Which of the following were among the policies advocated by New Democrats, including presidential candidate Bill Clinton?

- streamlining government bureaucracy

- expanding policies earlier advocated by FDR and LBJ

- abolishing the death penalty

- supporting women's rights and gay rights

These are tge answers to the problem

13 The main purpose of having two consuls who only served one year in ancient Rome was to prevent one consul from becoming too powerful. By having two consuls who had to agree on major decisions, it helped to ensure that the power was shared and no one individual held too much control over the government.

14 The correct answer to the analogy is A. Senators and Consuls were part of the patrician class and represented the aristocracy, while Tribunes were elected by the Plebeian Council to represent the common people and to protect their interests.

15 The main reason governors were appointed in the Roman Empire was to run the local army and collect taxes. Governors were appointed by the Emperor to oversee and administer the various provinces of the Empire, and their primary responsibility was to maintain law and order and ensure that the province was contributing to the overall strength and stability of the Empire.

16 The Roman Constitution was not a written down document, but rather a set of guidelines and unwritten rules that were passed down from generation to generation. The principles of the Roman Constitution did inspire democracies, but it was not a formal, written document like many modern constitutions.

17 In ancient Rome, all Roman citizens had equal voting rights. However, it's important to note that not everyone living in Rome was a Roman citizen. Women did not have equal rights as men, and regular people (plebeians) did not have the same level of power and influence as the aristocracy.

Read more on ancient Rome here:https://brainly.com/question/29427174

#SPJ1

Answer: greatly pressured the President into declaring war on Spain.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

In the United States, the term "government" can refer to the entire system of elected officials, bureaucrats, and institutions that make and enforce laws at the federal, state, and local levels. This includes the President of the United States, as well as Congress, the Supreme Court, and various executive agencies and departments.

However, depending on the context, the term "government" may also be used more narrowly to refer specifically to the executive branch of the federal government, which includes the President, Vice President, and Cabinet-level officials. In this sense, the government would refer to the individuals and institutions responsible for implementing and enforcing federal policies and programs.

So, whether or not the term "government" refers to the President would depend on the specific context in which it is used.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Answer:

Explanation:

During the 18th century, several European nations were involved in the transatlantic slave trade, but the two most heavily involved were Portugal and England.

Portugal was one of the earliest European nations to engage in the slave trade, beginning in the 15th century with the colonization of Africa and the establishment of sugar plantations on Atlantic islands such as Madeira and São Tomé. During the 18th century, Portugal was one of the leading slave-trading nations, shipping millions of Africans across the Atlantic to work on plantations in Brazil and other colonies.

England also played a significant role in the slave trade during the 18th century, especially after the Royal African Company lost its monopoly on the trade in 1698. English slave traders were heavily involved in the transportation of enslaved Africans to British colonies in the Caribbean and North America, and many English merchants and shipowners profited greatly from the trade. The British slave trade continued until it was officially abolished in 1807.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

There are few monopolies in the United States as a result of the antitrust laws there. The majority of well-known companies in the United States do not meet the criteria for a monopolies, despite the perception of this by many.

A  monopoly is a business that sells its product exclusively and does not have any close competitors. A monopoly that is not regulated has market power and can affect prices. Examples: Microsoft and Windows, DeBeers and jewels, your neighborhood petroleum gas organization.

There are numerous strategies for establishing a monopoly, the majority of which necessitate government assistance. By granting a company exclusive rights to provide goods or services, the government may grant a monopoly the easiest way to become one. A genuine illustration of this comes from the universe of innovation, where Microsoft Corp's (MSFT) copyright of its Windows programming successfully gave the firm a syndication on what added up to a progressive new way for PC clients to explore and deal with their on-screen exercises.

To learn more about monopolies visit :

https://brainly.com/question/10441375

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Washington-backed governments of South Vietnam and Afghanistan were both heavily reliant on U.S. military and financial support to fight against communist insurgencies. Despite this support, both governments eventually collapsed. This was due in part to corruption within the governments, a lack of popular support, and the strength of the insurgencies they were fighting. These experiences suggest that military force alone may not be enough to create a stable government, and that efforts to promote good governance are essential to long-term success.

Explanation:

I hope the answer I provided helps.

The inference that can be made is that they were inspired by Paul Revere's warning and prepared to act against the British, which made an impact on winning the war. The Option D.

His poem tells about bravery and determination of the colonists who were all willing to take up fighting arms and fight for their freedom against the British.

While he played a crucial role in preparing the colonists for the British attack, the poem prove that it was the colonists themselves who ultimately made a significant impact on the outcome of the war.

Through their willingness to fight and their determination to achieve independence, the colonists demonstrated their strength and resilience in the face of adversity.

Read more about Midnight Ride

brainly.com/question/28274344

#SPJ1

D A family must move when the government buys their house to build a highway route.

Why is it?

The example that illustrates the aspect of civic responsibility where the common good of the community takes priority over individual rights is option D, where a family must move when the government buys their house to build a highway route.

In this case, the government is prioritizing the construction of a highway, which is considered to be in the best interest of the community and will benefit many people by providing a faster and more efficient transportation route.

While it may negatively impact the family by requiring them to move, it is deemed necessary for the greater good of the community. This exemplifies how sometimes individual rights must be sacrificed for the greater good of society.

To know more about Government related question visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16940043

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation:

The early Middle Ages, also known as the Dark Ages, spanned from the 5th to the 10th century AD in Europe. During this period, the social and economic systems were characterized by the Tripartite System and Manorialism.

The Tripartite System was a social structure that divided society into three classes or estates. The first estate was the clergy, the second estate was the nobility, and the third estate was the commoners or peasants. Each estate had a specific role and responsibilities within society.

The clergy was responsible for providing spiritual guidance to the people and overseeing religious affairs. They were exempt from taxes and had significant wealth and power.

The nobility were the landowners and rulers of the land. They had military and administrative responsibilities and were responsible for protecting their land and people. They were granted land by the king in exchange for military service and loyalty.

The commoners, also known as the peasants or serfs, were the majority of the population. They were tied to the land they worked on and were required to provide labor and goods to the lord of the manor in exchange for protection and the use of the land.

Manorialism was an economic system that was closely linked to the Tripartite System. It was a system of land ownership and management that was based on the manor, which was a self-sufficient estate that included a village, a church, and agricultural land. The lord of the manor owned the land and controlled the resources and production.

The peasants, who worked the land, were required to give a portion of their crops and produce to the lord of the manor as rent or taxes. They also had to provide labor on the lord's land and were subject to the lord's jurisdiction.

The lord of the manor, in turn, was responsible for protecting the peasants from outside threats, maintaining law and order, and providing for the needs of the village. He also had the power to make laws and enforce them on his land.

Overall, the Tripartite System and Manorialism were interconnected social and economic systems that dominated the early Middle Ages in Europe. These systems shaped the lives and roles of different classes of people and influenced the development of medieval society and culture.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Two of the immediate consequences of the September 11th attacks were the implementation of enhanced security measures and the initiation of the US-led War on Terror. In the wake of the attacks, airports, government buildings, and public spaces all over the world immediately tightened security measures, leading to increased screenings, checks, and restrictions. Meanwhile, the US government declared a global War on Terror and launched military operations in Afghanistan, targeting the Taliban regime, which had been harboring the al-Qaeda terrorist group responsible for the attacks. These immediate consequences had far-reaching effects on global politics, international relations, and the lives of millions of people around the world.

~~~Harsha~~~

Answer:

C and E

Explanation:

The two immediate consequences of the September 11th attacks were:

The United States attacked Afghanistan: Following the attacks, the U.S. government launched a military campaign against the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, which was harboring Osama bin Laden and the al-Qaeda organization responsible for the attacks. The U.S. and its allies ousted the Taliban from power and engaged in a prolonged war in Afghanistan, which lasted for more than a decade.

Muslims were victimized and subject to violence: The attacks were carried out by a group of Islamist extremists, which led to a backlash against Muslims and individuals perceived to be Muslim. Hate crimes against Muslims increased, and they were subject to discrimination, harassment, and violence. This created a significant societal divide and led to a rise in Islamophobia.

Answer:

Explanation:

The terms "Old World" and "New World" are used to distinguish between Europe, Asia, and Africa (the Old World) and the Americas (the New World) following Christopher Columbus's voyages in the late 15th and early 16th centuries.

Short-term effects of the discovery of the New World by Europeans included the transfer of crops, animals, and diseases between the two worlds. For example, Europeans brought crops such as wheat, barley, and grapes to the Americas, while the Americas introduced maize, potatoes, and tomatoes to Europe. European diseases like smallpox and measles, however, had a devastating impact on Native American populations, who had no immunity to them.

In the long term, the discovery of the New World had a significant impact on the world's economy, politics, and culture. European colonization of the Americas led to the exploitation of indigenous populations and the establishment of slave labor systems that enriched European countries. The New World's abundance of resources, including gold and silver, also fueled the growth of capitalist economies in Europe.

The discovery of the New World also had cultural and political effects. The exchange of ideas, beliefs, and cultures between the Old World and the New World led to the creation of new religions and the blending of European, African, and Native American cultures. The discovery of the Americas also challenged the long-held belief that the Earth was flat and had a profound impact on European religious, scientific, and philosophical thought. The creation of new political systems, such as the United States, also resulted from the discovery of the New World.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Answer:

Explanation:

Yes, an accomplice is someone who aids another in a crime

The Civil Rights Movement in the United States connected to the Cold War because the U.S. government, in its efforts to promote democracy and freedom abroad, faced criticism from other nations for its treatment of African Americans at home.This criticism weakened the U.S.'s moral authority and made it difficult to promote democracy and human rights abroad.

Additionally, the Soviet Union used America's racial discrimination to denounce U.S. claims of moral superiority and gain support for its own ideology. As a result, the Civil Rights Movement became intertwined with the larger global struggle between democracy and communism, and the U.S. government became more willing to support civil rights reforms in order to maintain its international credibility.

To learn more about Cold War,

https://brainly.com/question/26831734

Answer:

false i think

Explanation:

False

Victory gardens, also called war gardens or food gardens for defence, were planted in vegetable, fruit, and herb gardens at private residences and public parks in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and Germany during World War I and World War II not to support Japanese.

To explore more about victory gardens:

https://brainly.com/question/30131426

Answer:In March 2021, the House passed the "Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021", which requires background checks on all gun sales. In May 2022, two mass shootings in Buffalo, New York and Uvalde, Texas sparked hundreds of anti-gun violence demonstrations, and calls for gun control re-surged. The Senate and the House adopted new gun control legislation, only after Democrats significantly weakened the control measures. At the same time, however, the Supreme Court issued a ruling striking down New York State's 1911 law which restricts carrying a concealed firearm in public. This directly undermined the ability of state and local governments to monitor firearms in New York, California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts and New Jersey American public is deeply divided on gun control. Public opinion polls in recent years have shown that women, urban residents, non-native born, liberal-leaning people and non-gun owners are more likely to support gun control, while men, rural residents, native-born Americans, political conservatives, hunters and gun owners oppose it. The gap between Americans' stance on gun control is still widening., among others. I hope this helps FAST good luck!!!!! :)

Explanation:

Answer:

The model minority stereotype is a generalization that portrays Asian Americans as a high achieving, hardworking, and successful group compared to other minority groups in the United States, particularly African Americans. This stereotype suggests that Asian Americans are a "model" for other minority groups to follow and that they have overcome any barriers to success through their own efforts.

While this stereotype may seem positive on the surface, it can have negative impacts on both Asian Americans and African Americans. For Asian Americans, the model minority stereotype can create pressure to conform to the stereotype and maintain high levels of achievement, which can lead to stress, anxiety, and mental health issues. Additionally, it can lead to erasure of the diversity within the Asian American community and perpetuate the idea that all Asian Americans are successful and do not face any struggles or discrimination.

On the other hand, the model minority stereotype can also harm African Americans by perpetuating the idea that their struggles and challenges are due to personal failings rather than systemic racism and discrimination. This stereotype can be used to justify the marginalization and oppression of African Americans by suggesting that they could achieve success if only they worked as hard as Asian Americans.

Moreover, the model minority stereotype can create tension between Asian Americans and African Americans, as Asian Americans may be seen as "privileged" and "honorary whites" due to their perceived success. This can lead to inter-minority conflict and division.

In conclusion, the model minority stereotype has complex and far-reaching effects on both Asian Americans and African Americans. While it may seem positive on the surface, it can perpetuate harmful stereotypes, create pressure to conform to unrealistic expectations, and cause inter-minority tensions. It is important to recognize the diversity within both communities and to work towards dismantling systemic racism and discrimination that affect all minority groups in the United States.

Explanation:

Answer:

The South fell behind the North in terms of progress for a variety of reasons, including economic, political, and social factors.

Economically, the South relied heavily on agriculture, particularly the production of cotton, tobacco, and rice, which were labor-intensive crops. The reliance on agriculture meant that the South did not develop the same level of industrialization as the North, which had a more diverse economy that included manufacturing and trade.

Politically, the South's focus on states' rights and its defense of slavery also hindered its progress. The South's political leaders resisted federal investment in infrastructure and education, which were crucial to the development of modern economies.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

This is a complex and debatable question that historians have different opinions on. However, based on the information I found, I can try to give you a general overview of some possible answers.

The British Industrial Revolution was a period of scientific and technological development in the 18th and 19th centuries that transformed rural, agrarian societies into urban, industrial ones12. It started in Britain in the late 1700s and spread to other parts of the world, especially North America2. It introduced new machines and techniques in textiles, iron making and other industries that increased the production of goods in mass quantities by factories12. It also changed the types of employment and the living conditions of people, who migrated from the countryside to the cities in search of work13. It had positive benefits such as longer life expectancy and ease of work, but also negative consequences such as deplorable working conditions and unsanitary environments3.

The European Industrial Revolution was a similar process that occurred in other parts of Europe, such as France, Germany and Belgium, in the late 18th and early 19th centuries45. It was influenced by the British Industrial Revolution, but also had its own distinctive features and challenges. For example, France had to deal with political turmoil and social unrest during the French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars, which hindered its industrial development4. Germany was divided into many small states that lacked political unity and economic integration until the late 19th century4. Belgium was one of the first countries to follow Britain’s example and became a leader in coal mining and iron production4.

Some historians argue that the Industrial Revolutions were inevitable because they were driven by natural forces such as population growth, resource availability, market expansion and scientific discovery124. They claim that these factors created a demand for more efficient production and transportation methods that could only be met by industrialization. They also point out that industrialization occurred independently in different regions of the world at different times, suggesting that it was a universal phenomenon that could not be prevented or delayed2.

Other historians argue that the Industrial Revolutions were not inevitable but contingent on specific historical circumstances and human choices36. They claim that industrialization was not a natural or necessary outcome of economic development, but rather a result of social, political and cultural factors that varied across time and space. They also point out that industrialization had negative impacts on the environment, human health, social justice and cultural diversity that could have been avoided or mitigated by alternative modes of production and consumption36.

As for whether they could have happened sooner than they did, this is also a matter of speculation and debate. Some historians suggest that there were preconditions for industrialization that existed long before the 18th century, such as technological innovations, commercial networks, urbanization and scientific knowledge124. They argue that if these preconditions had been combined or exploited earlier, industrialization could have started sooner. For example, some scholars have proposed that China or India had the potential to industrialize before Europe because they had advanced civilizations with large populations, rich resources and sophisticated technologies2.

Other historians suggest that there were obstacles or barriers to industrialization that prevented it from happening earlier or faster than it did, such as political instability, cultural resistance, religious beliefs or environmental constraints36. They argue that if these obstacles had been removed or overcome earlier, industrialization could have progressed faster. For example, some scholars have proposed that Europe’s feudal system, Catholic Church or Little Ice Age delayed its industrial development until the 18th century36.

In conclusion, there is no definitive answer to your question, but rather different perspectives and arguments based on different sources and interpretations of evidence. I hope this helps you understand some of the main issues and debates surrounding the Industrial Revolutions.

Based on the Nuremberg Laws implemented by Nazi regime, option C) Vlad would be forced to divorce Irena to stay alive is most likely scenario.

The Nazi regime, led by Adolf Hitler, was a fascist government that ruled Germany from 1933 to 1945. The regime was characterized by extreme nationalism, totalitarianism, and a belief in the superiority of the Aryan race. The Nazis implemented policies that were responsible for the genocide of six million Jews and millions of other "undesirables" such as homosexuals, disabled individuals, Romani people, and political dissidents. The regime also pursued aggressive foreign policies, leading to the outbreak of World War II. The Nazi regime was ultimately defeated in 1945 by the Allied Powers, resulting in the end of the Holocaust and the liberation of concentration camps. The legacy of the Nazi regime continues to have a profound impact on the world today.

To learn more about Nazi regime, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29811895

#SPJ1

Answer: D.  increased border security.

Explanation: During George W. Bush's presidency, border security was a significant area of focus in his domestic policy.  This emphasis was driven by concerns over illegal immigration and national security.

In response to these concerns, Bush implemented several initiatives to enhance border security.  One of the most notable actions was the passage of the Secure Fence Act of 2006, which authorized the construction of physical barriers along the U.S.-Mexico border. This legislation aimed to deter unauthorized crossings and improve control over the border.

Furthermore, the Bush administration increased funding and resources for border enforcement agencies such as the U.S. Border Patrol.  This included expanding the number of Border Patrol agents and investing in technology and infrastructure to enhance surveillance and detection capabilities.

Learn more about George W. Bush here: https://brainly.com/question/8019226.

C. As head of the German euthanasia program, he had firsthand knowledge of methods to kill people.

Globocnik appointed  Christian Wirth as the commandant of Betzec in December 1941 despite the fact that he had prior experience killing people with gas under the "involuntary euthanasia" program.

This was the previous experience that most likely prepared him for this job.

Hence, option C. is correct.

In Germany, institutionalised persons with impairments were routinely murdered as part of the Euthanasia Programme. It was around two years before the Holocaust, which was the systematic extermination of European Jews.

The programme was one of several extreme eugenic policies designed to restore the racial "integrity" of the German people.

To know more on Euthanasia program visit:

https://brainly.com/question/27244953

#SPJ1

Based on the given information, it is likely that Hazel was selected for forced labor at another location. The fact that she and the other women from her previous barracks were called to roll call and told they would be leaving the camp suggests that they were not immediately killed or sent to the gas chambers, but rather selected for some form of work. However, without further information it is impossible to say for certain what happened to Hazel after she left Auschwitz.

Answer:

The statement that best explains why Hitler led Germany to commit the atrocities of the Holocaust is A. He believed that Germany should be a racially pure empire. Hitler and the Nazi party believed in the concept of racial purity, which they called "Aryanism." They believed that the Germanic people were a superior race, and that other races, particularly Jews, were inferior and posed a threat to the purity of the German race. Hitler saw the Holocaust as a means of eliminating what he viewed as a threat to the Aryan race and purifying Germany.

Explanation:

Over the subsequent 50 years, the Plessy v. Ferguson ruling upheld the fundamental idea of racial segregation. The decision gave segregation on trains and buses, as well as in public places like hotels, theatres, and schools, legal legitimacy.

On May 18, 1896, the US Supreme Court alters the course of history! On that date, the Court affirmed state-imposed Jim Crow laws in its Plessy v. Ferguson "separate but equal" judgement. For the following fifty years, it served as the official justification for racial segregation in the United States.

Has Plessy v. Ferguson been ruled invalid?

The Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka on May 17, 1954, is arguably the most well-known of all cases since it marked the beginning of the end to segregation. It overturned the 1896 judgement in Plessy v. Ferguson, which had been as comprehensive.

To learn more about Plessy v. Ferguson, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12846797

#SPJ1

decreased tension with the United States and Western Europe.

Answer:

Option A) his successful orchestration of the Montgomery Bus Boycott is cited as the reason behind Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. being elected the youngest president of the Montgomery Improvement Association.

Explanation:

Answer:

A time of peace between 2 parties.

Explanation:

I assume your meant a truce. A truce is when a group of people or 2 people are fighting and they decide to make a truce for a time of peace until the truce is broken.

Answer:

So, I have the answer for the question. Just click the link attach to this, and you'll have the answer!

Hope it helps!