The amount of gasoline purchased per car at a large service station is normally distributed with the mean of $47 and a standard deviation of $5. A random sample of 47 is selected, describe the sampling distribution for the sample mean.

The value of the standardized test statistic is approximately 1.7442.

To find the value of the standardized test statistic, we need to calculate the z-score, which measures how many standard deviations the sample proportion is away from the hypothesized proportion.

The formula for the z-score is:

z = (p' - p) / √(p(1-p)/n)

Where:

p' is the sample proportion (number of successes / sample size)

p is the hypothesized proportion

n is the sample size

In this case, p' = 78/100 = 0.78 (number of successes is 78 and sample size is 100), p = 0.70, and n = 100.

Substituting these values into the formula, we have:

z = (0.78 - 0.70) / √(0.70(1-0.70)/100)

Calculating further:

z = 0.08 / √(0.70(0.30)/100)

z = 0.08 / √(0.21/100)

z = 0.08 / √0.0021

z ≈ 0.08 / 0.0458258

z ≈ 1.7442

So, the value of the standardized test statistic is approximately 1.7442.

Learn more about standardized test statistic click;

https://brainly.com/question/31975254

#SPJ12

The system of linear inequalities represented by the graphs are:  1.6x+2y≤0 and 3x +-2y≤0

You should recall that an inequality is a relationship between two expressions or values that are not equal to each other.

In order to determine the shaded part in an algebraic form of an inequality, like y > 3x + 1, you need to determine if substituting (x, y) into the inequality yields a true statement or a false statement. A true statement means that the ordered pair is a solution to the inequality and the point will be plotted within the shaded region

From the graph the line cuts the x and y axes at 0.6 and 2 for the first line and the region shaded is up

In the second graph the line cuts x and y at 3 and -2 respectively

This gives rise to the solution that the origin is not included Therefore the inequalities formed are 1.6x+2y≤0 and 3x +-2y≤0 respectively

Learn more about an inequality on https://brainly.com/question/30228778

#SPJ1

The poll's results indicated that approximately 8.5% of individuals between the ages of eight and eighteen could be classified as video game addicts.

This percentage suggests that a significant number of young people are struggling with excessive video game use, which can have negative consequences for their mental and physical health, academic performance, and social relationships.

It's important to note that not all video game use is harmful or addictive. Many individuals enjoy playing video games in moderation, and some even use them as a way to connect with friends and family or improve their cognitive skills.

According to the pie chart the resulting percentage is 8.5%.

However, excessive video game use can lead to addiction, which can be challenging to overcome.

To know more about percentage here

https://brainly.com/question/13729841

#SPJ4

The probability that the random variable Y lies between 0 and 2 is approximately 0.744.

To find the probability that Y lies between 0 and 2, we need to integrate the joint probability density function (PDF) of X and Y over the range of Y from 0 to 2, while keeping X within its valid range of 0 to infinity:

PO = ∫[0,2]∫[0,∞] fxy(x,y) dx dy

Substituting the given PDF of fxy(x,y) and performing the integration, we get:

PO = ∫[0,2]∫[0,∞] 1/20 * exp(-x/2) * exp(-y/3) dx dy
= ∫[0,2] (1/20 * exp(-y/3) * [-2*exp(-x/2)]|[0,∞]) dy
= ∫[0,2] (1/10 * exp(-y/3)) dy
= [-3 * exp(-y/3)]|[0,2]
= 3 * (1 - exp(-2/3))

Therefore, the probability that the random variable Y lies between 0 and 2 is approximately 0.744.

Learn more about integration here:
https://brainly.com/question/14502499

#SPJ11

Use u-substitution with u=2-x to get F(x)=-[2/3(2-x)³-1/4(2-x)⁴]+C, where C is the constant of integration.

To see as the antiderivative of f(x) = x(2-x)², we can utilize joining by replacement.

Let u = 2-x, then du/dx = - 1. Reworking, we get dx = - du. Subbing these qualities, we have:

∫x(2-x)² dx = - ∫(2-u)u² du

= -∫(2u² - u³) du

= -[2/3 u³ - 1/4 u⁴] + C

= -[2/3 (2-x)³ - 1/4 (2-x)⁴] + C

In this way, the antiderivative of f(x) will be F(x) = - [2/3 (2-x)³ - 1/4 (2-x)⁴] + C, where C is the steady of joining.

To check our response, we can separate F(x) and check whether we return to the first capability f(x). Taking the subsidiary of F(x), we have:

dF/dx = - d/dx [2/3 (2-x)³ - 1/4 (2-x)⁴]

= -[-2(2-x)² + (2-x)³]

= (2-x)²(3-x)

We can see that dF/dx does to be sure rise to f(x) = x(2-x)², so our antiderivative is right.

To learn more about antiderivative, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/14011803

#SPJ4

The total volume of the solid can be found by integrating the volume of each washer from t to 4 with respect to y, using the formula is  π(1²-(1+x)²)(4-t) dy.

To find the volume of the solid generated by revolving the same region around the line x=-1, we will use the washer method.

We will slice the region into infinitesimally thin washers perpendicular to the line x=-1. The inner radius of each washer will be equal to 1+x, and its outer radius will be equal to 1. The height of each washer will be the difference between the upper and lower bounds of the region, which is 4-t. Hence, the volume of each washer will be π(1²-(1+x)²)(4-t).

Finally, to find the volume of the solid generated by revolving the same region around the line y=5, we will use a combination of the disk and washer methods.

We will slice the region into infinitesimally thin disks and washers perpendicular to the line y=5.

To know more about integral here

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ4

When one cup has a diameter of 4 inches, and a height of 8 inches, the water of cup that Anthony must scoop out of the sink with this cup to empty it is 10 cups.

When one cup has a diameter of 8 inches, and a height of 8 inches, the water of cup that Anthony must scoop out of the sink with this cup to empty it is 3 cups.

In Mathematics and Geometry, the volume of a cylinder can be calculated by using the following formula:

Volume of a cylinder, V = πr²h

Where:

Since one cup has a diameter of 4 inches, and a height of 8 inches, the water of cup that Anthony must scoop out of the sink with this cup to empty it can be calculated as follows;

Number of cups = [Volume of half-sphere]/Volume of cylinder

Number of cups = 1000/[3.14 × (4/2)² × 8]

Number of cups = 9.95 ≈ 10 cups.

When the cup has a diameter of 8 inches, and a height of 8 inches, the water of cup that Anthony must scoop out of the sink with this cup to empty it can be calculated as follows;

Number of cups = 1000/[3.14 × (8/2)² × 8]

Number of cups = 2.5 ≈ 3 cups.

Read more on cups and diameter here: https://brainly.com/question/14939293

#SPJ1

Complete Question:

Anthony has a sink that is shaped like a half-sphere. The sink has a volume of 1000 in³. One day, his sink clogged. He has to use one of two cylindrical cups to scoop the water out of the sink. The sink is completely full when Anthony begins scooping.

(a) One cup has a diameter of 4 in. and a height of 8 in. How many cups of water must Anthony scoop out of the sink with this cup to empty it? Round the number of scoops to the nearest whole number.

(b) One cup has a diameter of 8 in. and a height of 8 in. How many cups of water must he scoop out of the sink with this cup to empty it? Round the number of scoops to the nearest whole number.

The given differential equation is a second-order homogeneous linear equation with constant coefficients.

Its characteristic equation is r² + 25 = 0, which has roots r = ±5i. Therefore, the general solution is y(x) = c1cos(5x) + c2sin(5x), where c1 and c2 are constants to be determined by the initial conditions.

To find c1 and c2, we use the initial values y(0) = 2 and y'(0) = -2. Substituting x = 0 in the general solution, we get y(0) = c1cos(0) + c2sin(0) = c1, which must equal 2.

Taking the derivative of y(x), we get y'(x) = -5c1sin(5x) + 5c2cos(5x). Substituting x = 0, we get y'(0) = 5c2, which must equal -2. Solving for c1 and c2, we get c1 = 2 and c2 = -2/5. Therefore, the solution of the initial value problem is y(x) = 2cos(5x) - (2/5)sin(5x).

In summary, the given differential equation y" + 25y = 0 has a general solution of y(x) = c1cos(5x) + c2sin(5x). To determine the constants c1 and c2, we use the initial values y(0) = 2 and y'(0) = -2, which lead to c1 = 2 and c2 = -2/5. Hence, the solution of the initial value problem is y(x) = 2cos(5x) - (2/5)sin(5x).

To know more about differential equation click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31583235#

#SPJ11

If f is odd function, g be an even function and g(x)=f(x+5) then f(x−5) equals f(x+5).

Since g(x) = f(x+5) and g(x) is even, we have:

g(-x) = g(x)

f(-x+5) = g(-x) (Substitute x+5 for x in g(x) = f(x+5))

f(-x+5) = g(x) (Since g(x) = g(-x) for even functions)

f(x+5) = g(x) (Replace -x with x in f(-x+5) = g(x))

f(x+5) = f(x+5) (Since g(x) = f(x+5))

Therefore, f(x+5) = g(x) = g(-x) = f(x-5) (Since g is even and f is odd).

So, f(x-5) = f(x+5).

To learn more about function, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ11

The area of the plane that satisfies the equation 2x + 3y + 6z - 9 = 0 and lies in the first octant is 6.75 square units.

To begin finding the area, we first need to determine the equation of the plane in standard form, which is Ax + By + Cz + D = 0. We can do this by rearranging the given equation:

2x + 3y + 6z - 9 = 0

2x + 3y + 6z = 9

Divide both sides by 3 to get the standard form:

(2/3)x + y + (2/3)z - 3 = 0

(2/3)x + y + (2/3)z = 3

Now that we have the equation in standard form, we can identify the values of A, B, C, and D:

A = 2/3

B = 1

C = 2/3

D = -3

Next, we need to find the intercepts of the plane with the x, y, and z axes. To find the x-intercept, we set y and z to zero and solve for x:

(2/3)x + 0 + (2/3)(0) = 3

(2/3)x = 3

x = 4.5

So the x-intercept is (4.5, 0, 0). Similarly, we can find the y-intercept by setting x and z to zero:

(2/3)(0) + y + (2/3)(0) = 3

y = 3

So the y-intercept is (0, 3, 0). Finally, we can find the z-intercept by setting x and y to zero:

(2/3)(0) + 0 + (2/3)z = 3

z = 4.5

So the z-intercept is (0, 0, 4.5).

Now that we have the intercepts, we can draw a triangle connecting them in the first octant. This triangle represents the portion of the plane that lies in the first octant.

To find the area of this triangle, we can use the formula for the area of a triangle:

Area = (1/2) x base x height

where the base and height are the lengths of two sides of the triangle. We can use the distance formula to find the lengths of these sides:

Base = √[(4.5 - 0)² + (0 - 0)² + (0 - 0)²] = 4.5

Height = √[(0 - 0)² + (3 - 0)² + (0 - 0)²] = 3

Therefore, the area of the triangle (and hence the area of the plane) is:

Area = (1/2) x base x height = (1/2) x 4.5 x 3 = 6.75

To know more about area here

https://brainly.com/question/14994710

#SPJ4

Answer:

[tex]6x^{4}[/tex] - [tex]5x^{3}[/tex] + [tex]4x^{2}[/tex] + 11x - 4

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation must be FOILed (Basically, multiply every term in the first part of the equation by every term in the second part.)

First, we multiply [tex]2x^{2}[/tex] by [tex]3x^{2}[/tex], 2x, and -1

[tex]2x^{2}[/tex] * [tex]3x^{2}[/tex] = [tex]6x^{4}[/tex]

[tex]2x^{2}[/tex] * 2x = [tex]4x^{3}[/tex]

[tex]2x^{2}[/tex] * -1 = - [tex]2x^{2}[/tex]

Then, we multiply -3x by [tex]3x^{2}[/tex], 2x, and -1

-3x *  [tex]3x^{2}[/tex] = [tex]-9x^{3}[/tex]

-3x * 2x = [tex]-6x^{2}[/tex]

-3x * -1 = 3x

Then, we multiply 4 by [tex]3x^{2}[/tex], 2x, and -1

4 *  [tex]3x^{2}[/tex] = [tex]12x^{2}[/tex]

4 * 2x = 8x

4 * -1 = -4

Finally, we add all these terms together.

 [tex]6x^{4}[/tex] + [tex]4x^{3}[/tex] - [tex]2x^{2}[/tex] - [tex]9x^{3}[/tex] - [tex]6x^{2}[/tex] + 3x + [tex]12x^{2}[/tex] + 8x - 4

Combining like terms, we will get a final answer of

[tex]6x^{4}[/tex] - [tex]5x^{3}[/tex] + [tex]4x^{2}[/tex] + 11x - 4

Answer:

28.75 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

1.) 5 3/4 x 5/1 = 28 3/4

2.) 28 3/4 simplified is 28.75

Hope that helps!

The equilibrium solution is P(t) = K.

The statement is true.

The logistic model ODE is given by dP/dt = kP(1-P/K), where P(t) is the population at time t, k is a constant that represents the growth rate, and K is the carrying capacity of the environment.

To solve this ODE, we can separate the variables and integrate both sides:

1/(P(K-P)) dP/dt = k dt

Integrating both sides gives:

ln|P/(K-P)| = kt + C

where C is the constant of integration.

We can then rearrange the equation to solve for P in terms of t:

[tex]P/(K-P) = e^{(kt+C)} = Ae^{(kt)[/tex]

where A is the constant of integration obtained by exponentiating the constant of integration, C.

Multiplying both sides by K-P gives:

P = K/[tex](1+Ae^{(-kt)})[/tex]

We can rewrite this as:

[tex]P = K/(1+Ae^(-kt)) * (Ae^(kt))/(Ae^(kt))[/tex]

[tex]P = K * Ae^(kt) / (1+Ae^(kt))[/tex]

This can be further simplified by setting A = (P0/K - 1), where P0 is the initial population at time t=0:

[tex]P = K * (P0/K - 1) * e^(kt) / (1 - (P0/K - 1) * e^(kt))[/tex]

Simplifying this expression gives:

P = K / (1 + (1/K - P0/K) * [tex]e^{(-kt))[/tex]

This is the logistic equation in the form [tex]P(t) = K/(1+Be^(-kt))[/tex], where B is a constant.

At equilibrium, when dP/dt = 0, we have P(t) = K. This is also a solution to the logistic equation, which can be obtained by setting B = 0.

Therefore, the general solution to the logistic equation is:

[tex]P(t) = K / (1 + (1/K - P0/K) * e^(-kt)) = K / (1 + Ae^(-kt))[/tex]

where A = (P0/K - 1) and P0 is the initial population at time t=0. The equilibrium solution is P(t) = K.

To learn more about Integrating visit:

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

For independent events A and B, where P(A) = 0.3 and P(B) = 0.4, the conditional probability P(B | A) = 0.4

Even A and B are independent events.

P(A) = 0.3 and P(B) = 0.4

Therefore,

P( A∩B ) = P(A) · P(B)

= (0.3)*(0.4)

= 0.12

By the formula of calculating conditional probability we get,

P(B | A) = P( B∩A ) / P(A)

= P( A∩B )/ P(A)

= 0.12/ 0.3

= 12/30

= 0.4

Thus the probability that event B occurs given that event A occurred is 0.4

Conditional probability is referred to the likelihood of an event to occur given that the other event occurs too.

To know more about conditional probability here

https://brainly.com/question/30144287

#SPJ4

Answer:y=x/4

Step-by-step explanation:y=x/4

The statement, "Colbert "Real-Estate" Agency's number of home showings by its agents is same "each-day" of week, then variable for number of showings, is a continuous distribution" is False, because it represents a discrete distribution.

If the Colbert "Real-Estate" Agency has determined the number of "home-showings" by their agents is "same" each day of week, then variable "number of showings" is not a continuous distribution. Rather, it is a discrete distribution,

where the values can take on only  finite number of values. In this case, the number of home showings can only be a whole number, such as 0, 1, 2, 3, etc.

A continuous distribution is the one where the possible values of the variable are not restricted to any particular set of numbers, and can include any value in a given range.

An example of a continuous distribution would be the height of adult humans, where any real number between 0 and infinity is a possible value.

Therefore, the statement is False.

Learn more about Distribution here

https://brainly.com/question/30032500

#SPJ4

(a) The derivative value of h′(2) = -35

(b) The derivative value of h′(2) = 8

(c) The derivative value of h′(2) = (-32/16) - (20/16) = -3/2

(d) The derivative value of h′(2) = (2)(-3)(4) + (2)(-3)(-4) + (2)(-2)(4) = -8

(e) The derivative value of h′(2) = (-1)(7)/(2+(-3))² = -7/25

(f) The derivative value of h′(2) = (3/2)(1/2)(7) = 21/4

(g) The derivative value of h′(2) = f′(2g(2))g′(2) = f′(8)(7) = 14

(a) Using the linear properties of the derivative, h′(2) = 5f′(2) - 4g′(2) = -35.

(b) Using the product rule, h′(2) = f′(2)g(2) + f(2)g′(2) = (2)(4) + (-3)(7) = 8.

(c) Using the quotient rule, h′(2) = (g(2)f′(2) - f(2)g′(2)) / g(2)² = (-32/16) - (20/16) = -3/2.

(d) Using the product rule and the chain rule, h′(2) = g(2)f(2) + 2g(2)f′(2) = (-3)(4) + 2(4)(-2) = -8.

(e) Using the quotient rule and the chain rule, h′(2) = -g(2)/(2+(-3))² = -7/25.

(f) Using the chain rule, h′(2) = (1/2)(4 + 3√g(2))g′(2) = (3/2)(1/2)(7) = 21/4.

(g) Using the chain rule, h′(2) = f′(2g(2))g′(2) = f′(8)(7) = 14.

To know more about derivative click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/25324584#

#SPJ11

To find the local linearization (L(x)) of f(x) = x^2 at x = -6, we need to determine the function's value and slope at that point =  L(x) = 36 - 12(x + 6)

To find the local linearization of f(x) = x^2 at -6, we need to use the formula:

l_a(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x-a)

First, we need to find the value of f(-6):

f(-6) = (-6)^2 = 36

Next, we need to find the value of f'(x), which is the derivative of f(x) with respect to x:

f'(x) = 2x

Now we can find the value of f'(-6):

f'(-6) = 2(-6) = -12

Finally, we can plug in the values we found into the formula to get the local linearization:

l_6(x) = 36 - 12(x + 6) = -12x + 84

Therefore, the local linearization of f(x) = x^2 at -6 is l_6(x) = -12x + 84.
To find the local linearization (L(x)) of f(x) = x^2 at x = -6, we need to determine the function's value and slope at that point.

1. Find the value of f(-6): f(-6) = (-6)^2 = 36

2. Compute the derivative of f(x): f'(x) = 2x

3. Find the slope at x = -6: f'(-6) = 2(-6) = -12

Now, we can use the point-slope form of the equation for the linearization:

L(x) = f(-6) + f'(-6)(x - (-6))

L(x) = 36 - 12(x + 6)

L(x) = 36 - 12(x + 6)

To learn more about linearization, click here:

brainly.com/question/20286983

#SPJ11

Complete question: Find the local linearization of f(x)=x² at 6.l₆ (x)

The interval of heights representing the middle 95% of males' peaks from this school is 63 to 73 inches.

Define Height.

Height is the measurement of someone's or something's height, typically taken from the bottom up to the highest point. Commonly, it is stated in length units like feet, inches, meters, or centimeters.

What is the empirical rule?

The empirical rule, also known as the 68-95-99.7 rule, is a statistical guideline frequently used, presuming that the data is usually distributed, to estimate the percentage of values in a dataset that falls within a particular range.

According to the empirical rule, commonly referred to as the 68-95-99.7 rule, for a normal distribution:

Nearly 68% of the data are within one standard deviation of the mean.

The data are within two standard deviations of the mean in over 95% of the cases.

The data are 99.7% of the time within three standard deviations of the norm.

In this instance, we're looking for the height range corresponding to the center 95% of male heights at this school. As a result, we must identify the height range within two standard deviations of the mean.

As a result, we can determine the bottom and upper boundaries of the height range using the standard distribution formula as follows:

Lower bound = Mean - 2 * Standard deviation

= 68 - 2 * 2.5

= 63

Upper bound = Mean + 2 * Standard deviation

= 68 + 2 * 2.5

= 73

Therefore, the interval of heights that represents the middle 95% of male heights from this school is 63 to 73 inches.

Learn more about Heights from the given link.

https://brainly.com/question/28122539

#SPJ1

Fundamental Theorem of Differentiation value of g'(x) when g(x) = Sx 0 √6-5t²dt is -x / (6 - x²) + ∫[0 to √6-x²] x / [tex](6 - t^2)^{(3/2)}[/tex] dt.

To determine g'(x), we need to find the derivative of g(x) with respect to x.

g(x) = ∫[0 to √6-x²] √(6 - t²) dt

Let's use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus to differentiate g(x):

g'(x) = d/dx [∫[0 to √6-x²] √(6 - t²) dt]

Using the Chain Rule, we can write:

g'(x) = (√(6 - x²))' × √(6 - x²)' - 0

Now, we need to find the derivatives of √(6 - x²) and √(6 - x²)':

√(6 - x²)' = -x / √(6 - x²)

√(6 - x²)" = [tex]-(x^2 + 6 - x^2)^{(-3/2)}[/tex] * (-2x)

Simplifying, we get:

√(6 - x²)' = -x / √(6 - x²)

√(6 - x²)" = x / [tex](6 - t^2)^{(3/2)}[/tex]

Substituting these values, we get:

g'(x) = [(-x / √(6 - x²)) × √(6 - x²)] - ∫[0 to √6-x²] × / [tex](6 - t^2)^{(3/2)}[/tex] dt

Simplifying, we get:

g'(x) = -x / (6 - x²) + ∫[0 to √6-x²] × / [tex](6 - t^2)^{(3/2)}[/tex] dt

Therefore, g'(x) = -x / (6 - x²) + ∫[0 to √6-x²] × / [tex](6 - t^2)^{(3/2)}[/tex] dt.

Learn more about the differentiation at

https://brainly.com/question/24898810

#SPJ4

The mean of this probability distribution is 1.55.

To find the mean of a probability distribution, we need to multiply each possible value by its corresponding probability, and then add up these products. So, the mean is:

mean = (0)(0.19) + (1)(0.37) + (2)(0.16) + (3)(0.26) + (4)(0.02)
    = 0 + 0.37 + 0.32 + 0.78 + 0.08
    = 1.55

Therefore, the mean of this probability distribution is 1.55.

To learn more about probability here:

brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

To conduct a one-way ANOVA, we need to test the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference between the means of the three groups on the intelligence test.

We can use the following steps:

Step 1: Calculate the mean score for each group.

Mean score for Very Social group = (9+12+8+9+7)/5 = 9

Mean score for Average group = (10+7+6+9+8)/5 = 8

Mean score for Nonsocial group = (6+7+7+5+5)/5 = 6

Step 2: Calculate the sum of squares within (SSW).

SSW = Σ(Xi-Xbari)², where Xi is the score of the ith dog in the ith group, and Xbari is the mean score of the ith group.

SSW = (9-9)² + (12-9)² + (8-9)² + (9-9)² + (7-9)² + (10-8)² + (7-8)² + (6-8)² + (9-8)² + (8-8)² + (6-6)² + (7-6)² + (7-6)² + (5-6)² + (5-6)²

SSW = 42

Step 3: Calculate the sum of squares between (SSB).

SSB = Σni(Xbari-Xbar)², where ni is the sample size of the ith group, Xbari is the mean score of the ith group, and Xbar is the overall mean score.

Xbar = (9+8+6)/3 = 7.67

SSB = 5(9-7.67)² + 5(8-7.67)² + 5(6-7.67)²

SSB = 15.47

Step 4: Calculate the degrees of freedom.

Degrees of freedom within (dfW) = N-k, where N is the total sample size and k is the number of groups.

dfW = 15-3 = 12

Degrees of freedom between (dfB) = k-1 = 2

Step 5: Calculate the mean squares within (MSW) and between (MSB).

MSW = SSW/dfW = 42/12 = 3.5

MSB = SSB/dfB = 15.47/2 = 7.73

Step 6: Calculate the F-ratio.

F = MSB/MSW = 7.73/3.5 = 2.21

Step 7: Determine the critical value and compare to the F-ratio.

Using a significance level of .05 and degrees of freedom of 2 and 12, the critical value for F is 3.89.

Since 2.21 < 3.89, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, we can conclude that there is no significant difference between the means of the three groups on the intelligence test.

learn about hypothesis,

https://brainly.com/question/15980493

#SPJ11

The probability that at least 9 presentations result in sales is the sum of all these probabilities: P(X ≥ 9) = 0.9392 + 0.8749 + 0.7911 + … + 0 ≈ 0.8732

We can use the normal approximation formula for the Binomial distribution, which states:

μ = np
σ = √(npq)

where n is the number of trials, p is the probability of success, q is the probability of failure (q = 1 - p), μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

In this case, n = 60, p = 0.2, and q = 0.8. Therefore:

μ = np = 60 x 0.2 = 12
σ = √(npq) = √(60 x 0.2 x 0.8) = 2.19

To find the probability that at least 9 presentations result in sales, we need to find the probability of getting 9, 10, 11, ..., 60 sales, and add them up. However, since the normal distribution is continuous, we need to use a continuity correction by subtracting 0.5 from the lower limit and adding 0.5 to the upper limit. This is because the probability of getting exactly 9 (or any other integer) sales is zero, but we want to include the probability of getting between 8.5 and 9.5 sales.

Therefore, the probability that at least 9 presentations result in sales is:

P(X ≥ 9) = P(Z ≥ (8.5 - 12) / 2.19) = P(Z ≥ -1.56) = 0.9392

Similarly, we can find the probability of getting at least 10, 11, …, 60 sales:

P(X ≥ 10) = P(Z ≥ (9.5 - 12) / 2.19) = P(Z ≥ -1.13) = 0.8749
P(X ≥ 11) = P(Z ≥ (10.5 - 12) / 2.19) = P(Z ≥ -0.81) = 0.7911
…  
P(X ≥ 60) = P(Z ≥ (59.5 - 12) / 2.19) = P(Z ≥ 20.29) ≈ 0

The probability that at least 9 presentations result in sales is the sum of all these probabilities:

P(X ≥ 9) = 0.9392 + 0.8749 + 0.7911 + … + 0 ≈ 0.8732

Therefore, the answer is e. 0.8732.

To learn more about probability here:

brainly.com/question/30034780#

#SPJ11

We can conclude that the probability is more than 50% that the project would need more than the given deadline to complete.

more than 50%

To solve the problem, we can use the standardized normal distribution. The mean of the project finish time is 25 weeks, and the standard deviation is the square root of the variance, which is 3 weeks. We can standardize the deadline by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard deviation:

z = (11 - 25) / 3 = -4

The probability that the project would need more than 11 weeks to complete is the same as the probability of getting a z-score less than -4, which is very low. We can use a standard normal distribution table or calculator to find this probability, which is approximately 0.00003 or 0.003%. Therefore, we can conclude that the probability is more than 50% that the project would need more than the given deadline to complete.

To learn more about distribution visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29062095

#SPJ11

a) 3x + 40C = 4(x + 40)

b) The domain is x >= 0.

c) This expression approaches 60/13, or approximately 46.2%.

(a) We know that the amount of brine in the final mixture is the sum of

the amount of brine in the initial solution and the amount of brine added,

and the total volume of the final mixture is the sum of the initial volume

and the volume added. Therefore,

Amount of brine in final mixture = 0.25(40) + 0.75x

Total volume of final mixture = 40 + x

The concentration of brine in the final mixture is the ratio of the amount

of brine to the total volume of the final mixture. Therefore,

C = (0.25(40) + 0.75x)/(40 + x)

Multiplying numerator and denominator by 4, we get:

4C = (40 + 3x)/ (40 + x)

Simplifying and rearranging, we get:

3x + 40C = 4(x + 40)

(b) The domain of the function is the set of all possible values of x that

make physical sense. Since we cannot add a negative volume of the

75% brine solution, the domain is x >= 0.

(c) The graph of the function is shown below. As the tank is filled, the

rate at which the concentration of brine increases slows down.

As x approaches infinity, the concentration of brine approaches 60%. To

see this, note that as x gets very large, the additional volume of the 75%

brine solution becomes negligible compared to the initial volume of the

tank.

Therefore, the concentration of brine approaches the concentration of

the initial solution, which is 0.25(40)/1000 = 1/25 = 0.04, or 4%. However,

as x approaches infinity, the concentration of brine approaches the

concentration of the 75% brine solution, which is 0.75.

Therefore, the concentration of brine appears to approach the weighted

average of these two concentrations, which is:

0.04(1 - 3x/(40 + 3x)) + 0.75(3x/(40 + 3x))

Simplifying, we get:

(30x + 1600)/(40 + 3x)

As x approaches infinity, this expression approaches 60/13, or

approximately 46.2%.

for such more question on domain

https://brainly.com/question/16444481

#SPJ11

The correct list that shows the numbers in order from smallest to largest is 0.38, 0.43, 0.472, 0.616. So, the correct answer is B).

The correct order of the numbers from smallest to largest is 0.38, 0.43, 0.472, 0.616. This can be determined by comparing each pair of numbers and placing them in the correct order based on their value.

The first two numbers, 0.38 and 0.43, are already in the correct order. Next, we compare 0.43 and 0.472, and since 0.43 is smaller than 0.472, we place 0.472 after 0.43.

Finally, we compare 0.472 and 0.616, and since 0.472 is smaller than 0.616, we place 0.616 at the end. So, the correct answer is B).

To know more about order of the numbers:

https://brainly.com/question/20681445

#SPJ4

The 90% confidence interval for the true population mean textbook weight is (74.58, 81.42) ounces.

To construct a confidence interval for the true population mean textbook weight, we will use the formula:
[tex]CI = \bar x \± Z\alpha/2 * (\sigma/√n)[/tex]
[tex]\bar x[/tex] is the sample mean (which is 78 ounces),[tex]Z\alpha /2[/tex] is the critical value of the standard normal distribution for a 90% confidence interval (which can be found using a Z-table or calculator and is approximately 1.645), σ is the population standard deviation (which is 10.5 ounces), and n is the sample size (which is 33 textbooks).
Substituting these values into the formula, we get:
[tex]CI = 78 \± 1.645 \times (10.5/\sqrt33)[/tex]
Simplifying this expression, we get:
[tex]CI = 78 \± 3.42[/tex]
90% confident that the true population mean textbook weight falls within this interval.

In other words, if we were to take many random samples of 33 textbooks and construct a 90% confidence interval for each one, about 90% of those intervals would contain the true population mean.

For similar questions on population

https://brainly.com/question/25630111

#SPJ11

V(4X) = 64, where X has a discrete uniform distribution on the integers 2 to 5.

We ought to discover the 4X likelihood mass function. We know that the conceivable values ​​for X are 2, 3, 4, and 5, so the conceivable values ​​for 4X are 8, 12, 16, and 20. 

The probability that X takes one of these values ​​is 1/4 since X is a number between 2 and 5 and contains a discrete uniform conveyance.

 So the probability mass function for 4X is

P(4X = 8) = P(X = 2) = 1/4

P(4X = 12) = P(X = 3) = 1/4

P(4X = 16) = P(X = 4) = 1/4

P(4X = 20) = P(X = 5) = 1/4

Now we can use the formula for the variance of a discrete random variable.

[tex]V(4X) = E[(4X)^2] - [E(4X)]^2[/tex]

where E represents the expected value.

To find E(4X), we can use the linearity of expectation.

E(4X) = 4E(X)

Since X has a discrete uniform distribution over the integers 2 to 5, its expected value is

E(X) = (2+3+4+5)/4 = 3.5

So E(4X) = 4(3,5) = 14. To find[tex]E[(4X)^2][/tex], we need to use the 4X probability mass function.

[tex]E[(4X)^2] = (8^2)(1/4) + (12^2)(1/4) + (16^2)(1/4) + (20^2)(1/ Four)[/tex]

= 260

Now we can substitute these values ​​into the formula for V(4X).

[tex]V(4X) = E[(4X)^2] - [E(4X)]^2[/tex]

[tex]= 260 - 14^2[/tex]

= 260 - 196

= 64

Therefore V(4X) = 64.

learn more about probability 

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ4

Here, x = 2 is a vertical asymptote of the function.

Now, For find the vertical asymptotes of the function g(x) = ln(x) / (x - 2), we need to see where the denominator of the fraction is equal to zero, since division by zero is undefined.

Thus, Putting x - 2= 0,

we get, x = 2.

Therefore, x = 2 is a vertical asymptote of the function.

And, We also need to check if there are any other vertical asymptotes.

To do this, we need to check for any values of x that make the numerator of the fraction equal to zero while the denominator is not equal to zero.

However, the numerator ln(x) is never zero for positive values of x, so there are no other vertical asymptotes for this function.

Thus,  x = 2 is a vertical asymptote of the function.

Learn more about the function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ4

In order to determine whether the Weibull distribution or another distribution might be a better fit for the lifespan of these battery packs, it would be important to analyze the data and compare the goodness-of-fit statistics for different distributions.

What is probability?

Probability is a measure of the likelihood of an event occurring. It is a number between 0 and 1, where 0 means the event is impossible and 1 means the event is certain to happen.

The normal distribution is a very common and useful distribution for modeling many real-world phenomena, including the lifespan of battery packs. However, there are certain situations where other distributions may be more appropriate.

One example of a distribution that could potentially be a better fit for the lifespan of these battery packs is the Weibull distribution. The Weibull distribution is often used to model the failure rates of components, including batteries. It has a flexible shape that can be adjusted to fit different types of failure patterns, and it can handle both increasing and decreasing failure rates.

In order to determine whether the Weibull distribution or another distribution might be a better fit for the lifespan of these battery packs, it would be important to analyze the data and compare the goodness-of-fit statistics for different distributions. This could involve using statistical software to fit various distributions to the data and comparing the resulting fit statistics, such as the Akaike information criterion (AIC) or the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), to determine which distribution provides the best fit.

To learn more about probability from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ1