Herman Wouk, a Jewish-American author and World War II veteran believed that Jews could be loyal to both religious law and the law of the land by recognizing the validity and importance of each system of law and finding ways to reconcile any potential conflicts between them.
In his book "This is My God", Wouk argued that Judaism has a long tradition of respecting secular authority and the laws of the countries where Jews live. He noted that the Talmud, a central text of Jewish law, contains many passages that affirm the importance of obeying the laws of the land, so long as they do not conflict with Jewish religious principles.
At the same time, Wouk acknowledged that Jewish law, or halakhah, is essential to Jewish identity and practice. He believed that Jews could reconcile these two systems of law by striving to obey both and by recognizing that the laws of the land and Jewish law are not necessarily in opposition.
To learn more about Jewish-Americans, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9990053
#SPJ4
The intentional tort of assault requires that:a. there be physical contact with the bodyb. the injured party have knowledge of the dangerc. the injured party be detained against his or her will d. the defendant intended to injure the plaintiffe. all of the other choices
Assault is an intentional tort that involves causing another person to have a reasonable apprehension or fear of imminent harmful or offensive contact. It does not require actual physical contact with the body, but rather the perception of an imminent threat of contact.
For example, if a person raises their hand to strike someone, but does not actually make physical contact, they may still be liable for assault.
In addition to the requirement of reasonable apprehension or fear, the injured party must also have knowledge of the danger. This means that they must be aware of the threat of harmful or offensive contact. If they are not aware of the danger, they cannot be said to have suffered an assault.
The other choices listed in the question are incorrect. Physical contact with the body is not necessary for assault, nor is detention against one's will. While the defendant may intend to injure the plaintiff in an assault case, intent alone is not sufficient to establish liability. Rather, the defendant must have intended to cause the plaintiff to have a reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact.
To know more about offensive contact visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31486668
#SPJ11
L.B. Sullivan won his libel lawsuit at trial and at the Alabama Supreme Court level. What was his award?
L.B. Sullivan won his libel lawsuit at the trial court level and at the Alabama Supreme Court level. At trial, Sullivan was awarded $500,000 in damages, a substantial amount at the time.
The correct answer is $500,000.
However, the New York Times appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, which ultimately ruled in favour of the newspaper. In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment of the United States Constitution did not protect the publication of false statements about public officials unless those statements were made with "actual malice"—that is, with the knowledge that they were false or with reckless disregard for whether they were true or false.
Because the statements in the case were not made with actual malice, the Supreme Court overturned Sullivan's libel verdict and damages award. As a result, Sullivan did not ultimately receive any damages from the New York Times in connection with the lawsuit.
To learn more about Alabama, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10241194
#SPJ4
what sectors do griffiths and kennedy argue judges are biast against
Justice Thomas Griffith and Justice Kennedy argued that judges in the United States are biased against the business sector because they believe judges are more likely to rule against businesses than against other types of litigants.
The correct answer is business sector.
They claim this bias is particularly pronounced in employment discrimination, environmental regulation, and securities litigation cases. According to their argument, judges are more sympathetic to individuals or groups who they perceive to be victims of corporate wrongdoing and are, therefore, more likely to rule against businesses in cases where they are accused of such wrongdoing.
Additionally, they argue that judges may have a bias against businesses because they perceive corporations as having more excellent resources and, therefore, more remarkable ability to defend themselves in court. However, their arguments have been criticised and controversial, with some legal scholars and practitioners arguing that judges are biased in favour of corporations and the wealthy.
To know more about Justice Kennedy, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11031375
#SPJ4
fill in the blank. "Recent research suggests that ________ has/have contributed to the large drop in fertility rates in Brazil over the past several decades.
A) legalization of abortions
B) AIDS and malaria
C) exposure to environmental estrogens
D) soap operas
E) laws preventing women from having more than one child"
D) soap operas
Recent research suggests that D) soap operas have contributed to the large drop in fertility rates in Brazil over the past several decades.
Why is this so ?This surprising finding was based on a study that found that women who were exposed to soap operas that portrayed smaller families were more likely to have fewer children themselves.
The researchers suggested that these soap operas, which are very popular in Brazil, may have played a role in shaping social norms and attitudes around family size and childbearing.
Find out more on fertility rates at https://brainly.com/question/5609618
#SPJ1
