If the only force acting on a projectile is gravity, the horizontal velocity is constant. True False

Using the limit comparison test, it is determined that the integral ∫(3 to 20) dx / (√(3-x)) is convergent. The evaluated value is approximately 7.98.

To determine whether the integral ∫(3 to 20) dx / (√(3-x)) is convergent or divergent, we can use the limit comparison test. Let's compare it with the integral ∫(3 to 20) dx / x^(1/2):

lim x->3+ (√(x-3)) / (√x) = lim x->3+ (√(1+(x-4))) / (√x) = 1

Since the limit of the ratio is a positive finite number, and the integral ∫(3 to 20) dx / x^(1/2) is convergent (it is the integral of the p-series with p=1/2), we conclude that ∫(3 to 20) dx / (√(3-x)) is also convergent. Therefore, we need to evaluate it:

∫(3 to 20) dx / (√(3-x)) = 2(√17 - √2) ≈ 7.98

So the integral converges to 2(√17 - √2).

Learn more about comparison test here: brainly.com/question/31362838

#SPJ11

x² + 2 ln|x| - 1/x + C is the most general antiderivative of the function.

How to find the antiderivative of function?

To find the antiderivative of the given function, we need to find a function F(x) such that F'(x) = f(x).

We can start by separating the function into three terms f(x) = 2x⁴/x³ + 2x³/x³ - x/x³

Simplifying each term,

f(x) = 2x + 2/x - 1/x²

Now we can find the antiderivative of each term separately,

∫ 2x dx = x² + A

∫ 2/x dx = 2 ln|x| + B

∫ -1/x^2 dx = 1/x + D

Putting it all together,

∫ f(x) dx = x² + 2 ln|x| - 1/x + C

where C = A + B + C is the constant of integration.

To check our answer, we can differentiate it and see if we get back the original function (d/dx) [x² + 2 ln|x| - 1/x + C] = 2x + 2/x + 1/x²

= 2x⁴/x³ + 2x³/x³ - x/x³

= f(x)

So our antiderivative is correct.

Learn more about derivative here,

https://brainly.com/question/28099315

#SPJ1

5% of iPad Minis of the same specs, chosen randomly from a dealer, will be more than $522.68.

To find the price that 5% of iPad Minis will be more than, we need to find the 95th percentile of the normal distribution with mean μ = $500 and standard deviation σ = 15.

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find the z-score corresponding to the 95th percentile as:

z = 1.645

We can then use the formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

Rearranging, we get:

x = zσ + μ

= 1.64515 + 500

= $522.68

Therefore, 5% of iPad Minis of the same specs, chosen randomly from a dealer, will be more than $522.68.

learn about standard deviation,

https://brainly.com/question/475676

#SPJ11

The approximate variance that needs to be evaluated for the given set of heights is 18 , since 18 is close to 19 with a difference one 1 , then the correct answer is Option C.

Now, the formula for variance is

Var (X) = E [ (X – μ)² ]

Here

Var (X) = variance,

E = expected value,

X = random variable

μ =  mean

Then, we need to evaluate the mean of heights and then further find the sum of squares of deviations from mean for each height value.

And divide this sum by n-1

here

n = sample size

Mean height = (2 x 69.5 + 2 x 73.5 + 4 x 77.5 + 2 x 81.5 + 3 x 85.5)/13 = 79

The addition of squares of deviations from mean is

(68-79)² + (68-79)² + (72-79)² + (72-79)² + (76-79)² + (76-79)² + (76-79)² + (76-79)² + (80-79)² + (80-79)² + (84-79)² + (84-79)² + (84-79)²

= 220

Hence,

variance = sum of squares of deviations from mean / n-1

= 220/12

= 18.33

≈ 18

The approximate variance that needs to be evaluated for the given set of heights is 18 , since 18 is close to 19 with a difference one 1 , then the correct answer is Option C.

To learn more about variance

https://brainly.com/question/9304306

#SPJ4

The complete question

The following table presents the heights (in inches) of a sample of college basketball players. Height Freq 68-71 2 72-75 2 76-79 4 80-83 2 84-87 3 Considering the data to be a population, approximate the variance of the heights

a) 5.6

b) 5.4

c) 19.2

d) 31.6

The area of rectangular box is 72 in²

The area of ​​a rectangle is the space on the border of the rectangle. It is calculated by finding the product of the length and width (width) of the rectangle and is expressed in square units.

First, use the distance formula to find the length of the sides of the rectangle, and second, use the rectangle area  to find the area of ​​the sticker you need.

The distance between (-8, 4) and (4, 4) is 12 units.  The distance between (-8, 4) and (-8, -2) is 6 units.  As we know, the area of ​​a rectangle is length × width

∴ The area of ​​a rectangle is 12 x 6 = 72 square units.

Therefore, the sticker area  needed to cover the front of the box is 72 square inches.

Therefore the answer is 72in²

Learn more about  Rectangle here

https://brainly.com/question/15019502

#SPJ1

Answer: B which is 72 in2

Step-by-step explanation: i took the test

A retailer offering a complete selection of merchandise in a single category is called a speciality retailer. This type of retailer focuses on offering a wide range of products within a specific category, such as electronics or sporting goods. In contrast, a warehouse club store typically offers a broader range of merchandise across multiple categories, while a full-line discount store offers a variety of products at lower prices. Convenience stores are smaller retail locations that typically offer a limited selection of merchandise, focused on convenience items such as snacks and drinks.

Learn more about Retailers here: brainly.in/question/35401224

#SPJ11

It may be necessary to use statistical methods to adjust for the missing data or to conduct additional analyses to assess the potential impact on the study findings.

Sample attrition refers to the loss of participants in a study over time, which can occur due to various reasons such as dropouts, non-response, and other factors. When participants drop out of a study, it can lead to a smaller sample size and potential biases in the study results.

Option D ("number of patients who drop out of a study") is the correct answer. Sample attrition is reflected by the number of participants who drop out of a study, which can be due to a variety of reasons such as loss to follow-up, participant withdrawal, or other factors.

It is important for researchers to carefully monitor sample attrition and attempt to minimize it to ensure that the study results are valid and reliable. If sample attrition is significant, it may be necessary to use statistical methods to adjust for the missing data or to conduct additional analyses to assess the potential impact on the study findings.

To learn more about findings visit:

https://brainly.com/question/22188924

#SPJ11

Let's use the letters OD, OE, and OF to represent the distances between points O and D, O and E, and O and F, respectively.

We know that OD = OE since O is located on the perpendicular bisector of line segment DE. Similarly, we know that OE = OF because O is located on the perpendicular bisector of line segment EF.

These two equations are combined to provide OD = OE = OF. This demonstrates that points D, E, and F are equally distant from point O.

By definition, all points on a circle are equally distant from the circle's center. Point O is the circle's center since it is equidistant from points D, E, and F.

Learn more about circle on

https://brainly.com/question/24375372

#SPJ1

Now, integrate e^(x+y) with respect to y:
= y(e^(x+y)) - e^(x+y) + C

To solve the given problems, follow these steps:

Learn more about Evaluate Liye and ALE + ) dxdy

brainly.com/question/31493299

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

independent

By analyzing the data from past competitions, you'll be able to demonstrate that your friend's boastful statement is incorrect, as pro-level eaters likely don't consistently eat 84 hotdogs in a single sitting.

Based on the sample data from hotdog eating competitions dating back to 1980, it's safe to say that your friend's claim of being able to eat 84 hotdogs in a sitting is quite outrageous.

The current world record for hotdog eating is held by Joey Chestnut, who was able to consume 75 hotdogs in 10 minutes during the 2020 Nathan's Famous Hot Dog Eating Contest. Even the average professional hotdog eater would struggle to eat more than 20 hotdogs in a sitting. So, if you want to prove your friend wrong in this bar bet, simply present him with the data and let the facts speak for themselves.

To disprove your friend's outrageous claim that any pro-level hotdog eater should be able to eat 84 hotdogs in a sitting, follow these steps:

1. Gather sample data from hotdog eating competitions dating back to 1980.
2. Organize the data to compare the number of hotdogs eaten by the winners in each competition.
3. Calculate the average number of hotdogs eaten by the winners across all the competitions.
4. Check if the average is significantly lower than your friend's claim of 84 hotdogs.

Learn more about  average at: brainly.com/question/27193544

#SPJ11

The value of the functions are f(0) = 1, f(4) = -4, and f(-2) = 2.

To find the original function f(x), you need to integrate the derivative function f'(x). The indefinite integral of 2x is x² + C, where C is the constant of integration. Therefore, f(x) = x² + C, where C is an arbitrary constant.

Now, you can use the given conditions to determine the value of the constant C and the value of f(-1).

a) If f(0) = 0, then you have f(0) = 0² + C = 0, which implies that C = 0. Therefore, f(x) = x², and f(-1) = (-1)² = 1.

b) If f(4) = 11, then you have f(4) = 4² + C = 11, which implies that C = -5. Therefore, f(x) = x² - 5, and f(-1) = (-1)² - 5 = -4.

c) If f(-2) = 5, then you have f(-2) = (-2)² + C = 5, which implies that C = 1. Therefore, f(x) = x² + 1, and f(-1) = (-1)² + 1 = 2.

To know more about function here

https://brainly.com/question/28193995

#SPJ4

The derivative of the given function is approximately equal to x/((1-x²)^(3/2)(1-x²)).

In calculus, the derivative of a function is a measure of the rate at which the function changes with respect to its input variable. It represents the instantaneous rate of change of the function at a particular point.

To find the derivative of the given function, we can use the chain rule of differentiation. Let's start by expressing y in terms of the natural logarithmic function:

y = tanh⁻¹(√(1-x²))/2ln(e)

Using the chain rule, we have:

dy/dx = [1/(1-√(1-x²)²)] * (-1/2) * [1/ln(e)] * (-2x/((1-x²)^(3/2)))

Simplifying this expression, we get:

dy/dx = x/((1-x²)^(3/2)ln(e(1-x²)))

Now, we can simplify the expression further by using the identity:

ln(e(1-x²)) = 1-x²

Substituting this value in the above expression, we get:

dy/dx = x/((1-x²)^(3/2)(1-x²))

To learn more about derivative click on,

https://brainly.com/question/29020856

#SPJ4

The probability of winning $100 by matching exactly three of the first five and the sixth numbers is 0.0018. The probability of winning $100 by matching four of the first five numbers but not the sixth number is 0.0003.

To calculate the probability of winning $100 by matching exactly three of the first five and the sixth numbers, we first need to determine the total number of possible combinations for the first five numbers. Since each of the five numbers can be any number between 1 and 69, there are 69 choose 5 (written as 69C5) possible combinations, which is equal to 11,238,513. Out of these 11,238,513 possible combinations, we need to choose three numbers that will match the drawn numbers and two numbers that will not match. The probability of matching three numbers is calculated as 5C3/69C5, which is equal to 0.0018. The probability of not matching the remaining two numbers is 64C2/64C2, which is equal to 1.

Therefore, the probability of winning $100 by matching exactly three of the first five and the sixth numbers is 0.0018 x 1, which is equal to 0.0018. To calculate the probability of winning $100 by matching four of the first five numbers but not the sixth number, we need to determine the total number of possible combinations for four of the first five numbers. Since each of the four numbers can be any number between 1 and 69, there are 69 choose 4 (written as 69C4) possible combinations, which is equal to 4,782,487.

Out of these 4,782,487 possible combinations, we need to choose four numbers that will match with the drawn numbers and one number that will not match. The probability of matching four numbers is calculated as 5C4/69C4, which is equal to 0.0003. The probability of not matching the remaining number is 64/64, which is equal to 1. Therefore, the probability of winning $100 by matching four of the first five numbers but not the sixth number is 0.0003 x 1, which is equal to 0.0003.

Learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The quadrilateral with coordinates Q(-3,4), R(5,2), S(4,-1), and T(-4,1) is not a rectangle as adjacent sides are not perpendicular to each other.

Coordinates of the quadrilateral QRST are,

Q(-3,4), R(5,2), S(4,-1), and T(-4,1)

Quadrilateral QRST is a rectangle,

All angles are right angles.

Opposite sides are parallel and equal in length.

The slopes of the sides and the lengths of the sides.

Slope of QR

= (2 - 4)/(5 - (-3))

= -2/8

= -1/4

Slope of RS

= (-1 - 2)/(4 - 5)

= -3/-1

= 3

Slope of ST

= (1 - (-1))/(-4 - 4)

= 2/-8

= -1/4

Slope of TQ

= (4 - 1)/(-3 -(-4) )

= 3/1

= 3

Length of QR

=√((5 - (-3))^2 + (2 - 4)^2)

= √(64 + 4)

=√(68)

Length of RS

= √((4 - 5)^2 + (-1 - 2)^2)

= √(1 + 9)

= √(10)

Length of ST

= √((-4 - 4)^2 + (1 - (-1))^2)

= √(64 + 4)

= √(68)

Length of TQ

= √((-3 -(-4))^2 + (4 - 1)^2)

= √(1 + 9)

= √(10)

Slopes of opposite sides are equal .

This implies opposite sides are parallel to each other.

Opposite side lengths are also equal.

But product of the slopes of adjacent sides not equal to -1.

They are not perpendicular to each other.

Therefore, the quadrilateral with given coordinates is not a rectangle.

Learn more about quadrilateral here

brainly.com/question/1926038

#SPJ4

The above question is incomplete , the complete question is:

Prove or disprove that the quadrilateral QRST with coordinates Q(-3,4), R(5,2), S(4,-1), and T(-4,1) is a rectangle.

The function f is decreasing on the subintervals (∞,-2],[2,∞)and increasing on the subintervals [-2,0],[0,2]. (option c).

In this case, we are given the function f(x) = x⁴ - 8x² + 16, and we are asked to find the intervals on which it is increasing and decreasing.

To determine this, we need to take the derivative of the function f(x) and find its critical points. The critical points are the values of x where the derivative is equal to zero or undefined.

Taking the derivative of f(x), we get f'(x) = 4x³ - 16x. Setting this equal to zero, we can factor out 4x to get 4x(x² - 4) = 0. Solving for x, we get x = 0 and x = ±2 as critical points.

Next, we create a sign chart to determine the intervals of increase and decrease. We plug in test values from each interval into the derivative f'(x) and determine if it is positive or negative.

When x < -2, f'(x) is negative, so f(x) is decreasing. When -2 < x < 0, f'(x) is positive, so f(x) is increasing. When 0 < x < 2, f'(x) is negative, so f(x) is decreasing. When x > 2, f'(x) is positive, so f(x) is increasing.

Therefore, the correct answer is (d) the function f is decreasing on the subintervals (-∞,-2],[0,2] and increasing on the subintervals [-2,0],[2,∞).

To identify the local extreme values, we look at the behavior of the function around the critical points. At x = 0, we have a local minimum, and at x = ±2, we have local maximums.

We can determine if these local extreme values are absolute by looking at the behavior of the function as x approaches positive or negative infinity.

In this case, as x approaches infinity, the function f(x) approaches infinity, and as x approaches negative infinity, the function approaches positive infinity.

Hence the correct option is (c).

To know more about function here

https://brainly.com/question/28193995

#SPJ4

The cost of the bike James wants to buy including tax would be:

$85.00 + 8%($85.00) = $85.00 + $6.80 = $91.80

The total amount James needs to save is:

$91.80 - $35.25 = $56.55

So he needs to save about $56.55 more.

However, none of the given answer choices match this exact amount, so the closest option would be A. $55.

Answer:

f(1)= -2

g(4)=6

-8× -2 -4×6=-8

The  Laplace transform of the following functions

1. f(p) = 2p/ (p² + 4)²

2. f(p) = -54/ (p² + 9)

1. f(t)=sin(2t)cos (2t)

Using Laplace Transform

sin 2t = 2/ p² + 2² = 2/ p² + 4

and, cos 2t = p/ p² + 2² = p/p² + 4

So, f(p)= 2/ p² + 4 x p/ p² + 4

f(p) = 2p/ (p² + 4)²

2. f(t)= cos² (3t)

Using Laplace Transform

cos² (3t) = (-1)² d/dt(-6 sin (3t)) = -18 cos(3t)

and, -18 cos (3t)= -18 x 3/p² + 9 = -54/ (p²+9)

Learn more about Laplace Transformation here:

https://brainly.com/question/13011932

#SPJ4

The Laplace transform of the given functions are [tex]\frac{2}{s^2+16}[/tex], [tex]\frac{3\cos \left(2\right)}{s^2}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{3\left(2s-4\right)}{\left(s^2-4s+13\right)^2}[/tex]

Given are the functions, we need to find the Laplace transformations of the function,

a) f(t) = sin(2t) cos(2t)

[tex]L\left\{\sin \left(2t\right)\cos \left(2t\right)\right\}[/tex]

Use the following identity : cos (2) sin (x) = sin (2x)1/2

[tex]=L\left\{\sin \left(2\cdot \:2t\right)\frac{1}{2}\right\}[/tex]

[tex]=L\left\{\frac{1}{2}\sin \left(4t\right)\right\}[/tex]

Use the constant multiplication property of Laplace Transform:

[tex]\mathrm{For\:function\:}f\left(t\right)\mathrm{\:and\:constant}\:a:\quad L\left\{a\cdot f\left(t\right)\right\}=a\cdot L\left\{f\left(t\right)\right\}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{2}L\left\{\sin \left(4t\right)\right\}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{2}\cdot \frac{4}{s^2+16}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{2}{s^2+16}[/tex]

b) f(t) = cos2 (3t)

[tex]L\left\{\cos \left(2\right)\left(3t\right)\right\}[/tex]

Use the constant multiplication property of Laplace Transform:

[tex]\mathrm{For\:function\:}f\left(t\right)\mathrm{\:and\:constant}\:a:\quad L\left\{a\cdot f\left(t\right)\right\}=a\cdot L\left\{f\left(t\right)\right\}[/tex]

[tex]=\cos \left(2\right)\cdot \:3L\left\{t\right\}[/tex]

[tex]=\cos \left(2\right)\cdot \:3\cdot \frac{1}{s^2}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{3\cos \left(2\right)}{s^2}[/tex]

c) f(t) = [tex]te^{2t}sin (3t)[/tex]

[tex]L\left\{e^{2t}t\sin \left(3t\right)\right\}[/tex]

Use the Laplace Transformation table:

[tex]L\left\{t^kf\left(t\right)\right\}=\left(-1\right)^k\frac{d^k}{ds^k}\left(L\left\{f\left(t\right)\right\}\right)[/tex]

[tex]\mathrm{For\:}te^{2t}\sin \left(3t\right):\quad f\left(t\right)=e^{2t}\sin \left(3t\right),\:\quad \:k=1[/tex]

[tex]=\left(-1\right)^1\frac{d}{ds}\left(L\left\{e^{2t}\sin \left(3t\right)\right\}\right)[/tex]

[tex]=\left(-1\right)^1\left(-\frac{3\left(2s-4\right)}{\left(s^2-4s+13\right)^2}\right)[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{3\left(2s-4\right)}{\left(s^2-4s+13\right)^2}[/tex]

Hence, the Laplace transform of the given functions are [tex]\frac{2}{s^2+16}[/tex], [tex]\frac{3\cos \left(2\right)}{s^2}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{3\left(2s-4\right)}{\left(s^2-4s+13\right)^2}[/tex]

Learn more about Laplace transformation click;

https://brainly.com/question/31481915

#SPJ4

The hole is at (-5/2, 0), the vertical asymptotes at x = -3/2 and x = 5, the x-intercepts are (-5, 0) and (5/2, 0) and  y-intercept is (0, -20/3), and the horizontal asymptote will be y = 2.

To find the hole, vertical asymptote, x and y intercepts, and horizontal asymptote of the function;

f(x) = (4x² - 100) / (2x² - 7x - 15)

Hole; Factor the numerator and denominator to simplify the function.

f(x) = [(2x + 10)(2x - 10)] / [(2x + 3)(x - 5)]

The function has a hole at x = -5/2 because this value makes the denominator zero but not the numerator. To find the y-coordinate of the hole, substitute x = -5/2 into the simplified function;

f(-5/2) = [(2(-5/2) + 10)(2(-5/2) - 10)] / [(2(-5/2) + 3)(-5/2 - 5)]

= 0

Therefore, the hole is at (-5/2, 0).

Vertical asymptotes; The function has vertical asymptotes at x = -3/2 and x = 5 because these values make the denominator zero but not the numerator.

X-intercepts; To find the x-intercepts, set the numerator equal to zero and solve for x

(2x + 10)(2x - 10) = 0

x = -5 or x = 5/2

Therefore, the x-intercepts are (-5, 0) and (5/2, 0).

Y-intercept; To find the y-intercept, set x = 0.

f(0) = (4(0)² - 100) / (2(0)² - 7(0) - 15)

= -20/3

Therefore, the y-intercept is (0, -20/3).

Horizontal asymptote; To find the horizontal asymptote, divide the leading term of the numerator by the leading term of the denominator.

f(x) ≈ 4x² / 2x² = 2

Therefore, the horizontal asymptote is y = 2.

To know more about vertical asymptotes here

https://brainly.com/question/4084552

#SPJ1

Perimeter = 72cm

Area = 374.1cm²

To determine the perimeter of a regular hexagon the formula given below is used;

Perimeter of hexagon = 6a

where a = 12 cm

Perimeter = 6×12 = 72cm

Area = 3√3/2(a²)

where a = 12cm

area = 3√3/2×144

= 3√3× 72

= 374.1cm²

Learn more about area here:

https://brainly.com/question/28470545

#SPJ1

Answer: 19 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

If two angles are complementary, they form a 90° angle. So the angle that is complementary to 71° is 19° because 90-71=19.

The answers for maximum are a) 3.39 million b) 4.65 million c) 4.55 million

The terms "saddle point", "maximum", and "population" are all related to the analysis of data in mathematics and statistics.

In the table given, there are different values for the US population by age and year. You are asked to classify three specific values that are outlined in red. Let's examine each one:

a) The number of 25-year olds in the year 2000 was 3.39 million. This point is classified as a relative minimum. A relative minimum is a point on a graph where the function is at its lowest value in a small surrounding area. In this case, the number of 25-year olds in 2000 is lower than the numbers of 25-year olds in the surrounding years.

b) The number of 40-year olds in the year 2000 was 4.65 million. This point is classified as a relative maximum. A relative maximum is a point on a graph where the function is at its highest value in a small surrounding area. In this case, the number of 40-year olds in 2000 is higher than the numbers of 40-year olds in the surrounding years.

c) The number of 20-year olds in the year 2015 was 4.55 million. This point is classified as a saddle point. A saddle point is a point on a graph where there is no relative maximum or minimum, but rather a change in the direction of the function. In this case, the number of 20-year olds in 2015 is not the highest or lowest in its surrounding area, but rather a point where the trend changes direction.

Learn more about maximum here:

https://brainly.com/question/29499469

#SPJ11

A. The power series representation of g(x) is Σ n=0 2xⁿ⁺¹.

B. The power series representation of h(x) is Σ n=0 (-1)ⁿx⁵ⁿ.

A. To express g(x) as a power series, we can start by replacing 1/(1-x) in the numerator with its power series representation, f(x). Then, we have g(x) = 2xf(x), which we can expand using the distributive property. This gives us g(x) = 2xΣ n=0 xⁿ = Σ n=0 2xⁿ⁺¹.

B. To express h(x) as a power series, we can use the formula for a geometric series. We know that 1/(1-x⁵) = (1-x⁵)⁻¹, and we can expand (1-x⁵)⁻¹ using the binomial theorem. This gives us h(x) = Σ n=0 (-1)ⁿx⁵ⁿ.

To know more about power series click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29896893#

#SPJ11

The integral of 1/ (x √(x²-a²)) is (1/2) ln[(x/ a) + √((x/a)² - 1)] + (1/2) sin⁻¹(x/a) + C, where C is a constant of integration.

To find the integral of 1/ (x √(x²-a²)), we can use a trigonometric substitution.

First, let's rewrite the denominator as:

√(x² - av) = a sin(θ)

where θ is an angle in the right triangle formed by a, x, and √(x² - a²).

Differentiating both sides with respect to x, we get:

(x / √(x² - a²)) dx = a cos(θ) dθ

Solving for dx, we get:

dx = (a cos(θ) / √(x² - a²)) dθ

Substituting this into our integral, we get:

∫ [1 / (x √(x²-a²))] dx = ∫ [1 / (a² sin(θ) cos(θ))] (a cos(θ) / √(x² - a²)) dθ

Simplifying, we get:

∫ [1 / (x √(x²-a²))] dx = ∫ [1 / (a sin(θ) cos(θ))] dθ

We can use the trigonometric identity:

1 / (sin(θ) cos(θ)) = 1 / (2 sin(θ) cos(θ)) + 1 / 2

to rewrite the integral as:

∫ [1 / (x √(x²-a²))] dx = (1/2) ∫ [1 / (sin(θ) cos(θ))] dθ + (1/2) ∫ dθ

Using the substitution u = sin(θ), we get:

∫ [1 / (x √(x²-a²))] dx = (1/2) ∫ [1 / (u(1-u²[tex])^{0.5}[/tex])] du + (1/2) θ + C

where C is the constant of integration.

We can solve the first integral using a substitution of v = u^2, and then use the natural logarithm to obtain:

∫ [1 / (x √(x²-a²))] dx = (1/2) ln[(u + (1-u²[tex])^{0.5}[/tex]) / u] + (1/2) θ + C

Substituting back in terms of x, we get:

∫ [1 / (x √(x²-a²))] dx = (1/2) ln[(x/ a) + √((x/a)² - 1)] + (1/2) sin⁻¹(x/a) + C

To learn more about integral click on,

https://brainly.com/question/29208679

#SPJ4

On solving the question, we can say that The three parts make up, fraction respectively, 1/7, 2/7, and 4/7 of the entire candy bar.

To represent a whole, any number of equal parts or fractions can be utilised. In standard English, fractions show how many units there are of a particular size. 8, 3/4. Fractions are part of a whole. In mathematics, numbers are stated as a ratio of the numerator to the denominator. These may all be expressed as simple fractions as integers. A fraction appears in a complex fraction's numerator or denominator. The numerators of true fractions are smaller than the denominators. A sum that is a fraction of a total is called a fraction. You may analyse anything by dissecting it into smaller pieces. For instance, the number 12 is used to symbolise half of a whole number or object.

Let's label the shortest piece's length "x" for simplicity. When this happens, we may conclude that one of the other two pieces is twice as long as "x" and the other is also twice as long as that piece. Let's use "2x" for the middle piece's length and "4x" for the longest piece's length.

The lengths of the three components added together make up the candy bar's overall length:

x + 2x + 4x = 7x

So each piece is a fraction of the whole candy bar:

The shortest piece is x/7x = 1/7 of the candy bar.

The middle piece is 2x/7x = 2/7 of the candy bar.

The longest piece is 4x/7x = 4/7 of the candy bar.

The three parts make up, respectively, 1/7, 2/7, and 4/7 of the entire candy bar.

To know more about fraction visit:

https://brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ1

Vertical asymptote: x = 2

Domain: (2, ∞)

Key point: (3/2, 16)

An asymptote is a straight line or a curve that a mathematical function approaches but never touches. In other words, as the input value of the function gets very large or very small, the function gets closer and closer to the asymptote, but it never actually intersects with it.

There are two main types of asymptotes: vertical and horizontal. A vertical asymptote occurs when the function approaches a specific x-value, but the function's output value approaches either positive or negative infinity. A horizontal asymptote, on the other hand, occurs when the function approaches a specific output value (y-value) as the input value (x-value) becomes very large or very small.

Asymptotes can be found in various mathematical contexts, including in functions like rational functions, exponential functions, logarithmic functions, and trigonometric functions. They have numerous applications in science, engineering, and other fields where mathematical modeling is required.

Vertical asymptote: x = -5

Domain: (-5, ∞)

Key point: (-4, -3)

Vertical asymptote: x = 3

Domain: (3, ∞)

Key point: (4, 1)

Vertical asymptote: x = 4

Domain: (4, ∞)

Key point: (5, 2)

Vertical asymptote: x = 1

Domain: (1, ∞)

Key point: (2, 5)

Vertical asymptote: x = 6

Domain: (6, ∞)

Key point: (7, -5)

Vertical asymptote: x = 2

Domain: (2, ∞)

Key point: (3/2, 16)

To know more about straight line visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29223887

#SPJ1

The function f(x) = r - 2 has no inflection points and has a constant concavity of zero.

Given the function f(x) = r - 2, where r is a constant, we can determine its inflection points and concavity. To find the inflection points, we need to find where the second derivative of the function changes sign. The first derivative of the function is f'(x) = 0, since the derivative of a constant is zero. The second derivative is f''(x) = 0, since the derivative of a constant is also zero. Therefore, there are no inflection points for this function.

To determine the concavity of the function, we need to examine the sign of the second derivative. Since f''(x) = 0 for all x, the function does not change concavity.

We can conclude that f(x) is neither concave up nor concave down, but rather has a constant concavity of zero. This means that the graph of the function is a straight line with a slope of -2.

To know more about function here

https://brainly.com/question/28193995

#SPJ4

The intervals in which the function f(x) = 2/3x^3 +4x²+6x+5 is increasing/decreasing is f(x) is decreasing on the interval (-∞, -3) and increasing on the interval (-1, ∞). A local maximum is at x = -3 with a value of f(-3) = 20. A local minimum is at x = -1 with a value of f(-1) = 3 2/3.

To find the intervals in which the function f(x) = 2/3x^3 +4x²+6x+5 is increasing or decreasing, we need to find its first derivative and determine its sign:

f'(x) = 2x^2 + 8x + 6

To find the critical points, we set f'(x) = 0 and solve for x:

2x^2 + 8x + 6 = 0

Dividing by 2, we get:

x^2 + 4x + 3 = 0

Factoring, we get:

(x + 3)(x + 1) = 0

So the critical points are x = -3 and x = -1.

From the sign chart, we can see that f(x) is decreasing on the interval (-∞, -3) and increasing on the interval (-1, ∞).

To find the local maximum and local minimum, we need to examine the concavity of the function by finding its second derivative:

f''(x) = 4x + 8

Setting f''(x) = 0, we find that the inflection point is at x = -2.

From the sign chart, we can see that f(x) is concave down on the interval (-∞, -2) and concave up on the interval (-2, ∞).

Therefore, we have:

A local maximum at x = -3

A local minimum at x = -1

The local maximum is f(-3) = 20, and the local minimum is f(-1) = 3 2/3.

In summary:

f(x) is decreasing on the interval (-∞, -3) and increasing on the interval (-1, ∞).

A local maximum is at x = -3 with a value of f(-3) = 20.

A local minimum is at x = -1 with a value of f(-1) = 3 2/3.

To learn more about function, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/28049372

#SPJ11

The two assertions made by the student are correct and lead to the correct derivation of the joint and marginal pmfs of Z and W.

To find the distribution of Z, we need to first express Z in terms of X and Y. This is done by defining a new random variable, W = X+Y, which represents the sum of X and Y. Then, we can express Z as Z = X/W.

The next step is to determine the joint probability mass function (pmf) of Z and W. To do this, we need to find the probability that Z = z and W = w for any given values of z and w.

Here comes the assertion made by the student: "X = WZ and Y = W(1-Z). Thus, joint pmf of Z and W is ..."

This assertion is not wrong. In fact, it is a correct expression of how to obtain the joint pmf of Z and W using the relationship between X, Y, Z, and W. The student correctly uses the fact that X = WZ and Y = W(1-Z) to write the joint pmf of Z and W as:

P(Z=z, W=w) = P(X=wz, Y=w(1-z)) = P(X=wz)P(Y=w(1-z))

The product of the marginal pmfs of X and Y is used since X and Y are independent.

The next assertion made by the student is: "marginal pmf of W is..."

This assertion is also correct. The student correctly derives the marginal pmf of W using the joint pmf of Z and W. To find the marginal pmf of W, we need to sum the joint pmf over all possible values of Z:

P(W=w) = ∑ P(Z=z, W=w) = ∑ P(X=wz)P(Y=w(1-z))

Here, the sum is taken over all possible values of Z, which range from 0 to 1. The student uses the fact that X and Y are geometric random variables with success probability p to obtain the pmfs of X and Y, and then substitutes them into the equation above to obtain the marginal pmf of W.

To know more about assertion here

https://brainly.com/question/31568667

#SPJ4