Find the dimensions of the largest rectangle that can be inscribed in the night triangle with sides 3, 4 and 5 if i. two sides of the rectangle are on the legs of the triangle, and if ii. a side of the rectangle is on the hypotenuse of the triangle

The probability that a continuous random variable takes on exactly a specific value is 0 because there are an infinite number of possible values that the variable can take on. Option (D) is the correct answer.

For any continuous random variable, the probability that the random variable takes on exactly a specific value is 0. This is because continuous random variables can take on an infinite number of possible values within a given range. As such, the probability of any single specific value occurring is infinitesimally small.

To understand why this is the case, consider a real-life example of measuring the height of a person. A continuous random variable is used to represent the height of a person because height can take on an infinite number of values between any two given values. For instance, if we measure the height of a person to be exactly 5 feet and 10 inches, we know that the true height of the person is not exactly 5 feet and 10 inches. It could be slightly taller or slightly shorter than 5 feet and 10 inches, depending on the precision of the measuring tool used.

To learn more about Probability :

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11

a) C(x) = 3954100

b) Average cost = 2325.94117

c) Marginal cost = 4000

d) Minimizing average cost = 210

e) Minimum average cost =  1020

What is the cost function?

A loss function, also known as a cost function, is a function used in mathematical optimization and decision theory that transfers an event or the values of one or more variables onto a real number that intuitively represents some "cost" connected to the occurrence. A loss function is the goal of an optimization problem.

Here, we have

Given: Given cost function C(x) = 44100 + 600x + x².

a) The average cost at the production level is 1700.

C(x) = 44100 + 600(1700) + (1700)²

C(x) = 44100 + 1020000 + 2890000

C(x) = 3954100

b) C(x) /x = Average cost

= C(1700) /1700 = 3954100/1700

= 2325.94117

c) dc/dx = 600 + 2x

x = 1700

dc/dx = 600 + 2(1700)

= 600 + 3400

= 4000

d) For minimizing average cost

[tex]\frac{d(C(x)}{dx}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{d}{dx}[44100/x + 600 + x] = 0[/tex]

= -44100/x² +1 = 0

x = √44100

x = 210

e) Minimum average cost

C(210)/210 = 214200/210

= 1020.

To learn more about the cost function from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/2292799

#SPJ1

(a) The length of /AC/ is 12 m

(b) The length of /AG/ is 12.5 m

(c) The angle line AG makes with the floor is 16.3°

Length is the distance between two points.

(a) To calculate the length AC of the cuboid, we use the formula below

Formula:

Where:

Substitute these values into equation 1

(b) Similarly, to calculate the value of AG, WE use the formula below

Where:

Substitute these values into equation 2

(c) Finally, to find the angle that AG make to the floor, we use the formula below

Given:

Substitute these values into equation 3

Learn more about length here: https://brainly.com/question/28108430

#SPJ1

The probability that 3 of 8 stolen cars will be recovered is 0.296 or approximately 0.30.

The given problem involves a binomial distribution, where the probability of success (recovering a stolen car) is p = 0.78 and the number of trials is n = 8. We need to find the probability of getting exactly 3 successes.

The probability of getting exactly k successes in n trials can be calculated using the binomial probability formula:

P(k successes) = (n choose k) * [tex]p^k[/tex] * [tex]{1-p}^{n-k}[/tex]

where (n choose k) represents the binomial coefficient, which can be calculated as:

(n choose k) = n! / (k! * (n-k)!)

where n! represents the factorial of n.

Using the above formula with k = 3, n = 8, and p = 0.78, we get:

P(3 successes) = (8 choose 3) * 0.78³ * (1-0.78)⁵

= 56 * 0.78³ * 0.22⁵

= 0.296

To learn more about probability click on,

https://brainly.com/question/14464283

#SPJ4

To find the mean of the sampling distribution for the proportion of supporters with sample size n = 212, we use the formula: Mean = True Proportion = 0.52. The standard error of this distribution is 0.048.

Based on your question, we need to find the mean and standard error of the sampling distribution for the proportion of supporters with a sample size of n = 212.

The true proportion of voters who support the new fire district is given as p = 0.52. The complement, which represents those who do not support the fire district, is q = 1 - p = 1 - 0.52 = 0.48.

Mean of the sampling distribution: The mean of the sampling distribution for the proportion is equal to the true proportion, which is p. Therefore, the mean is 0.52.

Standard error of the sampling distribution: The standard error of the sampling distribution for the proportion is calculated using the formula SE = sqrt(p * q / n), where p is the true proportion, q is its complement, and n is the sample size.

SE = sqrt(0.52 * 0.48 / 212) = sqrt(0.2496 / 212) = sqrt(0.001176) ≈ 0.0343

So, the mean of the sampling distribution is 0.52, and the standard error is approximately 0.0343.

Learn more about sampling distribution here: brainly.com/question/13501743

#SPJ11

A hypothesis is a tentative explanation that predicts the relationship between two or more variables to be tested, whereas a theory is a more general and established explanation that predicts future outcomes.

A hypothesis is a statement or proposition that is assumed to be true in order to prove or disprove a theorem or conjecture through logical reasoning and mathematical proof.

A theory is a systematic and coherent set of concepts, principles, and mathematical models that explain a wide range of related phenomena and make predictions that can be tested and verified through experimentation or observation.

According to the given information:

In scientific research, a hypothesis is a specific prediction or statement that proposes a possible relationship between two or more variables, which can be tested through experimentation or observation. It is a tentative explanation that seeks to explain an observed behavior or phenomenon, and it can be used to guide future research and experimentation.

On the other hand, a theory is a more general and comprehensive explanation of an observed behavior or phenomenon that has been tested and supported by numerous experiments and observations. A theory can be thought of as a well-established and widely accepted explanation that can be used to predict future outcomes and guide further research.

To summarize, a hypothesis is a specific prediction that can be tested through experimentation or observation, while a theory is a more general and established explanation that has been supported by numerous experiments and observations.

To know more about hypothesis and theory visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17485665

#SPJ1

The variance estimate using the sample mean for Data Set A is 20.621.

The variance estimate using a mean score of 15 is 21.238.

The variance estimate using a mean score of 16 is 17.810.

Variance estimates are based on a relatively small sample size of 14, and may not be representative of the true population variance.

To compute variance estimates for Data Set A, we can use the following definitional formula:

[tex]variance = \Sigma(xi - x)^2 / (n - 1)[/tex]where xi is the i-th score in the data set, x is the mean score, and n is the sample size.

Using the sample mean for Data Set A:

First, we need to compute the sample mean x for Data Set A:

[tex]x = (23 + 13 + 13 + 7 + 9 + 19 + 11 + 19 + 15 + 14 + 17 + 21 + 21 + 17) / 14[/tex]

x = 15.1429 (rounded to 4 decimal places)

Compute the variance using the above formula:

[tex]variance = \Sigma(xi - x)^2 / (n - 1)[/tex]

[tex]variance = [(23 - 15.1429)^2 + (13 - 15.1429)^2 + ... + (17 - 15.1429)^2] / (14 - 1)[/tex]

variance = 20.6207 (rounded to 3 decimal places)

The variance estimate using the sample mean for Data Set A is 20.621.

Using a mean score of 15:

If we use a mean score of 15, we can compute the variance using the same formula as above, but with x = 15:

[tex]variance = [(23 - 15)^2 + (13 - 15)^2 + ... + (17 - 15)^2] / (14 - 1)[/tex]

variance = 21.2381 (rounded to 3 decimal places)

The variance estimate using a mean score of 15 is 21.238.

Using a mean score of 16:

A mean score of 16, we can compute the variance using the same formula as above, but with x = 16:

[tex]variance = [(23 - 16)^2 + (13 - 16)^2 + ... + (17 - 16)^2] / (14 - 1)[/tex]

variance = 17.8095 (rounded to 3 decimal places)

The variance estimate using a mean score of 16 is 17.810.

Conclusions:

From the above results, we can see that the variance estimate is sensitive to the choice of the mean score.

As the mean score increases, the variance estimates decrease, and as the mean score decreases, the variance estimates increase.

This is because the variance is a measure of how spread out the data is from the mean score.

The mean score is higher, the data tends to be more tightly clustered around the mean, resulting in a smaller variance estimate.

Conversely, when the mean score is lower, the data tends to be more spread out, resulting in a larger variance estimate.

The variance estimate using the sample mean (20.621) is between the variance estimates using a mean score of 15 (21.238) and a mean score of 16 (17.810).

The sample mean is a reasonable estimate of the population mean, and that the data is not overly skewed in one direction or the other.

Variance estimates are based on a relatively small sample size of 14, and may not be representative of the true population variance.

For similar questions on variance

https://brainly.com/question/13130547

#SPJ11

The value of the integral is 1710. To evaluate the integral S1 0 (1+1/2u⁴ - 2/5u⁹)du, we need to integrate each term separately.

∫1du = u + C, where C is the constant of integration.

To integrate 1/2u⁴, we can use the power rule of integration:

∫1/2u⁴ du = (1/2) ∫u⁴ du = (1/2) * u⁵/5 + C = u⁵/10 + C

To integrate -2/5u⁹, we can also use the power rule of integration:

∫(-2/5)u⁹ du = (-2/5) ∫u⁹ du = (-2/5) * u¹⁰/10 + C = -u¹⁰/25 + C

Putting everything together, we have:

∫(1+1/2u⁴ - 2/5u⁹)du = ∫1du + ∫1/2u⁴ du - ∫2/5u⁹ du

= u + u⁵/10 - (-u¹⁰/25) + C

= u + u⁵/10 + u¹⁰/25 + C

Now, we can evaluate the definite integral by plugging in the limits of integration:

S1 0 (1+1/2u⁴ - 2/5u⁹)du = [u + u⁵/10 + u¹⁰/25]₁⁰

= (10 + 10⁵/10 + 10¹⁰/25) - (0 + 0⁵/10 + 0¹⁰/25)

= 10 + 1000 + 400000/25

= 10 + 1000 + 16000

= 1710

Therefore, the value of the integral is 1710.

Learn more about “ power rule of integration “ visit here;

https://brainly.com/question/14502499

#SPJ4

The required z-test statistic is 2.45 and p-value for this test is approximately 0.014

Given,

Population mean waiting time for service, μ = 6 minutes

Sample size, n = 60

Sample mean waiting time for service is, M = 6.5 minutes

Population standard deviation is, σ = 1.9 minutes

To determine the p-value for this test.

Since it is claimed that customers spend an average of 6 minutes waiting for service at the store's deli counter; therefore, the appropriate null and the alternate hypothesis are:

H0:μ=6

Ha:μ≠6

This corresponds to a two-tailed test.

Since the population standard deviation is known; therefore, the z-test is appropriate.

Assuming the null hypothesis true, the calculated z-value is obtained as:

z=M−μ/(σ/√n)=6.5−6/(1.9/√60)≈2.446

Therefore, the required calculated z-value is approximately 2.45.

The two-tailed p-value corresponding to the z-value of 2.45 is:

p−value≈ .014286

Therefore, the required p-value for this test is approximately 0.014

(rounded to three decimals).

The result is significant at p < 0.10.

learn more about statistics here,

https://brainly.com/question/15525560

#SPJ11

There is not enough evidence to conclude that the average age of students attending the university has changed at a significance level of 0.05.

Let's break down the problem and identify the appropriate statistical test, the null and alternative hypotheses, the degrees of freedom (if applicable), the critical value, and finally, the results, decision, and conclusions.

State the appropriate statistical test:
Since we are comparing the sample mean to a known population mean and the population standard deviation is given, we will use a single sample z-test.

H0 (Null Hypothesis): The average age of students has not changed (µ = 22.4 years)
H1 (Alternative Hypothesis): The average age of students has changed (µ ≠ 22.4 years)

Degrees of freedom (df) is not applicable in this case as we are using a z-test.

Critical Value:
Using a significance level (α) of 0.05 and a two-tailed test, the critical z-scores are -1.96 and 1.96.

Results:
To calculate the test statistic, use the formula: z = (sample mean - population mean) / (population standard deviation / sqrt(sample size))

[tex]z = (23.5 - 22.4) / (7.6 / sqrt(150)) = 1.1 / (7.6 / 12.25) ≈ 1.798[/tex]

Decision:
Since the calculated z-score (1.798) is within the critical values range (-1.96 and 1.96), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Conclusions:
There is not enough evidence to conclude that the average age of students attending the university has changed at a significance level of 0.05.

To know more about significance level , refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/13947717

#SPJ11

If a = 17.5, quadrilateral DEFG will be a parallelogram.

What is quadrilateral?

A quadrilateral is a geometric shape that has four sides and four vertices (corners). The angles formed by the sides of a quadrilateral add up to 360 degrees. Some common examples of quadrilaterals include squares, rectangles, parallelograms, trapezoids, and kites.

For a quadrilateral to be a parallelogram, opposite sides must be parallel.

Therefore, EF || DG and DE || FG.

Since EF and DG are both horizontal, they must have the same y-coordinate.

So, EF = DG = 18.

Also, DE and FG are both vertical, so they must have the same x-coordinate.

So, FG = DE = 2a - 17.

Since DE and FG are equal, we have:

2a - 17 = 18

Solving for a, we get:

a = 17.5

Therefore, if a = 17.5, quadrilateral DEFG will be a parallelogram.

To know more about the quadrilateral visit :

https://brainly.com/question/29635320

#SPJ1

The square inches of paint that will be needed for the sides is 3858.45 sq in

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The pentagonal prism

The square inches of paint that will be needed for the sides is the surface area of the pentagonal, and this is calculated as

Area = 5ah + 1/2√[5(5+2√5)]a²

Where

a = side length = 27 inches

h = height = 10 inches

Substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

Area = 5 * 27 * 10 + 1/2√[5(5+2√5)] * 27²

Evaluate

Area = 3858.45

Hence, the square inches of paint that will be needed for the sides is 3858.45 sq in

Read more about surface area at

https://brainly.com/question/26403859

#SPJ1

The standard deviation for the random variable X will be 1.5811.

The number of twos that come up in 18 rolls of a die is a binomial random variable, denoted by X, with parameters n=18 and p=1/6 (since the probability of rolling a two on any one roll is 1/6).

The mean of a binomial distribution is given by μ = np, and the variance is given by σ^2 = np(1-p). Thus, in this case, we have:

μ = np = 18 × 1/6 = 3

σ^2 = np(1-p) = 18 × 1/6 × (1 - 1/6) = 2.5

The standard deviation is the square root of the variance, so:

σ = √(2.5) = 1.5811 (rounded to four decimal places)

Therefore, if this experiment is repeated many times, we would expect the number of twos to have a mean of 3 and a standard deviation of approximately 1.5811.

To learn more about standard deviation, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

The length of the rectangle with an area of 140 square meters is equal to 14 meters.

Area of the rectangle = 140square meters

Let us consider the length of the rectangle be L

and the width of the rectangle be W.

The width is 4 meters less than the length, so we can write,

W = L - 4

The area of the rectangle is 140 square meters,

Area of the rectangle = L x W

Substituting the expression for W into the equation for the area, we get,

⇒Area of the rectangle = L x (L - 4)

Now plug in the value of the area and solve for L,

⇒ 140 = L x (L - 4)

⇒ 140 = L^2 - 4L

⇒ L^2 - 4L - 140 = 0

Solve this quadratic equation by factoring or by using the quadratic formula.

⇒ L^2 - 14L + 10L - 140 = 0

⇒(L - 14)(L + 10) = 0

This gives us two possible solutions for L,

L = 14 or L = -10.

Since the length of the rectangle cannot be negative,

Discard the negative solution

And conclude that the length of the rectangle is L = 14 meters.

⇒ width W = L - 4

                  = 14 - 4

                  = 10 meters.

Therefore, the length of the rectangle is equals to 14 meters.

Learn more about rectangle here

brainly.com/question/31433836

#SPJ4

The probability of obtaining 4 ones in a row when rolling a fair, six-sided die is 0.00077.

The probability of obtaining a one on any given roll of a fair, six-sided die is 1/6, since there is one outcome corresponding to rolling a one out of a total of six possible outcomes (rolling any one of the numbers 1 through 6).

By the multiplication rule for independent events, we can calculate this probability by multiplying the probabilities of each individual event:

P(rolling four ones in a row) = P(rolling a one on the first roll) × P(rolling a one on the second roll) × P(rolling a one on the third roll) × P(rolling a one on the fourth roll)

P(rolling four ones in a row) = (1/6) × (1/6) × (1/6) × (1/6)

P(rolling four ones in a row) = 1/6^4

P(rolling four ones in a row) = 1/1296

Therefore, the probability of obtaining four ones in a row when rolling a fair, six-sided die is approximately 0.00077, or about 0.077% (rounded to three decimal places).

This probability is very small, which means that it is unlikely to obtain four ones in a row when rolling a die. In fact, it would take an average of 1/0.00077 or about 1296 rolls to obtain four ones in a row.

To learn more about probability, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The associated standard score for this hypothesis test is 3.16. There is is evidence that more than 1/2 of the entire voting population would vote for the green party candidate for governor.

To determine whether the random sample of 1000 registered voters showing 550 votes for the Green Party candidate is evidence that more than half of the entire voting population would vote for the Green Party candidate, we will conduct a hypothesis test with the null hypothesis H0: p ≤ 0.5 and the alternative hypothesis Ha: p > 0.5. We will assume a Type I error rate of 0.05.

1: Calculate the sample proportion (p):

p = 550/1000 = 0.55

2: Calculate the standard error (SE):

SE = sqrt[(p * (1 - p))/n] = sqrt[(0.55 * 0.45)/1000] ≈ 0.0158

3: Calculate the z-score (standard score) for the hypothesis test:

z = (p - p₀) / SE = (0.55 - 0.5) / 0.0158 ≈ 3.16

4. From the p-value table, the p-value is 0.00078885

The associated p-value for this z-score is extremely small (less than 0.001), which means we can reject the null hypothesis H0: p ≤ 0.5 and conclude that there is evidence to support the alternative hypothesis Ha: p > 0.5.

The associated standard score is approximately 3.16. Therefore, this is evidence that more than 1/2 of the entire voting population would vote for the green party candidate.

Note: The question is incomplete. The complete question probably is: a newspaper took a random sample of 1000 registered voters and found that 550 would vote for the green party candidate for governor. Is this evidence that more than 1/2 of the entire voting population would vote for the green party candidate? to answer this question, you will have to test the hypothesis H0: p ≤ 0.5 versus Ha: p > 0.5. assume a type i error rate of 0.05. What is the associated standard score for this hypothesis test?

Learn more about Standard score:

https://brainly.com/question/13579780

#SPJ11

(1) The value of c that makes the equation a perfect square is 196 and the expression in factor form is 4(x - 7)².

(2) The value of x using completing the square method is x = ¹/₄ (19 ± √229).

To make the equation a perfect square trinomial, we need to take half of the coefficient of x and square it, and then add that result to the expression.

4x² - 28x + c

The coefficient of x is -28,

= ¹/₂(-28) =  -14.

(-14)² =  196.

Therefore, the value of c that makes the equation a perfect square trinomial is 196.

So, the expression in factor form is;

4x² - 28x + 196 = 4(x - 7)²

2. The solution of the equation by completing the square method;

4x² - 38x = -33

x² - (38/4)x = -33/4

half of coefficient of x = -38/8, the square = (-38/8)²;

(x - 38/8)² = -33/4 + 361/16

(x - 38/8)² = 229/16

x - 38/8 = ±√ (229/16)

x = ±√229/4 + 38/8

x = ±√229/4 + 19/4

x = ¹/₄ (19 ± √229)

Learn more about completing the square method here: https://brainly.com/question/26107616

#SPJ1

The correct interpretation of the slope in the context of the data is that for every additional year a professor works at a college, his/her salary is predicted to increase by $1,280.

The given regression equation for professor salaries is Salary = 95000 + 1280 (Years), where "Years" represents the number of years a professor has worked at a college, and "Salary" represents the annual salary (in dollars) the professor earns. The slope of 1280 in the regression equation represents the change in Salary for each unit increase in Years.

Therefore, for every additional year a professor works at a college, his/her salary is predicted to increase by $1,280. This means that as a professor gains more experience and works for more years at a college, their salary is expected to increase by $1,280 per year, according to the given regression equation.

Therefore, the correct interpretation of the slope is: For every additional year a professor works at a college, his/her salary is predicted to increase by $1,280.

To learn more about slope here:

brainly.com/question/11559942#

#SPJ11

If the perimeter of the smaller polygon is 48 centimeters and the ratio of the corresponding side lengths is 2:3, the perimeter of the larger polygon is 72 centimeters.

If two polygons are similar, it means that their corresponding angles are congruent and their corresponding sides are proportional. Let's denote the perimeter of the larger polygon as P.

Since the ratio of the corresponding side lengths is 2:3, we can set up the following proportion:

2/3 = perimeter of smaller polygon / perimeter of larger polygon

Solving for the perimeter of the larger polygon, we get:

perimeter of larger polygon = (3/2) x perimeter of smaller polygon

perimeter of larger polygon = (3/2) x 48

perimeter of larger polygon = 72

To learn more about ratio click on,

https://brainly.com/question/12585476

#SPJ4

The probability that fewer than 12 of the 21 randomly selected students prefer online exams is 0.0269, or 2.69%.

According to a study, 74% of students prefer online exams to in-class exams. If 21 students are randomly selected, you want to know the probability that fewer than 12 of these students prefer online exams.

To answer this question, we can use the binomial probability formula:

P(x) = C(n, x) × pˣ × (1-p)^(n-x)

where:
- P(x) is the probability of having exactly x successes in n trials
- C(n, x) is the number of combinations of n items taken x at a time
- n is the number of trials (21 students in this case)
- x is the number of successful trials (students preferring online exams)
- p is the probability of success (0.74, the percentage of students preferring online exams)

Since we want the probability of fewer than 12 students preferring online exams, we need to calculate the sum of probabilities for x = 0 to 11:

P(x < 12) = Σ [C(21, x) × 0.74ˣ × (1-0.74)⁽²¹⁻ˣ⁾] for x = 0 to 11

Using a calculator or statistical software to compute the probabilities, the sum of the probabilities for x = 0 to 11 is approximately 0.0269.

So, the probability that fewer than 12 of the 21 randomly selected students prefer online exams is 0.0269, or 2.69%.

To learn  more about probability here:

brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

The value of the principal investment would be = $12,500.75

We know that,

A principal investment is defined as the capital amount of money that is being deposited into an account with the purpose of receiving interest for a particular period of time.

The years of investment (t) = 9 years

The annual interest rate (r) = 3.9% = 3.9/100= 0.039

The total worth of the investment (A) = $17,757.16

Then, solve the equation for P

P = A / ert

P = 17,757.16 / e(0.039*9)

P = $12,500.75

Therefore, the principal amount that is needed which can be compounded continuously to get the total amount given = $12,500.75

Learn more about simple interest here:

brainly.com/question/25793394

#SPJ4

complete question:

After 9 years in an account with a 3.9% annual interest rate compounded continuously, an investment is worth a total of $17,757.16. What is the value of the principal investment? Around the answer to the nearest penny.

When Dustin distributes all of the liquid equally among the 7 bottles the amount in each bottle is 0.85 units.

A dot plot is a form of graph that uses dots along a number line to show how frequently data values occur. Each data value is represented as a dot in a dot plot, which is placed above the corresponding spot on the number line. The dots are piled vertically to illustrate the frequency of a value when many data values fall on the same spot on the number line. When displaying and analysing small to medium-sized data sets, dot plots are frequently employed since each data value may be simply represented by a dot on a number line.

From the graph we see that the amount of liquid in each bottle is:

0 units in one bottle.

1/2 units in three bottles = 3(1/2) = 3/2.

1 units in one bottle.

1 1/2 = (2 + 1) / 2 = 3/2 units in one bottle.

2 units in one bottle.

Now, the total amount of liquid is:

T = 0 + 3/2 + 1 + 3/2 + 2 = 6 units.

When the 6 units is divided among 7 bottles we have:

6 / 7 = 0.85

Hence, when Dustin distributes all of the liquid equally among the 7 bottles the amount in each bottle is 0.85 units.

Learn more about dot plot here:

https://brainly.com/question/22746300

#SPJ1

Answer:The set of numbers that could represent the lengths of the sides of a right triangle is 3, 4, 5.This is because these numbers satisfy the Pythagorean theorem, which states that in a right triangle, the sum of the squares of the two shorter sides (legs) is equal to the square of the longest side (hypotenuse). In other words, for a right triangle with legs a and b and hypotenuse c, a² + b² = c².In the case of 3, 4, 5, we have:3² + 4² = 9 + 16 = 25 = 5²So, these numbers could represent the lengths of the sides of a right triangle.The other sets of numbers, 8, 12, 16 and 16, 32, 36, and 9, 10, 11, do not satisfy the Pythagorean theorem and therefore cannot represent the lengths of the sides of a right triangle.

Step-by-step explanation:

True, a cubic centimeter (cm^3) is a unit of volume.

Volume is the measure of space that an object occupies, and the cubic centimeter is a commonly used unit to express volume. In a cubic centimeter, each side of the cube measures 1 centimeter, and the total volume is 1 centimeter x 1 centimeter x 1 centimeter = 1 cm^3.

Learn more about units here, https://brainly.com/question/777464

#SPJ11

The integral ∫(0 to 4) 1/(sqrt(x)(1+sqrt(x))) dx is equal to 2 ln(3), which corresponds to option C.

To determine whether the integral ∫(0 to 4) 1/(sqrt(x)(1+sqrt(x))) dx is divergent or convergent, and find its value, follow these steps:

Step 1: Make a substitution
Let u = sqrt(x), so x = u^2 and dx = 2u du.
The integral now becomes:
∫(0 to 2) 1/(u(1+u)) * 2u du

Step 2: Simplify the integral
The integral simplifies to:
∫(0 to 2) 2/(1+u) du

Step 3: Integrate the function
Integrate the simplified function with respect to u:
∫(0 to 2) 2/(1+u) du = 2 ∫(0 to 2) 1/(1+u) du = 2[ln(1+u)](0 to 2)

Step 4: Evaluate the definite integral
Evaluate the definite integral using the limits:
2[ln(1+2) - ln(1+0)] = 2[ln(3) - ln(1)] = 2(ln(3) - 0) = 2 ln(3)

So, the integral ∫(0 to 4) 1/(sqrt(x)(1+sqrt(x))) dx is equal to 2 ln(3), which corresponds to option C.

Learn more about divergent or convergent.

brainly.com/question/28202684

#SPJ11

The function used in Excel to find the "line of best fit" is called "Trendline". To add a trendline to a chart, you can right-click on a data series in the chart and select "Add Trendline" from the drop-down menu.

A trendline is a line that shows the general pattern or direction of a set of data. It's also known as a line of stylish fit or a retrogression line. A trendline can be added to a map in Excel to help  fantasize the relationship between two variables and to make  prognostications grounded on the data.  

When you add a trendline in Excel, you have the option to choose from several different types of retrogression models,  similar as direct, exponential, logarithmic, polynomial, power, and moving average. Each type of model fits a different type of data pattern, and it's important to choose the applicable model for your data.   In addition to adding a trendline, Excel also provides a residual plot to help you assess the  virtuousness of fit of the trendline.

Learn more about excel at

https://brainly.com/question/28045790

#SPJ4

Answer:

60%

Step-by-step explanation:

12 / 20 students did the homework

12 / 20 = 3 / 5 = 0.6

0.6 as a percent is 60%

So, 60% of the class did the homework

We can conclude that the one-sided 95% lower confidence interval for the probability of a missile hitting its target is 0 to 1, which is not a very useful or informative result.

To find the confidence interval, we first need to calculate the sample proportion, which is the number of successes (missiles that hit the target) divided by the total number of trials (missiles fired). In this case, all four missiles hit the targets, so the sample proportion is 4/4 = 1.

Next, we use the formula for calculating a confidence interval for a proportion:

p ± zα/2 * √(p(1-p)/n)

where p is the sample proportion, zα/2 is the critical value from the standard normal distribution corresponding to the desired level of confidence (in this case, 95%), and n is the sample size.

Since we are looking for a lower confidence interval, we can use a one-sided normal distribution instead of a two-sided distribution. In this case, the critical value is -1.645, which we can find using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator.

Plugging in the values, we get:

1 - 1.645 * √((1*0)/4) ≤ p ≤ 1

Simplifying the expression, we get:

0 ≤ p ≤ 1

To know more about confidence interval here

https://brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ4

Answer:

15×(-1)^10 -2*(-1)-3 = 14