Socialization is the process through which individuals learn and internalize the norms, values, beliefs, and behaviors of their culture. It is a lifelong process that begins in infancy and continues throughout an individual's life.
There are several main agents of socialization, including family, peers, schools, media, and religion. These agents play a critical role in shaping an individual's identity, worldview, and behavior. For example, the family is often the primary agent of socialization in early childhood, as parents and siblings teach children basic skills, values, and beliefs. Peers become more influential during adolescence, as young people begin to seek acceptance and validation from their peers. Schools provide formal education and socialization, while media and religion can also shape attitudes, beliefs, and behavior.
Socialization is important for humans because it enables us to function effectively in society and to interact with others in meaningful ways. It helps us to understand and navigate social roles, norms, and expectations. Socialization also helps to create a sense of belonging and identity, and it allows us to transmit cultural knowledge and traditions from one generation to the next.
One way that my family helped to socialize me to my culture's norms and values was by emphasizing the importance of respect for elders. From a young age, I was taught to address adults with titles of respect, such as "sir" or "ma'am," and to defer to their authority. This was reinforced through consistent modeling by my parents and other adults in my family, and it became an internalized value for me as I grew older. I learned that showing respect to elders was not only expected, but it was also a way of showing gratitude and appreciation for their wisdom and experience. This value has stayed with me throughout my life and has influenced the way that I interact with others in a respectful and courteous manner.
~~~Harsha~~~
produce a report to explain the relationship between the Schneider family and the inhabitants of Le Creusot in order to understand why some Creusotins wanted to change the name of their town and why others did not want to
Explanation:
The Schneider family has a long and complicated history with the town of Le Creusot. The family was instrumental in the development and growth of the town, starting with the establishment of the Schneider et Cie ironworks in the early 19th century. The company grew rapidly, becoming one of the largest industrial conglomerates of its time and employing a significant portion of the local population.
The Schneider family also played an important role in shaping the social and cultural fabric of the town. They were major patrons of the arts and sciences, founding schools, libraries, and museums in Le Creusot.
However, the Schneider family's legacy is also fraught with controversy. The company's success was built on the backs of thousands of workers who often labored in dangerous and unhealthy conditions, leading to numerous accidents and deaths. The Schneiders were known to be harsh and authoritarian employers, and their treatment of workers led to multiple strikes and protests throughout the years.
Moreover, during World War II, the Schneider family's relationship with the occupying Nazi forces has come under scrutiny. Some members of the family collaborated with the Germans, while others were involved in resistance movements.
In recent years, the Schneider family has made efforts to acknowledge and address their complicated history. In 2015, the Schneider Foundation established the Museum of the Industrial Revolution in Le Creusot, which includes exhibits on the history of the Schneider et Cie company and its impact on the town and its people. The museum also includes information on the Schneider family's involvement in World War II, including a section on their collaboration with the Nazis and their contributions to the resistance efforts.
In addition, the Schneider family has been involved in philanthropic efforts, including supporting education and cultural initiatives in Le Creusot and beyond. They have also pledged to improve working conditions and safety measures in their businesses, and have implemented training programs for their employees.
However, the Schneider family's legacy remains complex, and their role in the industrialization of France and their treatment of workers continue to be topics of debate and analysis. The Museum of the Industrial Revolution in Le Creusot and other initiatives may serve as a starting point for a more nuanced understanding of the Schneider family's history and impact on French society.
4 (30 points)
Who was John Brown and what did he do? Do you think his actions were justified?
Why or why not?
John Brown was an abolitionist who believed that slavery was an evil institution and that it was his moral duty to fight against it. He is most famous for his 1859 raid on the federal armory at Harpers Ferry, Virginia, where he and a small group of followers attempted to start a slave rebellion. The raid was quickly suppressed by federal troops, and Brown was captured, tried for treason, and executed.
Brown's actions were controversial and remain a subject of debate. Some argue that he was a hero who stood up against the brutal and unjust practice of slavery, while others view him as a dangerous fanatic who used violence and terrorism to advance his cause.
While it is true that slavery was a grave injustice and a stain on American history, Brown's actions cannot be justified. His use of violence and armed insurrection was not only illegal but also counterproductive, as it only served to increase tensions between the North and South and make compromise more difficult.
Moreover, Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry was a strategic blunder that was doomed to fail from the outset. He had little support from the local population, and his plan to start a slave rebellion was based on a flawed understanding of the conditions and attitudes of enslaved people. Instead of advancing the cause of abolition, Brown's actions only served to further polarize the nation and make a peaceful resolution of the slavery question more difficult.
In summary, while John Brown's intentions may have been noble, his use of violence and terrorism cannot be justified, and his actions were ultimately counterproductive to the cause of abolition.
Pro choice in Texas debate give four reasons to support
Pro-choice advocates in the Texas believe that individuals should have the right to choose whether or not to have an abortion.
What are advocates?Advocates are individuals or organizations who support a particular cause or group, and work to promote and defend their interests. Advocates can be found in a variety of contexts, including legal, social, and political arenas. They may use a range of strategies to advance their cause, such as lobbying lawmakers, organizing protests, or using social media to raise awareness. Advocates may also provide support and resources to individuals affected by the issue they are advocating for. Some examples of advocacy include disability rights advocacy, environmental advocacy, and animal rights advocacy. Advocates play an important role in raising awareness and promoting positive change, and their efforts can lead to significant improvements in the lives of those they represent.
The four reasons are:
1) Autonomy: Pro-choice supporters believe in individual autonomy, or the right of an individual to make decisions about their own body and health care without government interference.
2) Privacy: Supporters of pro-choice believe that individuals have the right to privacy when making decisions about their own reproductive health, and that the government should not be involved in these personal decisions.
3) Equality: Pro-choice supporters argue that restrictions on abortion access disproportionately affect marginalized communities, and that everyone should have equal access to reproductive health care.
4) Safety: Advocates for pro-choice argue that restrictions on abortion access can make the procedure less safe and increase the risk of complications for individuals seeking abortions.
To learn more about advocacy, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31346785
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Pro-choice in Texas debate give four reasons to support?
5. A political partnership of three people
A.
Triumvirate
B. The Triangle
C. Republic
D. Oligarchy
Which of the following is not true about the removal of the chair canyons from their homelands and south east?
Answer:
None because it makes no sense
.
Explanation:
What was the difference in the role of the Gestapo and the role of the SS during the Final Solution?
Answer:
During the Final Solution, which was the Nazi plan to exterminate Jews and other minority groups in Europe during World War II, the Gestapo and the SS played different roles.
The Gestapo, or Geheime Staatspolizei, was the secret police force of Nazi Germany. Their role was primarily focused on suppressing dissent and enforcing Nazi ideology within Germany and occupied territories. They were responsible for identifying and arresting political opponents, suspected spies, and other perceived threats to the Nazi regime. However, they did not have a direct role in the implementation of the Final Solution.
The SS, or Schutzstaffel, on the other hand, was a paramilitary organization that was responsible for implementing the Final Solution. The SS had several branches, including the Einsatzgruppen, who were mobile killing units responsible for carrying out mass executions of Jews and other minority groups in occupied territories. The SS also oversaw the operation of concentration camps, where prisoners were systematically worked to death, subjected to medical experiments, or killed in gas chambers.
Overall, while both the Gestapo and the SS were instrumental in carrying out the goals of the Nazi regime, their roles during the Final Solution were distinct. The Gestapo focused on suppressing dissent and enforcing Nazi ideology, while the SS was responsible for implementing the systematic extermination of Jews and other minority groups
HELP THIS IS URGENT PLS!!
1. Why do colonies become victims of colonization?
2. How did the Crusades boost the interest of European countries on the goods and products coming from the East?
Answer:
Colonies often become victims of colonization due to various factors such as military conquest, economic exploitation, and cultural dominance. Historically, powerful nations have sought to expand their empires by colonizing weaker nations, often using force and coercion to gain control of their lands and resources. This process was driven by a desire for power, wealth, and prestige, which often led to the subjugation and oppression of colonized peoples.
The Crusades played a significant role in boosting European interest in the goods and products coming from the East. During the Crusades, European armies traveled to the Holy Land and came into contact with Arab and Byzantine traders, who introduced them to a variety of exotic goods such as spices, silk, and perfumes. These goods were highly valued in Europe and became symbols of wealth and status. As a result, European merchants began to search for new trade routes to the East in order to obtain these goods directly, leading to the development of European trade networks with Asia and the Middle East. This expansion of trade helped to fuel the growth of European economies and led to the development of new technologies and innovations.
how does mercantilism differ from capitalism, or the free enterprise system?
People have access to a broader variety of reasonably priced goods because to capitalism's free-trade framework. Mercantilism, however, places restrictions on imports and the range of choices available to consumers. Fewer imports lead to less competition and more expensive prices.
What separates industrial capitalism from mercantile capitalism?The main contrast between capitalism and mercantilism is the role of the government. Although mercantilism requires government control, capitalism usually functions without it.Capitalism views wealth production as the key to economic advancement, in contrast to mercantilism, which claims that economic success may be obtained by the exploitation of wealth. A capitalist society promotes a competitive economic environment, whereas mercantilism is more favorable to monopolies.The process of amassing riches under mercantilism is designed to promote economic growth. Capitalism depends on the freedom of the person to engage in economic activities or render services in order to make money.Learn more about Mercantilism: https://brainly.com/question/25281918
#SPJ1
Technological advancement can come from improved devices or new
Answer here
what does a bitter toil mean
Answer:
The better toil shall not be lost, The rebel thought unbowed.The sister of misfortune
Explanation:
Answer: example "The smallest atom of truth represents someone's bitter toil and agony
Explanation:
Which option best describes a factor that contributed to the Great Recession?
• A. Increased income inequality as a result of tax cuts
• B. Improvements to Medicare with the passage of the MMA
• C. Low unemployment rates as new businesses started
• D. A stable stock market with responsible investor behaviors
The option that best describes a factor that contributed to the Great Recession is A. Increased income inequality as a result of tax cuts.
What was a Great recession?The Great Recession was a severe economic downturn that began in 2008 and lasted for several years.
It was caused by increasing income inequality and a decrease in demand for goods and services. The housing market collapse and the decrease in consumer spending also contributed to the recession.
Therefore, option A. Increased income inequality as a result of tax cuts best describes a factor that contributed to the Great Recession
learn more about Great recession: https://brainly.com/question/12878456
#SPJ1
In September of 1939, what did Reich Security Office order their men to do concerning Polish Jews?
A.
round up Jews in the countryside and transport them to the city
B.
shoot any Jewish person they see on sight
C.
deport any Polish Jews to the Soviet side of Poland
D.
free them from the ghettos and allow them to return home
In September of 1939, the Reich Security Office ordered their men to round up Jews in the countryside and transport them to the city. So, the correct answer is:
A. round up Jews in the countryside and transport them to the city
In a paragraph, describe the foreign and domestic policies during John F.
Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter's
presidencies (Pick TWO Presidents and Compare & Contrast their domestic AND
foreign policies).
Your answer
During John F. Kennedy's presidency, his domestic policies were focused on economic growth and the civil rights movement. Kennedy introduced the New Frontier program, which aimed to boost economic growth through tax cuts, increased government spending, and investments in education and technology. He also supported the civil rights movement and proposed several legislative measures to address racial discrimination, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
In terms of foreign policy, Kennedy is best known for his handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis and his efforts to contain Soviet influence around the world. He established the Peace Corps to promote American ideals abroad and introduced the Alliance for Progress program to improve relations with Latin America.
During Lyndon B. Johnson's presidency, his domestic policies were focused on the Great Society program, which aimed to eliminate poverty and racial injustice in America. He introduced several legislative measures to achieve this goal, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the creation of Medicare and Medicaid.
In terms of foreign policy, Johnson inherited the Vietnam War and escalated American involvement in the conflict. He also continued Kennedy's policy of containment, but with a greater focus on military intervention. Johnson's foreign policy was heavily criticized, both for the war in Vietnam and for his handling of Cold War tensions with the Soviet Union.
Overall, while both Kennedy and Johnson were committed to promoting economic growth and civil rights domestically, their approaches to foreign policy differed significantly. Kennedy focused on containing Soviet influence and promoting American ideals abroad, while Johnson's foreign policy was dominated by the Vietnam War and a more aggressive stance towards the Soviet Union.
~~~Harsha~~~
In "The Outsiders," the theme of self-sacrifice and honor emphasizes the importance of courage and moral responsibility, challenging readers to consider what they would be willing to sacrifice for the greater good through the actions of its characters.
It is true that the theme of self-sacrifice and honor In "The Outsiders" emphasizes the importance of courage and moral responsibility.
Does "The Outsiders" emphasize self-sacrifice and honor?The novel explores theme of self-sacrifice and honor through the actions of its characters and tells the story of two rival gangs which are the Greasers and the Socs and their conflicts.
The main character is named Greaser, who learns the importance of self-sacrifice and honor through the experiences of his friends and family. This act of self-sacrifice demonstrates his moral responsibility and courage.
Full question "In "The Outsiders," the theme of self-sacrifice and honor emphasizes the importance of courage and moral responsibility, challenging readers to consider what they would be willing to sacrifice for the greater good through the actions of its characters. True/False"
Read more about The Outsiders
brainly.com/question/24817486
#SPJ1
PLEASE HELP DUE TODAY
What is cited as the reason behind Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. being elected the youngest president of the Montgomery Improvement Association?
A) his successful orchestration of the Montgomery Bus Boycott
B) his theological background as a pastor
C) the example he set during the Birmingham Campaign
D) his moving and iconic "I Have A Dream" speech
Answer:
Option A) his successful orchestration of the Montgomery Bus Boycott is cited as the reason behind Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. being elected the youngest president of the Montgomery Improvement Association.
Explanation:
Option A) This is because it was a very recognizable thing he did just in Montgomery and it helped imporve.
5. How was Jimmy Carter similar to Woodrow Wilson?
They both wanted to end communism through negotiation.
b.
They both sought to use moral principles to guide U.S. foreign policy.
c. They both believed that the Panama Canal should be given back to Panama.
d. They both felt that refugees should be accepted into the country without
question.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. They both sought to use moral principles to guide U.S. foreign policy. Both Jimmy Carter and Woodrow Wilson were presidents who believed in using moral principles to guide U.S. foreign policy. Wilson believed in the principle of self-determination, which argued that nations should have the right to determine their own destiny. Carter similarly believed in promoting human rights and democracy in foreign policy, and he made this a key component of his administration's foreign policy approach.
Explanation:
In what ways does the United States Constitution manifest the principles of both republican and democratic forms of government? In what ways does it deviate from these principles
The United States Constitution is a unique document that reflects both republican and democratic principles, while also deviating from them in certain ways.
Republican principles emphasize the idea of representative government, where elected officials are chosen to act on behalf of the people. The Constitution embodies these principles in several ways. For instance, the House of Representatives and the Senate, the two chambers of the U.S. Congress, are both representative bodies whose members are elected by the people. The Constitution also establishes a system of checks and balances, with the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government having separate powers that serve as a safeguard against any one branch becoming too powerful.
Democratic principles, on the other hand, emphasize the idea of direct popular participation in government. The Constitution embodies these principles through various provisions that allow for direct participation in the democratic process, such as the right to vote in elections and the right to petition the government.
However, the Constitution also deviates from these principles in certain ways. For example, the Constitution originally did not provide for the direct election of senators, but rather had them appointed by state legislatures. This was changed with the ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913. Additionally, the Electoral College, which is used to elect the President, is not a direct election by the people, but rather an indirect election where electors are chosen by the people to cast their vote for President.
In summary, the United States Constitution reflects both republican and democratic principles in various ways, but also deviates from them in certain areas.
how did african american athletes dispel the theory of social darwinism
In conclusion, African American athletes played a significant role in dispelling the theory of Social Darwinism by demonstrating that success was not solely determined by biological factors, but also by access to opportunity and resources.
What is Social Darwinism theory?
The theory of Social Darwinism, which emerged in the late 19th century, posited that the social, economic, and political success of certain groups was due to their inherent superiority over others. This theory was often used to justify racial discrimination and segregation, particularly in the United States.
African American athletes faced significant obstacles and discrimination throughout much of the 20th century, particularly in the realm of sports. Despite these challenges, however, they achieved remarkable success, both individually and as a group.
By achieving success in sports, African American athletes challenged the idea that success was solely determined by genetics or inherent superiority.
Moreover, African American athletes also served as role models for young people, particularly African Americans, and helped to inspire generations of individuals to pursue their dreams and overcome obstacles. In doing so, they helped to dispel the myth that certain groups were inherently inferior and incapable of success.
To know more about Darwin theory related question visit:
https://brainly.com/question/25718754
#SPJ1
Recap Quiz
Question
The Second Great Awakening influenced many converts to
O
move to New England
O
argue against women's suffrage
O participate in social reform movements
O teach slaves to read and write
The Second Great Awakening influenced many converts to participate in social reform movements.
What are reform movements?Reform movements are organized efforts to bring about social, political, or cultural change. They are typically motivated by a desire to correct perceived injustices or to improve the well-being of a particular group or society as a whole. Examples of reform movements include the abolitionist movement, which sought to end slavery, the suffrage movement, which fought for women's right to vote, and the civil rights movement, which aimed to end racial discrimination. Reform movements can take many forms, including protests, demonstrations, lobbying efforts, and legal challenges. They often involve grassroots activism and can be driven by individuals or organizations with a particular agenda or set of beliefs.
To learn more about reform movements, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14603250
#SPJ1
What was one of the accomplishments of the mining days
Answer:
Better technology allowed the development of new mining techniques, and more uses for existing and discovered resources.
Explanation:
hope this helps!!!
What was the primary goal of Cesar Chavez's activism?
improving the lives of fellow farm workers
increasing representation for Mexican-Americans in Congress
ending racism toward Mexican-Americans
ending poverty in California
Iimproving the lives of fellow farm workers was the primary goal of Cesar Chavez's activism
What was the primary goal of Cesar Chavez's activism?The primary goal of Cesar Chavez's activism was improving the lives of fellow farm workers.
He was a labor leader and civil rights activist who co-founded the United Farm Workers (UFW) with Dolores Huerta in 1962. Chavez fought for better working conditions, fair wages, and labor rights for farm workers, many of whom were Mexican-American or other minority groups.
Read more on Cesar Chavez's here https://brainly.com/question/1225845
#SPJ1
In anticipation of their victory over all of Europe, how many Jews did the perpetrators of the Final Solution plan to exterminate?
A.
1 million
B.
5 million
C.
10 million
D.
11 million
B. 5 million, was the number of Jews the perpetrators of the Final Solution plan to exterminate in anticipation of their conquest of all of Europe.
In its entirety, the "Final Solution" called for the murder of all European Jews by gassing, shooting, and other means. Six million Jewish men, women, and children were killed during the Holocaust—two-thirds of the Jews living in Europe before World War II.
Hence, option b. is the right choice.
Was There a "Final Solution"?As part of the Nazi "Final Solution to the Jewish Question" , European Jews were purposefully and systematically executed. It occurred between 1941 and 1945 and was the last phase of the Holocaust.
When Nazi Germany's top officials made the "Final Solution" their preferred course of action remains unknown. But it is certain that the "Final Solution" was the result of ten years of the Nazis' increasingly draconian anti-Jewish discrimination.
To know more about Final Solution visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1371514.
#SPJ1
This state provides 49,000 young men for the war, and almost 1,300 of them died.
Make sure you answer this correctly.
Answer:
Arizona.................
PLEASE HELP DUE TODAY
Explain what spurred the creation of the Voting Rights Act of 1968. What events took place leading up to it, and what was the goal of the act as it was written? Give an example of at least one specific section of the act.
The Voting Rights Act of 1968 was created in response to the ongoing struggle for civil rights and voting rights for African Americans in the United States. The act was designed to address some of the issues that had arisen since the passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which had banned discriminatory voting practices such as literacy tests and poll taxes.
One of the key events leading up to the creation of the Voting Rights Act of 1968 was the assassination of civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. in April 1968. This event sparked riots and protests across the country, and many people felt that more needed to be done to address issues of racial inequality and discrimination.
The goal of the Voting Rights Act of 1968 was to further strengthen voting rights protections for African Americans and other minority groups. The act specifically prohibited discrimination in voting based on race, color, or membership in a language minority group. It also provided for federal examiners who could register voters in areas where local officials were known to discriminate against minority voters.
One specific section of the act is Section 203, which requires certain jurisdictions with a significant number of non-English speaking citizens to provide bilingual election materials and assistance.
I hope that helps!
SPJ1#
what specfic similarities does miller indentify between the prosecutions and the confessions of the accused in both the witch hunts and the communist hearings
The Crucible by Arthur Miller's significant depiction is about the oppression & confession by the accused in relation to witch trials. However, in order to spare their lives, the people were tasked to confess to the witch trials.
What is meant by representation?a portrayal of an individual or thing through words or visuals. The book's account of the early history of the nation is intriguing.
What distinguishes a description from a portrayal?Three crucial distinctions enable us to deduce the difference between depictions and descriptions: Descriptions differ from representations (1) in the symbol system they employ (using finite symbols vs. gradient marks), (2) in the form-meaning mappings they use (essentially arbitrary vs.
To know more about depiction visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30781042
#SPJ1
While a national health care program was a popular idea with Democrats, Republican critics pointed out that:
• A. it wouldn't be popular with citizens.
• B. it wouldn't cover long-term illnesses.
• C. it would be too expensive to fund.
• D. it wouldn't provide enough coverage.
Republicans are in favor of a health insurance structure that lowers costs, provides openness and choice, and safeguards those with pre-existing diseases. Democrats contend that every American has a right to access to inexpensive, high-quality healthcare, not a privilege. The correct option to this question is C.
What is used to argue against universal healthcare?One of the arguments made against a universal healthcare system is that it would unfairly penalize the nation's wealthiest citizens and companies. Why should these people foot the bill for the nation's most vulnerable and sickest citizens? Additionally, a national healthcare system could expose the nation to expensive malpractice claims.According to the liberal health care stance, everyone has an equal right to health care, which should be implemented through a social insurance system that offers universal coverage.For more information on national healthcare program kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/30752971
#SPJ1
4. How did the "Black Land" impact ancient Egyptian civilization?
Answer:
Explanation:
The "Black Land," or Kemet, was the fertile strip of land along the Nile River that allowed ancient Egypt to thrive and develop into a powerful civilization. The annual flooding of the Nile deposited rich silt onto the land, making it incredibly fertile and perfect for agriculture. This allowed the Egyptians to grow abundant crops, including wheat, barley, flax, and vegetables, which in turn supported a large and growing population.
The abundance of food and resources provided by the Black Land allowed the Egyptians to develop a complex and sophisticated civilization. They built large cities, constructed monumental architecture, and developed a system of writing and mathematics. The Nile also provided transportation and communication networks, enabling trade and commerce to flourish.
Additionally, the Nile played a central role in the religious beliefs of the Egyptians, who saw it as a source of life and renewal. The annual flooding was viewed as a gift from the gods, and the waters of the Nile were used in religious ceremonies and rituals.
Overall, the Black Land was essential to the development of ancient Egyptian civilization, and its impact can still be seen in the country today.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
What characteristic gives the Red River its name? A. The water Collects minerals from reddish-orange soils. B.The river's Source is in Mexico's Rojo Mountains; "rojo" is Spanish for "red." C. High acidity in the river turns the water reddish-orange. D. Plants growing on the banks drop leaves that stain the water reddish-orange.
Answer: A
PLEASE GIVE ME BRAINLIEST
Explanation:
The Red River (also called the Southern Red River) is located in the southern United States and flows southeast through Texas and Oklahoma.
Its name is due to the fact that the river transports large amounts of red soil, coming from the bed of its basin, during flood periods. Another important feature of this river is that it has a high salt content.
PLS HELP FAST
Explain what spurred the creation of the Voting Rights Act of 1968. What events took place leading up to it, and what was the goal of the act as it was written? Give an example of at least one specific section of the act.
Answer:
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on August 6, 1965, in response to the events in Selma and other civil rights protests across the country. The goal of the act was to eliminate discriminatory voting practices and ensure that all citizens, regardless of race, had equal access to the ballot box. The act included several key provisions, including:
The requirement for certain states and jurisdictions with a history of discriminatory voting practices to obtain federal approval (known as "preclearance") before making any changes to their voting laws or procedures.
The prohibition of literacy tests and other discriminatory practices that had been used to prevent African Americans from voting.
The authorization of federal examiners to oversee voter registration and ensure that all citizens had equal access to the ballot box.
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was a landmark piece of legislation that helped to enshrine voting rights as a fundamental right for all Americans. It played a critical role in increasing African American voter registration and turnout, and helped to pave the way for future civil rights legislation.
Explanation:
TIME REMAIN
55:27
Read the passage.
(1) I think that schools should switch from using paper
textbooks to using computer tablets. (2) Textbooks
were effective in the pre-digital age, but now we live in
a technology-based society, so schools need to get
with the program and adopt a modern approach to
learning. (3) In fact, the chair of the Federal
Communications Commission said that "it's time for the
next stage" of learning with tablets and pointed out how
textbooks are often out of date. (4) Opponents arque
that tablets aren't a good choice because initially
they're very expensive. (5) The secretary of education
pointed out that tablets can be updated regularly, which
saves money in the long run. (6) Not to mention the
pluses of having the latest and greatest info! (7) Many
experts agree that switching to tablets is important for
the future of education.
Which phrase in sentence 2 should be revised to
maintain a formal style?
O pre-digital age"
O technology-based society
O "get with the program"
O "modern approach"
Mark this and return
Save and Exit
The phrase that should be revised to maintain a formal style is "get with the program."
How to get the phrase that would maintain a formal styleAlthough it is a common statement in informal settings, the phrase "get with the program" might not be appropriate for a formal piece of writing.
Avoiding slang or colloquialisms, using more exact language, and adopting a more formal tone are all standard requirements of a formal style.
Thus, it would be preferable to use a more formal phrase in place of "get with the program" to retain a formal language, such as "adopt a contemporary approach" or "embrace a modern paradigm."
Read more on phrases here:https://brainly.com/question/139793
#SPJ1
