W and V = LWH = 25, we get:

C = 5(4W)W + 3(4W)(25/4W) + 3(2H)(25/W)

Simplifying and factoring out 25, we get:

C = 75 + 30W + 150/H

To minimize C, we need to find the values of W and H that minimize this expression. We can use calculus for that:

[tex]dC/dW = 30 - 150/H^2 = 0[/tex]

[tex]dC/dH = -150W/H^2 = 0[/tex]

From the second equation, we can see that either W = 0 or H = 0, which is not physically meaningful. So we must have:

W = 5H

Substituting this into the first equation, we get:

[tex]30 - 150/H^2 = 0[/tex]

Solving for H, we get:

[tex]H = \sqrt{ (150/3)} = 5 \sqrt{2}[/tex]

Substituting this into W = 5H, we get:

[tex]W = 25 \sqrt{2}[/tex]

Finally, we can use L = 4W and V = LWH = 25 to find:

[tex]L = 100/ \sqrt{2} \\H = 5 \sqrt{2} \\W = 25 \sqrt{2}[/tex]

for such more question on dimensions

https://brainly.com/question/13847072

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation: Let’s solve this problem by scaling up. If one salesman sold 37 cards, which was 25% of the total cards sold for Mother’s Day, then we can find the total number of cards sold by dividing 37 by 0.25: 37 ÷ 0.25 = 148.

So, a total of 148 cards were sold for Mother’s Day at Bob’s gift shop.

The weighted mean of the percentages is 37.5%.

To find the weighted mean of the percentages, we need to multiply each percentage by its corresponding number surveyed, sum the products, and divide by the total number surveyed.

The calculation for the weighted mean is:

weighted mean = (1/total surveyed) * sum(percentages x number surveyed)

total surveyed = 2500 + 1500 + 3000 = 7000

(1) For the percentage favored 30:

30% x 2500 = 750

(2) For the percentage favored 25:

25% x 1500 = 375

(3) For the percentage favored 50:

50% x 3000 = 1500

Now we can add up these products:

750 + 375 + 1500 = 2625

Finally, we can divide by the total number surveyed to get the weighted mean:

weighted mean = 2625/7000 = 0.375

Therefore, the weighted mean of the percentages is 37.5%.

To learn more about weighted visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10069252

#SPJ11

From the binomial probability distribution the probability of finding five left-handers in a class of 30 students is equals to the 0.1861.

We have a class of total 30 students. Let's consider an event be X : students who are left-handed in class.

Total possible outcomes or results, n = 30

The probability that an individual is left-handed students, P(X) = 0.15 that is probability of success, p = 0.15

Probability of failure, q = 1 - p = 1 - 0.15

= 0.85

We have to determine probability of finding five left-handers, P( X = 5). Using the binomial Probability distribution formula is written as

P( X = x) = ⁿCₓ pˣ (1-p)⁽ⁿ⁻ˣ⁾

where, x --> observed value

n --> number of trials

p --> probability of success

Now, plug all known values in above formula, P( X = 5) = ³⁰C₅ p⁵ (1-p)³⁰⁻⁵

= ³⁰C₅ (0.15)⁵ (0.85)²⁵

= 142,506 × 0.0000013059

= 0.1861

Hence, required value is 0.1861.

For more information about binomial probability, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15246027

#SPJ4

The value of x in the equation is 9

From the information given, we have that the angles are supplementary.

Then, it is important that we note the definition of supplementary angles.

Supplementary angles are simply defined as pair of angles that sum to 180 degrees. They must be two angles.

Also, angles on a straight line is equal to 180 degrees.

From the information given, we have that;

8x + 6 and 102 degrees are supplementary.

Then,

8x + 6 + 102 = 180

collect the like terms, we get;

8x = 180 - 108

subtract the values

8x = 72

x = 9

Learn about supplementary angles at: https://brainly.com/question/12919120

#SPJ1

Question

If the angles are supplementary, What is the value of x?

(8x + 6)

102°

▸

The number of hours that Aiden played the video game is 6 hours.

We can start by finding 3/4 of the total time that Mr. Peña played video games. To do this, we can multiply 3/4 by the total time of 8 hours:

= 3/4 * 8 hours

= (3 x 8) / 4 hours

= 24/4 hours

= 6 hours

Therefore, Aiden played video games for 6 hours, which is 3/4 of the total time that Mr. Peña played video games.

To understand why we multiply 3/4 by 8, we can think of it as finding 3/4 of a whole. In this case, the whole is the total time of 8 hours that Mr. Peña played video games. To find 3/4 of the whole, we can multiply the whole by 3/4. This gives us the fraction of the whole that we are interested in, which in this case represents the time that Aiden played video games.

To find more about video game

https://brainly.com/question/8910338

#SPJ4

For a cumulative distribution function of the random variable X defined as

[tex]F(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 0 & \quad x < 0 \\0.2 x & \quad0 \leqslant x < 5 \\ 1 & \quad5 \leqslant x \end{array} \right.[/tex] the probability value of P(X>5) is equals to the 0.

The cumulative distribution function (CDF) is used to the probabilities of a random variable with values less than or equal to x. It describe the probability for a discrete, continuous or mixed random variable. The cumulative distribution function (CDF) of random variable X is written as F(x) = P(X≤x), for all x∈R.

We have a random variable X, the cumulative distribution function of the variable X is written as [tex]F(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 0 & \quad x < 0 \\0.2 x & \quad0 \leqslant x < 5 \\ 1 & \quad5 \leqslant x \end{array} \right.[/tex]

We have to determine value of probability P( X> 5) . As we know, P( X > 5) = 1 - P( X ≤ 5)

= 1 - F( 5)

= 1 - 1

= 0

Hence, required value is equals to the 0.

For more information about cumulative distribution function, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/30657052

#SPJ4

Complete question :

The above figure complete the question

Suppose the cumulative distribution function of the random variable X is present in above figure. Find the value of P(X>5).

The slope of the tangent line to the curve at the point (3, 2) is 7/6.

To find the slope of the tangent line to the curve at a point, we need to take the derivative of the curve with respect to x and evaluate it at that point.

We can start by rearranging the equation of the curve to get it in terms of y:

3y² = 2x² + 2xy - 6

Next, we can take the derivative of both sides with respect to x:

6y * dy/dx = 4x + 2y * dx/dx

Simplifying:

dy/dx = (4x + 2y) / (6y)

Now we can evaluate this expression at the point (3, 2):

dy/dx = (4(3) + 2(2)) / (6(2)) = 14/12 = 7/6

Therefore, the slope of the tangent line to the curve at the point (3, 2) is 7/6.

Learn more about curve

https://brainly.com/question/29990557

#SPJ4

The economist can conclude that the mean FICO score is less than 720 with a 95% confidence level.

To answer this question, we can use a one-sample t-test with a significance level of α=0.05.

First, we need to calculate the t-statistic:

t = (sample mean - hypothesized mean) / (standard deviation / √(sample size))

t = (695 - 720) / (65 / sqrt(60))
t = -2.81

Next, we need to find the critical t-value using a t-distribution table with 59 degrees of freedom (sample size - 1) and a significance level of α=0.05.

The critical t-value is -1.67 (one-tailed test).

Since the calculated t-statistic (-2.81) is less than the critical t-value (-1.67), we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean FICO score is significantly lower than 720. In other words, based on the sample data, the economist can conclude that the mean FICO score is less than 720 with a 95% confidence level.

To learn more about confidence level here:

brainly.com/question/30229866#

#SPJ11

Once more, since there is no solution to this equation, N(t) lacks an inflection point. As a result, the flu is spreading continuously; there is no particular day when it is spreading the quickest.

Mathematics is concerned with numbers and their variations, equations and related structures, shapes and their places, and possible placements for them. The relationship between a collection of inputs, each of which has an associated output, is referred to as a "function". An relationship between inputs and outputs, where each input yields a single, distinct output, is called a function. Each function has a domain and a codomain, often known as a scope. The letter f is frequently used to represent functions (x). X is the input. The four main types of functions that are offered are on functions, one-to-one functions, many-to-one functions, within functions, and on functions.

We must locate the largest value of the function N(t) with respect to t in order to determine the day on which the illness is spreading the quickest.

[tex]N(t) = 1 + 12e^(-0.95t)\\N'(t) = -11.4e^(-0.95t)\\-11.4e^{(-0.95t)} = 0\\e^{(-0.95t)} = 0\\[/tex]

Since there is no answer to this equation, there is no maximum or lowest value for N(t). However, by calculating the second derivative of N(t) with respect to t, we can determine the inflection point of N(t):

[tex]N''(t) = 10.83e^(-0.95t)\\10.83e^(-0.95t) = 0\\e^(-0.95t) = 0\\[/tex]

Once more, since there is no solution to this equation, N(t) lacks an inflection point. As a result, the flu is spreading continuously; there is no particular day when it is spreading the quickest.

No one day sees a greater spread of the flu.

To know more about function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28193995

#SPJ1

The results of a poll Danielle conducted among her classmates regarding the amount of movies they saw during the summer are listed below in Numerical order: 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 4, 5, 6, 6, 8, 10, 12, 12, 14.

What is ascending numerical order?

Numbers are organized from smallest to largest when they are placed in ascending order. Before we can put the numbers in any order, we must first compare the numbers.

Compare before ordering. In descending sequence, the following numbers: Count the number of digits in each number.

Numerical order: 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 4, 5, 6, 6, 8, 10, 12, 12, 14.

To know more about numerical order visit,

brainly.com/question/28311889

#SPJ1